Biology subjects

Carozza, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Carozza, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The adaptive stochasticity hypothesis: modelling equifinality, multifinality and adaptation to adversity

Neural phenotypes are the result of probabilistic developmental processes. This means that stochasticity is an intrinsic aspect of the brain as it self-organizes over a protracted period. In other words, while both genomic and environmental factors shape the developing nervous system, another significant--though often neglected--contributor is the randomness introduced by probability distributions. Using generative modelling of brain networks, we provide a framework for probing the contribution of stochasticity to neurodevelopmental diversity. To mimic the prenatal scaffold of brain structure set by activity-independent mechanisms, we start our simulations from the medio-posterior neonatal rich-club (Developing Human Connectome Project; dHCP, n = 630). From this initial starting point, models implementing Hebbian-like wiring processes generate variable yet consistently plausible brain network topologies. By analyzing repeated runs of the generative process (> 107 simulations), we identify critical determinants and effects of stochasticity. Namely, we find that stochastic variation has a greater impact on brain organization when networks develop under weaker constraints. This heightened stochasticity makes brain networks more robust to random and targeted attacks, but more often results in non-normative phenotypic outcomes. To test our framework empirically, we evaluated whether stochasticity varies according to the experience of early-life deprivation using a cohort of neurodiverse children (Centre for Attention, Learning and Memory; CALM n = 357). We show that low socioeconomic status predicts more stochastic brain wiring. We conclude that stochasticity may be an unappreciated contributor to relevant developmental outcomes, and make specific predictions for future research.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Socio-economic disadvantage is associated with alterations in brain wiring economy

The quality of a childs social and physical environment is a key influence on brain development, educational attainment and mental wellbeing. However, there still remains a mechanistic gap in our understanding of how environmental influences converge on changes in the brains developmental trajectory. In a sample of 145 children with structural diffusion tensor imaging data, we used generative network modelling to simulate the emergence of whole brain network organisation. We then applied data-driven clustering to stratify the sample according to socio-economic disadvantage, with one of the resulting clusters containing mostly children living below the poverty line. A formal comparison of the simulated networks from the generative model revealed that the computational principles governing network formation were subtly different for children experiencing socio-economic disadvantage, and that this resulted in significantly altered developmental timing of network modularity emergence. Children in the low socio-economic status (SES) group had a significantly slower time to peak modularity, relative to the higher SES group (t(69) = 3.02, P = 3.50 x 10-4, d = 0.491). In a subsequent simulation we showed that the alteration in generative properties increases the variability in wiring probabilities during network formation (KS test: D = 0.012, P < 0.001). One possibility is that multiple environmental influences such as stress, diet and environmental stimulation impact both the systematic coordination of neuronal activity and biological resource constraints, converging on a shift in the economic conditions under which networks form. Alternatively, it is possible that this stochasticity reflects an adaptive mechanism that creates "resilient" networks better suited to unpredictable environments. Author SummaryWe used generative network models to simulate macroscopic brain network development in a sample of 145 children. Within these models, network connections form probabilistically depending on the estimated "cost" of forming a connection, versus topological "value" that the connection would confer. Tracking the formation of the network across the simulation, we could establish the changes in global brain organisation measures such as integration and segregation. Simulations for children experiencing socio-economic disadvantage were associated with a shift in emergence of a topologically valuable network property, namely modularity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Early adversity changes the economic conditions of structural brain network organisation

Early adversity can change educational, cognitive, and mental health outcomes. However, the neural processes through which early adversity exerts these effects remain largely unknown. We used generative network modelling of the mouse connectome to test whether unpredictable postnatal stress shifts the constraints that govern the formation of the structural connectome. A model that trades off the wiring cost of long-distance connections with topological homophily (i.e. links between regions with shared neighbours) generated simulations that replicate the organisation of the rodent connectome. The imposition of early life adversity significantly shifted the best-performing parameter combinations toward zero, heightening the stochastic nature of the generative process. Put simply, unpredictable postnatal stress changes the economic constraints that shape network formation, introducing greater randomness into the structural development of the brain. While this change may constrain the development of cognitive abilities, it could also reflect an adaptive mechanism. In other words, neural development could harness heightened stochasticity to make networks more robust to perturbation, thereby facilitating effective responses to future threats and challenges. Significance statementChildren who experience adversity early in life - such as chronic poverty or abuse - show numerous neural differences that are linked to poorer cognition and mental health later in life. To effectively mitigate the burden of adversity, it is critical to identify how these differences arise. In this paper, we use computational modelling to test whether growing up in an impoverished and unpredictable environment changes the development of structural connections in the mouse brain. We found that early adversity appears to introduce more stochasticity in the formation of neural architecture. Our findings point to a potential mechanism for how early adversity could change the course of child development.

neuroscience↗