bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cecala, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Cecala, J. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative nectar metabolomics reveals sucrose-nitrogen tradeoffs and chemical drivers of microbial growth in floral nectar

IntroductionMany plant species secrete nectar to attract beneficial animals. The chemical composition of floral nectar influences pollinator nutrition and behavior, as well as microbial growth in flowers. Yet factors that predict nectar composition across plant species, as well as chemical compounds determining microbial growth in nectar, remain poorly understood. MethodsWe used both targeted and untargeted metabolomics to compare the nectar chemical profiles across 31 phylogenetically diverse plant species that span a range of floral morphologies. We examined the common classes of compounds detected in nectar and patterns of co-occurrence among them. We combined newly collected chemical data with previously published data on microbial growth in nectar of the same plant species to examine how nectar chemistry is associated with microbial growth. ResultsPlant species and clades varied in amino acid, minor sugar, and secondary metabolite composition and concentration. Sampled rosids and lilioids generally contained higher amino acids while asterids contained greater concentrations of oligosaccharides and sugar alcohols. Across plant species, proteinogenic amino acids frequently co-occurred in nectar but many were negatively associated with sucrose concentration. Plant species with greater concentrations of amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds hosted greater microbial density in nectar, while some other compound groups were negatively associated with microbial diversity. ConclusionsNegative correlations between nectar amino acid and sucrose concentration across species suggest ecological tradeoffs or physiological constraints in nectar composition. Given that the growth of common nectar microbes is limited by amino acid concentration, these findings suggest an ecological cost to amino acid production in nectar. Finally, we document variation among species in nectar vitamins, non proteinogenic amino acids and secondary metabolites with hypothesized yet currently untested ecological roles.

plant biology↗

Nontarget impacts of neonicotinoids on nectar-inhabiting microbes

Plant-systemic neonicotinoid (NN) insecticides can exert non-target impacts on organisms like beneficial insects and soil microbes. NNs can affect plant microbiomes, but we know little about their effects on microbial communities that mediate plant-insect interactions, including nectar-inhabiting microbes (NIMs). Here we employed two approaches to assess impacts of NN exposure on several NIM taxa. First, we assayed in vitro effects of six NN compounds on NIM growth using plate assays. Second, we inoculated a standardized NIM community into nectar of NN-treated canola (Brassica napus) and assessed survival and growth after 24 hours. With few exceptions, in vitro NN exposure tended to decrease bacterial growth metrics. However, the magnitude of decrease and the NN concentrations at which effects were observed varied substantially across bacteria. Yeasts showed no consistent in vitro response to NNs. In nectar, we saw no effects of NN treatment on NIM community metrics. Rather, NIM abundance and diversity responded to inherent plant qualities like nectar volume. In conclusion, we found no evidence NIMs respond to field-relevant NN levels in nectar within 24 h, but our study suggests that context, specifically assay methods, time, and plant traits, is important in assaying effects of NN on microbial communities.

microbiology↗