Chailleux, C. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2019

JMJD6 participates in the maintenance of ribosomal DNA integrity in response to DNA damage

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is the most transcribed genomic region and contains hundreds of tandem repeats. Maintaining these rDNA repeats as well as the level of rDNA transcription is essential for cellular homeostasis. DNA damages generated in rDNA need to be efficiently and accurately repaired as rDNA repeats instability has been reported in cancer, aging and neurological diseases. Here, we describe that the histone demethylase JMJD6 is rapidly recruited at nucleolar DNA damage and is crucial for the relocalisation of rDNA in nucleolar caps. Yet, JMJD6 is dispensable for rDNA transcription inhibition. Mass spectrometry study revealed that JMJD6 interacts with the nucleolar protein Treacle and modulates its interaction with NBS1. Moreover, cells deficient for JMJD6 show increased sensitivity to nucleolar DNA damage as well as loss and rearrangements of rDNA repeats upon irradiation. Altogether our data reveals that rDNA transcription inhibition is uncoupled from rDNA relocalisation into nucleolar caps and that JMJD6 is required for rDNA stability upon the rDNA damage response through its role in nucleolar caps formation.\n\nAuthor summaryRibosomal DNA is the most transcribed genomic region composed of repeated sequences. Transcribed rDNA is essential for cellular homeostasis and cell proliferation. Numerous pathologies such as cancer and neurological disorders are described to present defective rDNA repeats maintenance. The mechanisms involved in the control of rDNA integrity involve major DNA repair pathways such as NonHomologous End-Joining and Homologous Recombination. However, how they are controlled and orchestrated is poorly understood. Here, we identified JMJD6 as a new member of the maintenance of rDNA integrity. We observed that JMJD6 controls the recruitment of NBS1 in the nucleolus in order to lead to the proper response to DNA damage at rDNA repeats.\n\nAuthor contributionsYC and DT wrote the manuscript with input from their coauthors. JF, CC, JH, S-KM, JL, J-PL and YC performed the experiments. JC supervised JF and JH during purification and mass spectrometry analysis. YC and DT conceived the project, designed research and coordinated the studies.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Mammalian RAD51 prevents non-conservative alternative end-joining and single strand annealing through non-catalytic mechanismssms

The selection of the DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair pathway is decisive for genetic stability/instability. We proposed that it acts according to two successive steps: 1-canonical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) versus single-strand DNA (ssDNA) resection; 2- on ssDNA, gene conversion (GC) versus non-conservative single-strand annealing (SSA) or alternative end-joining (A-EJ).\n\nUsing intramolecular substrates, we systematically analysed the equilibrium between the different DSB repair pathways. We show that ablation of RAD51 stimulated both SSA and A-EJ but did not stimulate C-NHEJ, validating the two-step model. Moreover, we found that two ATP-mutant dominant-negative forms of RAD51 that stimulated non-conservative repair, failed to load into damaged chromatin, clarifying the role of ATP in RAD51-mediated HR, also. In contrast, another dominant-negative form of RAD51, which retains its DNA binding capacities, repressed SSA and A-EJ, revealing two separable functions of RAD51 i.e. GC and non-conservative repair inhibition. In vitro assays show that the binding of RAD51 on both complementary ssDNA is required to block both spontaneous and RAD52-induced strand annealing. Therefore, RAD51 represses non-conservative repair (SSA and A-EJ), by inhibiting the annealing step through ssDNA occupancy, independently of the catalytic strand-exchange activity required for GC.

molecular biology↗