bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

CaraDonna, P. J.

Publications and source records attributed to CaraDonna, P. J..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Demographic trade-offs decouple pollination services from plant population growth

Most plants require animal pollination to reproduce, prompting concern that pollinator declines immediately threaten plant populations. This concern is warranted if pollinator-mediated seed losses cause declines in plant population growth rates ({lambda}). However, demographic trade-offs might reduce the risk of population decline if seed loss improves performance elsewhere in the life cycle. We conducted a multi-year pollination manipulation on four species and measured how demographic vital rates and {lambda} responded. Seed responses did not predict net changes in {lambda}. Reduced pollination decreased seed production, but only caused a net decrease in {lambda} in one species; in the others, improved survival buffered {lambda}. Increased pollination boosted seed production, but at a cost to survival that caused a net reduction in {lambda} in three species. Our results highlight the importance of demographic trade-offs for understanding the impacts of pollinator declines on plant biodiversity and, more broadly, the population-level impacts of changing mutualisms.

ecology↗

Changing pollination rates affect plant life history strategies

An organisms life history strategy is an attempt to optimize fitness, given environmental constraints and inherent demographic tradeoffs. As such, life history helps to shape an organisms ecological and evolutionary responses to environmental change. However, life history can also be shaped by the environment, as the organisms demographic rates respond--directly or through tradeoffs--to the new conditions. This feedback between life history and environment remains poorly understood, limiting our ability to predict the outcomes of environmental change. Here, we studied the effects of environmental change - specifically altered pollination services - on four perennial plant species. We conducted a field-based demography experiment that subjected naturally occurring populations of Delphinium nuttallianum, Hydrophyllum fendleri, Potentilla pulcherrima and Erigeron speciosus to three pollination treatments: ambient (control), reduced, or increased pollination. We estimated population growth rate ({lambda}) and 11 metrics describing life history strategy and demographic resilience from an Integral Projection Model we constructed for each species and parameterized with 4-5 years of census data. Although most life history metrics responded idiosyncratically to pollination treatment, we found consistent effects of pollination on generation time, longevity and, in three of four species, recovery time. Specifically, reduced pollination led to increased longevity, generation time, and recovery time, and increased pollination led to the opposite. These changes in life history resemble shifts along the slow-fast continuum; reduced pollination led to slower lives and increased pollination led to faster lives. This is consequential because generation time and longevity influence short- and long-term population dynamics - for example, by affecting demographic stochasticity and sensitivity to environmental stochasticity, or rates of adaptation to novel conditions. Notably, these changes occurred largely independent from changes in population growth. Altogether, our results highlight changes in life history as an important but underappreciated consequence of environmental change.

ecology↗

A Practical Roadmap For Sampling Floral Nectar From Communities of Many Plant Species

O_LIFloral nectar plays a critical role in shaping the ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. Effective and efficient methods that allow for broad-scale sampling of nectar volume and sugar concentration across a diversity of taxa are needed to improve our understanding of many dimensions of mutualistic plant-pollinator interactions--including their basic ecology and evolution, their responses to environmental change, and their conservation and restoration. C_LIO_LIDespite the key importance of nectar for mediating plant-pollinator interactions, quantifying floral nectar in the field from many different plant species is challenging because there is often no one-size-fits-all sampling method that is effective across a diversity of floral structures and nectar traits. Different methods require different preparation, and sampling from many species involves a variety of logistical challenges. C_LIO_LIHere we provide a methodological roadmap for sampling floral nectar in the field from many different plant species. We describe our nectar collection methods in detail, including necessary equipment, calculations, and approaches appropriate for different floral morphologies. We also provide a troubleshooting guide for common problems encountered while collecting nectar in the field. To demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of our methods for collecting nectar from many different species, we present results on nectar trait variation from 53 species in an ecosystem. C_LIO_LIOur method illustrates that nectar traits vary considerably within and among plant species, indicating that large-scale nectar sampling projects are an important consideration for many basic and applied questions in pollination ecology and evolution. We hope that across many plant communities and ecosystems, our paper provides a practical roadmap for how to navigate the complexities of quantifying floral nectar traits. C_LI

ecology↗

The shifting importance of abiotic and biotic factors across the life cycles of wild pollinators

