bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Canitrot, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Canitrot, Y..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Direct effects on gene transcription revealed by global and CRISPR-targeted oxidative DNA damage

Oxidative stress induces rapid expression changes of specific genes. However, whether these changes are due to direct and local DNA oxidation and whether they depend on the repair machinery is still debated. Here, we show by total RNA-Seq that upon oxidative stress, many genes are either rapidly repressed or activated. The early transcriptional response also includes the activation of many read-through RNAs. Importantly, degradation of the endogenous OGG1 DNA glycosylase showed that the early repression of these genes partially depends on OGG1, therefore demonstrating that these genome expression changes are due to the processing of oxidized DNA. We further demonstrate by ChIPseq against total or S5-phosphorylated RNA polymerase II that transcriptional regulation by oxidative stress involves changes in the recruitment of RNA polymerase II to transcription start sites. Finally, through the use of a chemoptogenetic system allowing the targeting of ROS to chosen genomic loci, we were able to reproduce repression of some genes through the local induction of oxidative DNA damage at their promoters, demonstrating that local DNA oxidation directly affects transcription of genes. Altogether, our results show that local oxidative DNA damage leads to alterations in the activity of specific promoters by a mechanism dependent on repair processes.

genomics↗

Mammalian RAD51 prevents non-conservative alternative end-joining and single strand annealing through non-catalytic mechanismssms

The selection of the DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair pathway is decisive for genetic stability/instability. We proposed that it acts according to two successive steps: 1-canonical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) versus single-strand DNA (ssDNA) resection; 2- on ssDNA, gene conversion (GC) versus non-conservative single-strand annealing (SSA) or alternative end-joining (A-EJ).\n\nUsing intramolecular substrates, we systematically analysed the equilibrium between the different DSB repair pathways. We show that ablation of RAD51 stimulated both SSA and A-EJ but did not stimulate C-NHEJ, validating the two-step model. Moreover, we found that two ATP-mutant dominant-negative forms of RAD51 that stimulated non-conservative repair, failed to load into damaged chromatin, clarifying the role of ATP in RAD51-mediated HR, also. In contrast, another dominant-negative form of RAD51, which retains its DNA binding capacities, repressed SSA and A-EJ, revealing two separable functions of RAD51 i.e. GC and non-conservative repair inhibition. In vitro assays show that the binding of RAD51 on both complementary ssDNA is required to block both spontaneous and RAD52-induced strand annealing. Therefore, RAD51 represses non-conservative repair (SSA and A-EJ), by inhibiting the annealing step through ssDNA occupancy, independently of the catalytic strand-exchange activity required for GC.

molecular biology↗