bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Carson, R. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Carson, R. G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Very low amplitude muscle activity increases probability of motor evoked potentials in healthy individuals and in ALS

IntroductionIn many clinical and research settings, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) intensities are standardised based on resting motor threshold (RMT). It is well-established that contraction of the target muscle increases motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and correspondingly decreases RMT. As such, when estimating RMT it is crucial to ensure the target muscle is relaxed. Typically trials in which baseline electromyographic (EMG) amplitude exceeds a specified threshold are rejected. The influence of motor activity below typical rejection thresholds on MEP amplitudes has yet to be established. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed TMS-EMG data collected during RMT measurement in 45 healthy controls (1761 datapoints) and 35 people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, 1238 datapoints). Trials where root mean squared (RMS) baseline EMG amplitude exceeded 10{micro}V were rejected. Generalised linear mixed-effects models were used to assess effects of muscle activity below this rejection threshold on probability of evoking an MEP with peak-to-peak amplitude [&ge;]50{micro}V. ResultsGreater sub-rejection-threshold activity significantly increases MEP probability in controls (p<0.0004) and people with ALS (p=0.0010). Models predicted a 31-38% increase in MEP probability when baseline RMS-EMG amplitude increased from 1{micro}V to 9{micro}V. Sub-rejection- threshold baseline activity was significantly greater in ALS than controls (p=0.0055). DiscussionWe have shown for the first time that higher EMG amplitudes below a typical rejection threshold markedly increase probability of evoking an MEP with peak-to-peak amplitude [&ge;]50{micro}V. Researchers should take measures to account for effects of sub-rejection-threshold activity on RMT, particularly in populations where baseline activity may be elevated, such as in ALS.

neuroscience↗

Unilateral movement preparation causes task-specific modulation of TMS responses in the passive, opposite limb.

Corticospinal excitability is modulated for muscles on both sides of the body during unilateral movement preparation. For the effector, there is a progressive increase in excitability, and a shift in direction of muscle twitches evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) toward the impending movement. By contrast, the directional characteristics of excitability changes in the opposite (passive) limb have not been fully characterized. Here we assessed how preparation of voluntary forces towards four spatially distinct visual targets with the left wrist alters muscle twitches and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by TMS of left motor cortex. MEPs were facilitated significantly more in muscles homologous to agonist rather than antagonist muscles in the active limb, from 120 ms prior to voluntary EMG onset. Thus, unilateral motor preparation has a directionally-specific influence on pathways projecting to the opposite limb that corresponds to the active muscles rather than the direction of movement in space. The directions of TMS-evoked twitches also deviated toward the impending force direction of the active limb, according to muscle-based coordinates, following the onset of voluntary EMG. The data indicate that preparation of a unilateral movement increases task-dependent excitability in ipsilateral motor cortex, or its downstream projections, that reflect the forces applied by the active limb in an intrinsic (body-centered), rather than an extrinsic (world-centered), coordinate system. The results suggest that ipsilateral motor cortical activity prior to unilateral action reflects the state of the active limb, rather than subliminal motor planning for the passive limb.

neuroscience↗