bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Capshaw, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Capshaw, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Experience-Dependent Plasticity in Nucleus Laminaris of the Barn Owl

Barn owls experience increasing interaural time differences (ITDs) during development, because their head width more than doubles in the month after hatching. We therefore hypothesized that their ITD detection circuit might be modified by experience. To test this, we raised owls with unilateral ear inserts that delayed and attenuated the acoustic signal, then measured the ITD representation in the brainstem nucleus laminaris (NL) when they were adult. The ITD circuit is composed of delay line inputs to coincidence detectors, and we predicted that plastic changes would lead to shorter delays in the axons from the manipulated ear, and complementary shifts in ITD representation on the two sides. In owls that received ear inserts starting around P14, the maps of ITD shifted in the predicted direction, but only on the ipsilateral side, and only in those tonotopic regions that had not experienced auditory stimulation prior to insertion. The contralateral map did not change. Experience-dependent plasticity of the ITD circuit occurs in NL, and our data suggest that ipsilateral and contralateral delays are independently regulated. Thus, altered auditory input during development leads to long-lasting changes in the representation of ITD. Significance StatementThe early life of barn owls is marked by increasing sensitivity to sound, and by increasing ITDs. Their prolonged post-hatch development allowed us to examine the role of altered auditory experience on the development of ITD detection circuits. We raised owls with a unilateral ear insert and found that their maps of ITD were altered by experience, but only in those tonotopic regions that had not experienced auditory stimulation prior to insertion. Thus experience-induced plasticity allows the sound localization circuits to be customized to individual characteristics, such as the size of the head, and potentially to compensate for natural conductive hearing losses.

neuroscience↗

A general mechanism of air-borne hearing in Recent and early non-tympanate tetrapods

Tetrapod tympanic hearing probably emerged in the Triassic with independent origins in each of the major groups, more than 120 Myr after the water-land transition. During this long period, any auditory sensitivity must have been based on non-tympanic, bone conduction mechanisms. However, bone conduction is a non-specific term describing several different modes of vibration that can stimulate the inner ear. To understand hearing in a non-tympanic ear, we focus on the simplest model: that sound translates the head, i.e., that the head is pushed and pulled by the sound wave, and that this vibration is transduced by the inner ear. Simple translation is the mode of human low-frequency bone conduction sensitivity and translation by underwater sound is also the mode of auditory stimulation for most fishes. It is therefore a straightforward assumption that this may have been the mechanism of hearing in the early tetrapods. According to acoustic theory, the efficiency of translation of an object by sound is determined by its density and ka, the product of the acoustic wavenumber (k) and the radius (a) of the head. Simple finite-element models of translation by sound show that vibration velocities only depend on ka and density (for objects of the same shape and composition) and are almost constant (between 4 and 5 {micro}m/s/Pa depending on shape) for objects with ka<1. We compare sensitivity to sound and to vibrations of the skull in animals lacking tympanic middle ears (snakes, salamanders, earless frogs, and lungfish) and show that the low-frequency air-borne sound sensitivity in these species is largely consistent with a translation mechanism. How translation of the head or body can stimulate the inner ear is most evident in an inertial system like the otolithic/otoconial ears of fish and early tetrapods, but fluid inertia in the inner ear may also generate hydrodynamic waves that can stimulate hair cells in the tetrapod inner ear, providing a mechanism for this simple mode of sound reception to confer hearing in earless animals.

animal behavior and cognition↗