bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Campos Clemente, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Campos Clemente, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tissue Factor Expression in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Marker of HPV-Independent Disease

In a series of 33-patients, we evaluated tissue factor (TF) expression in penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed with 3 cores per patient tumor (99 total cores). Anti-TF antibody staining was performed by immunohistochemistry and H-scores for membrane and cytoplasm staining were assessed (range 0-300). Percentage of cores and patient tumors staining positive for TF ([&ge;]10% of tumor cells with at least 1+ intensity in cytoplasm and/or membrane) and H-scores were described and compared with HPV and p16 status. Association of TF expression with tumor grade, presence of metastatic disease, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), aberrant p53 expression, recurrence free survival (RFS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were assessed. Nectin-4 and TROP2 staining and their association with clinical/pathological data was determined in a similar manner. TF staining was more prominent in HPV-negative tumors in both the membrane (H-score 69.6 vs 18.8; p=0.003) and cytoplasm (H-score 59.2 vs. 17.7, p=0.007). Cytoplasmic (H-score 61.7 vs 11.7, p=<0.001) and membrane TF staining (H-score 71.7 vs 15.0, p=<0.001) favored p16 negative tumors. The p53 status was more likely to be aberrant in the higher TF staining samples (cytoplasm H-score 61.7 vs 18.3, p=0.012; membrane H-score 67.5 vs 20.3, p=0.006). We observed an association with TROP2 staining and positive p16 status (membrane H-score 120.3 vs. 85, p=0.052; cytoplasmic H-score 135 vs. 107.5, p=0.041). We observed an association of TROP2 staining with positive LVI (membrane H-score 136.7 vs. 66.7, p=0.014; cytoplasmic H-score 110 vs. 93.3, p=0.04). We found no association between TF, TROP2, or nectin-4 staining with CSS or RFS; however, we suspect that this is due to our small sample size. Our results indicate that TF expression could be positive biomarker for HPV-independent, p53-aberrant PSCC, while TROP2 could be associated with HPV-associated PSCC.

pathology↗

FLASH radiotherapy spares lymphocytes in tumor-draining lymph nodes and increases infiltration of immune cells in tumors

Radiotherapy (RT) delivered at conventional dose rates (CONV) can both stimulate antitumor immune responses and inhibit these immune responses by depleting circulating lymphocytes. Given the observed normal tissue sparing associated with ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) RT, we hypothesized that FLASH RT may protect lymphocytes while increasing the immunogenicity of cancer cells. We irradiated cancer cell lines in vitro with FLASH RT or CONV RT and assessed immunogenic mRNA and protein expression. Both HPV-positive cell lines MEER and TC-1 showed upregulation of Calr, Hmgb1, and cGAS-STING family members after FLASH RT but not after CONV RT in vitro. To assess changes in lymphocyte populations, we irradiated murine mEER tumors in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice with 27 Gy in 3 fractions of FLASH RT or CONV RT. In mice bearing FLASH irradiated tumors, tumor-draining lymph nodes contained greater numbers of CD8+ T cells (FLASH 1.7x104 vs 0.8x104 CONV; P<0.001) and CD4+ T cells (FLASH 2.3x104 vs CONV 1.2x104; P<0.001) after irradiation. FLASH RT was associated with increased numbers of activated CD44+CD62LloCD8+ and CD4+ lymphocytes. In irradiated tumors, FLASH RT was associated with increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, increased PD1 expression on these lymphocytes and increased PDL1 expression on macrophages. Compared with CONV RT, FLASH RT spared activated T cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes and in tumors but increased checkpoint inhibitor expression in tumors. These results suggest that FLASH RT may enhance antitumor immune responses by maintaining the immunogenic effects of RT while preserving lymphocyte numbers, which may be augmented with immune checkpoint blockade. SignificanceRadiation-induced lymphopenia is associated with poorer survival outcomes. New treatment approaches, like FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH RT), which reduce lymphopenia and enhance the antitumor response, could potentially lead to better outcomes for cancer patients.

cancer biology↗