O_LIOrganisms living in seasonal environments are exposed to different environmental conditions as they transition from one life stage to the next across their life cycle. How different life stages respond to these varying conditions is a fundamental aspect of biology and is critical for understanding how organisms will respond to environmental change. C_LIO_LIDespite the importance of animal pollinators, we lack a basic understanding of the influence of different environmental factors across their life cycles. We investigated the relative importance of climate conditions, food availability, and previous life stage abundance in a community of wild bumble bee species, asking: how do these three factors influence bee abundance at each life stage? C_LIO_LIWe used a 7-year dataset to examine the importance of environmental conditions on the abundance of life stages in seven wild bumble bee species. We monitored climate conditions, the abundance of floral resources, and abundances of bees in each life stage across the active colony life cycle in a highly seasonal subalpine ecosystem in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. C_LIO_LIBee abundance at different life stages responded to environmental conditions in a consistent manner across the seven species. The survival and recruitment stage of the life cycle (assessed as abundance of overwintered queens) responded negatively to longer winters; the growth stage (assessed as abundance of workers) responded positively to floral resource availability; and the reproductive stage (assessed as abundance of males) was positively related to the abundance of the previous life stage (workers). C_LIO_LIOur long-term examination of annual bumble bees reveals a consistent set of responses in the abundance of each life stage to climate conditions, floral resource availability, and previous life stage abundance. Across species, these three factors each influenced a distinct life stage, illustrating how their relative importance can shift throughout the life cycle. The life-cycle approach we have taken with wild bumble bees highlights that important details about pollinator demography are overlooked without considering life stage-specific responses. Ultimately, it is these life-stage specific responses that shape population outcomes, not only for animal pollinators, but for many organisms living in seasonal environments. C_LI

ecology↗

The effects of experimental floral resource removal on plant-pollinator interactions

Pollination is essential for ecosystem functioning, yet our understanding of the empirical consequences of species loss for plant-pollinator interactions remains limited. It is hypothesized that the loss of abundant and generalized (well-connected) species from a pollination network will have a large effect on the remaining species and their interactions. However, to date, relatively few studies have experimentally removed species from their natural setting to address this hypothesis. We investigated the consequences of losing an abundant, well-linked species from a series of plant-pollinator networks by experimentally removing the flowers of Helianthella quinquenervis (Asteraceae) from half of a series of 10 paired plots (15 m diameter) within a subalpine ecosystem. We then asked how the localized loss of this species influenced pollinator visitation patterns, floral visitor composition, and interaction network structure. The experimental removal of Helianthella flowers led to an overall decline in plot-level pollinator visitation rates and shifts in pollinator composition. Species-level responses to floral removal differed between the two other abundant, co-flowering plants in our experiment: Potentilla pulcherrima received higher visitation rates, whereas Erigeron speciosus visitation rates did not change. Experimental floral removal altered the structural properties of the localized plant-pollinator networks such that they were more specialized, less nested, and less robust to further species loss. Such changes to interaction structure were consistently driven more by species turnover than by interaction rewiring. Our findings suggest that the local loss of an abundant, well-linked, generalist plant can bring about diverse responses within pollination networks, including potential competitive and facilitative effects for individual species, changes to network structure that may render them more sensitive to future change, but also numerous changes to interactions that may also suggest flexibility in response to species loss.

ecology↗

On the temporally flexible structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks

Ecological communities consist of species that are joined in complex networks of interspecific interaction. The interactions that networks depict often form and dissolve rapidly, but this temporal variation is not well integrated into our understanding of the causes and consequences of network structure. If interspecific interactions exhibit temporal flexibility across time periods over which organisms co-occur, then the emergent structure of the corresponding network may also be temporally flexible, something that a temporally-static perspective would miss. Here, we use an empirical system to examine short-term flexibility in network structure (connectance, nestedness, and specialization), and in individual species interactions that contribute to that structure. We investigated weekly plant-pollinator networks in a subalpine ecosystem across three summer growing seasons. To link the interactions of individual species to properties of their networks, we examined weekly temporal variation in species contributions to network structure. As a test of the potential robustness of networks to perturbation, we also simulated the random loss of species from weekly networks. We then compared the properties of weekly networks to the properties of cumulative networks that aggregate field observations over each full season. A week-to-week view reveals considerable flexibility in the interactions of individual species and their contributions to network structure. For example, species that would be considered relatively generalized across their entire activity period may be much more specialized at certain times, and at no point as generalized as the cumulative network may suggest. Furthermore, a week-to-week view reveals corresponding temporal flexibility in network structure and potential robustness throughout each summer growing season. We conclude that short-term flexibility in species interactions leads to short-term variation in network properties, and that a season-long, cumulative perspective may miss important aspects of the way in which species interact, with implications for understanding their ecology, evolution, and conservation.

ecology↗