Canizales, I. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Comparative Morphometric Analysis Of Captive Jaguars Vs. Wild Jaguars (Panthera onca) In Venezuela

In Venezuela the oldest, although anecdotical, record known of a captive jaguar is a male in the city of Maracay between 1918 and 1935. Body measurements were made on 22 jaguars kept in Venezuelan zoos between 1996 and 2009 to provide data on external morphometrics and compare with the measurements of 25 free-living animals, published by Hoogesteijn and Mondolfi (1992) and determine whether there are significant differences in the morphology between sexes of captive and free-living animals. The evaluation of morphometric variation was focused on three body measurements and body weight: Head-and-body length (HBL) and Tail length (Tl). Total body length (TBL) was calculated by adding HBL and Tl. Body weight (BW) was determined using a clock scale to the nearest gramme/kilogram. To determine the values all animals were anesthetized. The sexes were analyzed separately. All data were used for the calculation of descriptive statistics. Student t-tests were used with a significance level 0.05 to establish if there is a significant difference between the measurements and weights of the sexes. The TBL and HBL in captive males were observed to be 8.78% and 12.13%, respectively, less than that of free-living males. A principal components analysis made it possible to assess the variability between HBL, TBL, and BW between sexes and between free-living/wild and captive animals. This study showed no significant differences in the BW of captives and wild females. Some captive males jaguars in this study may be thinner than normal, because of their diet and others may be fatter because of the lack of physical activity imposed by captivity. Body mass index (BMI) was used to contrast the difference in the average mass of each sex in both captive and free-living animals. Simple linear regressions and correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between body mass and male/female size. According to correlation coefficients, the change in weight that can be attributed to the ratio of weight to body length is 8.55 % for males and 9.83 % for females.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2020

Diminutive, degraded but dissimilar: Wolbachia genomes from filarial nematodes do not conform to a single paradigm

Wolbachia are alpha-proteobacteria symbionts infecting a large range of arthropod species and two different families of nematodes. Interestingly, these endosymbionts are able to induce diverse phenotypes in their hosts: they are reproductive parasites within many arthropods, nutritional mutualists within some insects and obligate mutualists within their filarial nematode hosts. Defining Wolbachia "species" is controversial and so they are commonly classified into 16 different phylogenetic lineages, termed supergroups, named A to S. However, available genomic data remains limited and not representative of the full Wolbachia diversity; indeed, of the 24 complete genomes and 55 draft genomes of Wolbachia available to date, 84% belong to supergroups A and B, exclusively composed of Wolbachia from arthropods. For the current study, we took advantage of a recently developed DNA enrichment method to produce four complete genomes and two draft genomes of Wolbachia from filarial nematodes. Two complete genomes, wCtub and wDcau, are the smallest Wolbachia genomes sequenced to date (863,988bp and 863,427bp, respectively), as well as the first genomes representing supergroup J. These genomes confirm the validity of this supergroup, a controversial clade due to weaknesses of the multi-locus system typing (MLST) approach. We also produced the first draft Wolbachia genome from a supergroup F filarial nematode representative (wMhie), two genomes from supergroup D (wLsig and wLbra) and the complete genome of wDimm from supergroup C. Our new data confirm the paradigm of smaller Wolbachia genomes from filarial nematodes containing low levels of transposable elements and the absence of intact bacteriophage sequences, unlike many Wolbachia from arthropods, where both are more abundant. However, we observe differences among the Wolbachia genomes from filarial nematodes: no global co-evolutionary pattern, strong synteny between supergroup C and supergroup J Wolbachia, and more transposable elements observed in supergroup D Wolbachia compared to the other supergroups. Metabolic pathway analysis indicates several highly conserved pathways (haem and nucleotide biosynthesis for example) as opposed to more variable pathways, such as vitamin B biosynthesis, which might be specific to certain host-symbiont associations. Overall, there appears to be no single Wolbachia- filarial nematode pattern of co-evolution or symbiotic relationship. Graphical abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY RepositoriesData generated are available in GenBank: BioProject PRJNA593581; BioSample SAMN13482485 for wLsig, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Litomosoides sigmodontis (genome: CP046577); Biosample SAMN15190311 for the nematode host Litomosoides sigmodontis (genome: JABVXW000000000); BioSample SAMN13482488 for wDimm, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Dirofilaria (D.) immitis (genome: CP046578); Biosample SAMN15190314 for the nematode host Dirofilaria (D.) immitis (genome: JABVXT000000000); BioSample SAMN13482046 for wCtub, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Cruorifilaria tuberocauda (genome: CP046579); Biosample SAMN15190313 for the nematode host Cruorifilaria tuberocauda (genome: JABVXU000000000); BioSample SAMN13482057 for wDcau, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Dipetalonema caudispina (genome: CP046580); Biosample SAMN15190312 for the nematode host Dipetalonema caudispina (genome: JABVXV000000000); BioSample SAMN13482459 for wLbra, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Litomosoides brasiliensis (genome: WQM000000000); Biosample SAMN15190311 for the nematode host Litomosoides brasiliensis (genome: JABVXW000000000); BioSample SAMN13482487 for wMhie, Wolbachia endosymbiont of Madathamugadia hiepei (genome: WQMP00000000); Biosample SAMN15190315 for the nematode host Madathamugadia hiepei (genome: JABVXS000000000). The raw data are available in GenBank as Sequence Read Archive (SRA): SRR10903008 to SRR10903010; SRR10902913 to SRR10902914; SRR10900508 to SRR10900511; SRR10898805 to SRR10898806. Data summaryThe authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Eleven Supplementary tables and two supplementary files are available with the online version of this article. Impact StatementWolbachia are endosymbiotic bacteria infecting a large range of arthropod species and two different families of nematodes, characterized by causing diverse phenotypes in their hosts, ranging from reproductive parasitism to mutualism. While available Wolbachia genomic data are increasing, they are not representative of the full Wolbachia diversity; indeed, 84% of Wolbachia genomes available on the NCBI database to date belong to the two main studied clades (supergroups A and B, exclusively composed of Wolbachia from arthropods). The present study presents the assembly and analysis of four complete genomes and two draft genomes of Wolbachia from filarial nematodes. Our genomics comparisons confirm the paradigm that smaller Wolbachia genomes from filarial nematodes contain low levels of transposable elements and the absence of intact bacteriophage sequences, unlike many Wolbachia from arthropods. However, data show disparities among the Wolbachia genomes from filarial nematodes: no single pattern of co-evolution, stronger synteny between some clades (supergroups C and supergroup J) and more transposable elements in another clade (supergroup D). Metabolic pathway analysis indicates both highly conserved and more variable pathways, such as vitamin B biosynthesis, which might be specific to certain host-symbiont associations. Overall, there appears to be no single Wolbachia-filarial nematode pattern of symbiotic relationship.

genomics↗