Biology subjects

Cesarini, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Cesarini, D..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Resource Profile and User Guide of the Polygenic Index Repository

Polygenic indexes (PGIs) are DNA-based predictors. Their value for research in many scientific disciplines is rapidly growing. As a resource for researchers, we used a consistent methodology to construct PGIs for 47 phenotypes in 11 datasets. To maximize the PGIs prediction accuracies, we constructed them using genome-wide association studies--some of which are novel--from multiple data sources, including 23andMe and UK Biobank. We present a theoretical framework to help interpret analyses involving PGIs. A key insight is that a PGI can be understood as an unbiased but noisy measure of a latent variable we call the "additive SNP factor." Regressions in which the true regressor is the additive SNP factor but the PGI is used as its proxy therefore suffer from errors-in-variables bias. We derive an estimator that corrects for the bias, illustrate the correction, and make a Python tool for implementing it publicly available.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2021

Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis yields novel genetic discoveries and ancestry-specific associations

We present a new method, Multi-Ancestry Meta-Analysis (MAMA), which combines genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from multiple populations to produce new summary statistics for each population, identifying novel loci that would not have been discovered in either set of GWAS summary statistics alone. In simulations, MAMA increases power with less bias and generally lower type-1 error rate than other multi-ancestry meta-analysis approaches. We apply MAMA to 23 phenotypes in East-Asian- and European-ancestry populations and find substantial gains in power. In an independent sample, novel genetic discoveries from MAMA replicate strongly.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Mendelian imputation of parental genotypes for genome-wide estimation of direct and indirect genetic effects

Associations between genotype and phenotype derive from four sources: direct genetic effects, indirect genetic effects from relatives, population stratification, and correlations with other variants affecting the phenotype through assortative mating. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals have limited ability to distinguish the different sources of genotype-phenotype association, confusing interpretation of results and potentially leading to bias when those results are applied – in genetic prediction of traits, for example. With genetic data on families, the randomisation of genetic material during meiosis can be used to distinguish direct genetic effects from other sources of genotype-phenotype association. Genetic data on siblings is the most common form of genetic data on close relatives. We develop a method that takes advantage of identity-by-descent sharing between siblings to impute missing parental genotypes. Compared to no imputation, this increases the effective sample size for estimation of direct genetic effects and indirect parental effects by up to one third and one half respectively. We develop a related method for imputing missing parental genotypes when a parent-offspring pair is observed. We provide the imputation methods in a software package, SNIPar (single nucleotide imputation of parents), that also estimates genome-wide direct and indirect effects of SNPs. We apply this to a sample of 45,826 White British individuals in the UK Biobank who have at least one genotyped first degree relative. We estimate direct and indirect genetic effects for ∼5 million genome-wide SNPs for five traits. We estimate the correlation between direct genetic effects and effects estimated by standard GWAS to be 0.61 (S.E. 0.09) for years of education, 0.68 (S.E. 0.10) for neuroticism, 0.72 (S.E. 0.09) for smoking initiation, 0.87 (S.E. 0.04) for BMI, and 0.96 (S.E. 0.01) for height. These results suggest that GWAS based on unrelated individuals provides an inaccurate picture of direct genetic effects for certain human traits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Imprint of Assortative Mating on the Human Genome

Non-random mate-choice with respect to complex traits is widely observed in humans, but whether this reflects true phenotypic assortment, environment (social homogamy) or convergence after choosing a partner is not known. Understanding the causes of mate choice is important, because assortative mating (AM) if based upon heritable traits, has genetic and evolutionary consequences. AM is predicted under Fishers classical theory1 to induce a signature in the genome at trait-associated loci that can be detected and quantified. Here, we develop and apply a method to quantify AM on a specific trait by estimating the correlation ({theta}) between genetic predictors of the trait from SNPs on odd versus even chromosomes. We show by theory and simulation that the effect of AM can be distinguished from population stratification. We applied this approach to 32 complex traits and diseases using SNP data from [~]400,000 unrelated individuals of European ancestry. We found significant evidence of AM for height ({theta}=3.2%) and educational attainment ({theta}=2.7%), both consistent with theoretical predictions. Overall, our results imply that AM involves multiple traits, affects the genomic architecture of loci that are associated with these traits and that the consequence of mate choice can be detected from a random sample of genomes.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

MTAG: Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS

We introduce Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS (MTAG), a method for joint analysis of summary statistics from GWASs of different traits, possibly from overlapping samples. We apply MTAG to summary statistics for depressive symptoms (Neff = 354,862), neuroticism (N = 168,105), and subjective well-being (N = 388,538). Compared to 32, 9, and 13 genome-wide significant loci in the single-trait GWASs (most of which are themselves novel), MTAG increases the number of loci to 64, 37, and 49, respectively. Moreover, association statistics from MTAG yield more informative bioinformatics analyses and increase variance explained by polygenic scores by approximately 25%, matching theoretical expectations.

genomics↗