Biology subjects

Calhoun, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Calhoun, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

What is behavior? No seriously, what is it?

Studying behavior lies at the heart of many disciplines. Nevertheless, academics rarely provide an explicit definition of what behavior actually is. What range of definitions do people use, and how does that vary across disciplines? To answer these questions we have developed a survey to probe what constitutes behavior. We find that academics adopt different definitions of behavior according to their academic discipline, animal model that they work with, and level of academic seniority. Using hierarchical clustering, we identify at least six distinct types of behavior which are used in seven distinct operational archetypes of behavior. Individual respondents have clear consistent definitions of behavior, but these definitions are not consistent across the population. Our study is a call for academics to clarify what they mean by behavior wherever they study it, with the hope that this will foster interdisciplinary studies that will improve our understanding of behavioral phenomena.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2020

S-nitrosylated and non-nitrosylated COX2 has differential expression and distinct subcellular localization in normal and breast cancer tissue

Immunohistochemical staining in breast cancer shows both gain and loss of COX2 expression with disease risk and progression. We investigated four common COX2 antibody clones and found high specificity for purified human COX2 for three clones; however, recognition of COX2 in cell lysates was clone dependent. Biochemical characterization revealed two distinct forms of COX2, with SP21 recognizing an S-nitrosylated form and CX229 and CX294 appearing to recognize the same non-nitrosylated COX2 antigen. We found S-nitrosylated and non-nitrosylated COX2 occupy different subcellular locations in normal and breast cancer tissue, implicating distinct synthetic/trafficking pathways and function. Dual stains of ~2000 breast cancer cases show early onset breast cancer has increased expression of both forms of COX2 compared to postmenopausal cases. Our results highlight the strengths of using multiple, highly characterized antibody clones for COX2 immunohistochemical studies and raise the prospect that S-nitrosylation of COX2 may play a role in breast cancer biology.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Reported Drosophila Courtship Song Rhythms Remain Data Analysis Artifacts

From 1980 to 1992, a series of influential papers reported on the discovery, genetics, and evolution of a periodic cycling of the interval between Drosophila male courtship song pulses. The molecular mechanisms underlying this periodicity were never described. To reinitiate investigation of this phenomenon, we performed automated segmentation of songs, but failed to detect the proposed periodicity [Arthur BJ et al. (2013) BMC Biol 11:11; Stern DL (2014) BMC Biol 12:38]. Kyriacou CP et al. [(2017) PNAS 114:1970-1975] report that we failed to detect song rhythms because i) our flies did not sing enough and ii) our segmenter did not identify many of the song pulses. Kyriacou et al. manually annotated a subset of our recordings and reported that two strains displayed rhythms with genotype-specific periodicity, in agreement with their original reports. We cannot replicate this finding and show that the manually-annotated data, the original automatically segmented data, and a new data set provide no evidence for either the existence of song rhythms or song periodicity differences between genotypes. Furthermore, we have re-examined our methods and analysis and find that our automated segmentation method was not biased to prevent detection of putative song periodicity. We conclude that there is currently no evidence for the existence of Drosophila courtship song rhythms.\n\nSignificance statementPrevious studies have reported that male vinegar flies sing courtship songs with a periodic rhythm of approximately 55 seconds. Several years ago, we showed that we could not replicate this observation. Recently, the original authors have claimed that we failed to find rhythms because 1) our flies did not sing enough and 2) our software for detecting song did not detect all song events. They claimed that they could detect rhythms in song annotated by hand. We report here that we cannot replicate their observation of rhythms in the hand-annotated data or in any dataset and that our original methods were not biased against detecting rhythms. We conclude that song rhythms cannot be detected.

animal behavior and cognition↗