Canario, E. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

Intracortical BCI Performance is Robust to Changes in Attentional Load During Dual-Tasking

High performance intracortical brain-computer interface (iBCI) control has been demonstrated in research settings, but performance can still vary within and between sessions. One potential source of this variability is the change in attentional load that comes from processing naturally occurring distractors such as thoughts, sounds, fatigue, or pain. To improve the consistency of iBCI performance in real-world environments where this sort of multi-tasking is inevitable, we must understand how shifts in attention can impact performance. Here we examined the effect of attentional load on iBCI performance and movement-related neural activity using a 2D cursor translation + click iBCI task paired with an N-Back working memory task to increase attentional load during dual-task performance. Two participants (P2 and P4) with tetraplegia completed the study while enrolled in a long-term clinical trial of an iBCI device (NCT1894802). Common neural correlates of attention (theta and alpha band power) were measured with simultaneously recorded scalp electroencephalography (EEG). While the EEG recordings and difficulty ratings suggested increased attentional load during dual tasking, iBCI performance was quite robust across the various dual tasking conditions. One participant, P2, experienced a small but significant increase in trial completion time and normalized path length during the mild attentional load condition. Signal quality differences between the two participants may have impacted the results, as P2 had lower signal quality and was therefore likely more vulnerable to attentional load. P4s higher signal quality likely allowed him to accommodate increased attentional load without a drop in performance. Overall, iBCI performance appears to be robust to attentional load, but the complex trends observed here reflect a need for continued investigation of BCI use under different cognitive states to elucidate potential challenges and compensatory mechanisms across participants.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2026

Closed-loop error damping in human BCI using pre-error motor cortex activity

Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are used to decode motor intent from neural population activity; their main clinical application is to restore function for individuals with motor or communication deficits. However, when trying to reconstruct movement trajectories, such as in computer cursor control, even state-of-the-art decoders fall short of able-bodied performance during online BCI control. This calls for alternative approaches to improve the usability of motor BCIs. Here, we leveraged an error signal, i.e. a neural correlate of faulty motor control that can be detected from neural activity. By detecting this error signal in parallel to performing movement decoding, it is possible to perform error modulation, i.e. real-time error detection and correction during a closed-loop motor BCI task. We analyzed data from four individuals with upper limb impairment due to cervical spinal cord injury who each used an intracortical BCI to perform a continuous cursor control task with visual feedback. A classifier was trained to detect the error signal and was used to perform online error detection during BCI control to limit ongoing errors (defined as movement of the controller away from its target) without requiring any specific action from the participants. Our contribution is three-fold. First, we show that the error signal has a pre-error component. Cortical activity was already significantly modulated before the onset of the kinematically-defined error, theoretically allowing for earlier detection. Second, we show that error modulation significantly improves performance during online BCI control of cursor kinematics. Finally, we show that the error signal can be robustly leveraged across contexts, as error modulation improves performance in more complex motor tasks (involving for instance grasp and drag actions) or other environments without task-specific calibration. Overall, our results suggest that the error signal can be robustly disentangled from motor intent in cortical activity, and that even a simple linear classifier can enable error modulation in parallel to a continuous kinematic decoder, yielding more reliable and accurate BCI control.

neuroscience↗