Capblancq, T. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2018

Double-digest RAD-sequencing: do wet and dry protocol parameters impact biological results?

O_LINext-generation sequencing technologies have opened a new era of research in genomics. Among these, restriction enzyme-based techniques such as restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) or double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRADseq) are now widely used in many population genomics fields. From DNA sampling to SNP calling, both wet and dry protocols have been discussed in the literature to identify key parameters for an optimal loci reconstruction.\nC_LIO_LIThe impact of these parameters on downstream analyses and biological results drawn from RADseq or ddRADseq data has however not been fully explored yet. In this study, we tackled this issue by investigating the effects of ddRADseq laboratory (i.e. wet protocol) and bioinformatics (i.e. dry protocol) settings on loci reconstruction and inferred biological signal at two evolutionary scale using two systems: a complex of butterfly species (Coenonympha sp.) and populations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica).\nC_LIO_LIResults suggest an impact of wet protocol parameters (DNA quantity, number of PCR cycles during library preparation) on the number of recovered reads and SNPs, the number of unique alleles and individual heterozygosity. We also found that bioinformatic settings (i.e. clustering and minimum coverage thresholds) impact loci reconstruction (e.g. number of loci, mean coverage) and SNP calling (e.g. number of SNPs, heterozygosity). We however do not detect an impact of parameter settings on three types of analysis performed with ddRADseq data: measure of genetic differentiation, estimation of individual admixture, and demographic inferences. In addition, our work demonstrates the high reproducibility and low rate of genotyping inconsistencies of the ddRADseq protocol.\nC_LIO_LIThus, our study highlights the impact of wet parameters on ddRADseq protocol with strong consequences on experimental success and biological conclusions. Dry parameters affects loci reconstruction and descriptive statistics but not biological conclusion for the two studied systems. Overall, this study illustrates, with others, the relevance of ddRADseq for population and evolutionary genomics at the inter- or intraspecific scales.\nC_LI

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

How to make use of ordination methods to identify local adaptation: a comparison of genome scans based on PCA and RDA

Ordination is a common tool in ecology that aims at representing complex biological information in a reduced space. In landscape genetics, ordination methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) have been used to detect adaptive variation based on genomic data. Taking advantage of environmental data in addition to genotype data, redundancy analysis (RDA) is another ordination approach that is useful to detect adaptive variation. This paper aims at proposing a test statistic based on RDA to search for loci under selection. We compare redundancy analysis to pcadapt, which is a nonconstrained ordination method, and to a latent factor mixed model (LFMM), which is a univariate genotype-environment association method. Individual-based simulations identify evolutionary scenarios where RDA genome scans have a greater statistical power than genome scans based on PCA. By constraining the analysis with environmental variables, RDA performs better than PCA in identifying adaptive variation when selection gradients are weakly correlated with population structure. Additionally, we show that if RDA and LFMM have a similar power to identify genetic markers associated with environmental variables, the RDA-based procedure has the advantage to identify the main selective gradients as a combination of environmental variables. To give a concrete illustration of RDA in population genomics, we apply this method to the detection of outliers and selective gradients on an SNP data set of Populus trichocarpa (Geraldes et al., 2013). The RDA-based approach identifies the main selective gradient contrasting southern and coastal populations to northern and continental populations in the northwestern American coast.

genomics↗