Biology subjects

Cadotte, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Cadotte, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Forest biodiversity benefits from warmer microclimate, but only in colder regions

The diversity of many forest-dwelling organisms depends on forest structure, but it remains unknown to which degree this is mediated by microclimatic temperature, and whether microclimatic buffering is universally beneficial for forest biodiversity. In 234 broad-leaved forest plots across nine climatically differing regions in Germany, we measured micro- and macroclimatic temperatures, canopy cover, and deadwood volume after experimental manipulations of forest structure through thinning operations and gap cuts. We surveyed 21 taxonomic groups, representing plants, bacteria, fungi, and animals, to assess how their diversity depended on the predictors. Multi-taxon diversity, and diversity of ten separate taxonomic groups, increased from closed to open canopies. Only necrophagous beetles were more diverse in closed stands. These effects of canopy cover on diversity were partly mediated by microclimatic temperatures. Thereby, diversity responses to microclimatic temperature depended on the macroclimatic context. In regions with colder summers, locally warmer microclimates in canopy gaps had strong positive effects on biodiversity, while these effects were not found in regions with warmer summers. Consequently, management strategies aimed at multi-taxon forest diversity conservation should be chosen based on the regional climate, favoring canopy gaps primarily in colder regions, and taking future climate warming into consideration.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Old growth attributes by chain saw: how between-patch heterogeneity changes the metacommunities of beetles in temperate forests

Metacommunity theory has expanded our understanding of how spatial dynamics and local interactions influence species communities. Different assembly archetypes, reflecting different roles of species differences, habitat differences, and dispersal have been described, but we lack empirical studies specifically in terrestrial habitats testing which archetype is most important. In a replicated design we experimentally enhanced structural between-patch heterogeneity in homogeneous production forests and developed a statistical framework controlling for sample incompleteness to detect different metacommunity processes. Meta-analyses on >100K individuals of >1.3K beetle species showed an increase of [~]60 species in heterogenized forests at {gamma}-level promoted by increasing -diversity consistent with the mass-effect and an increase of {beta}-diversity by [~]10% supporting species-sorting. Additionally, we tested {beta}-deviations from random assembly as a proxy of neutral processes. Findings indicate that enhancing structural heterogeneity can shift forests from patch-dynamics dominance towards mass-effect and species-sorting, offering a promising pathway to restore biodiversity in managed landscapes.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Higher bat and bird γ-diversity in structurally complex forests is driven by distinct α- and β-diversity responses

Effective conservation management and habitat restoration rely on understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental change. Centuries of silviculture have homogenized forests and their species communities globally, reducing biodiversity. To test whether restoring forest structural complexity can promote biodiversity, we conducted a large-scale, spatially explicit landscape experiment. At 11 sites across Germany, we compared bat and bird diversity in forests with experimentally enhanced heterogeneity by increasing deadwood and canopy complexity to homogeneous production forests. Both taxa were investigated by autonomous acoustic recorders and automatic species identification. We quantified within-patch (-), between-patch ({beta}-), and landscape-level ({gamma}-) diversity, emphasizing infrequent to highly frequent species for taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity. The pairwise comparisons of the sites were synthesized using a newly developed meta-analysis of rarefaction-extrapolation curves. {gamma}-diversity increased significantly in structurally heterogeneous forests for both taxa, albeit through distinct taxon-specific mechanisms. Bat {gamma}-diversity gains were primarily driven by higher {beta}-diversity, indicating greater dissimilarity in species assemblages among patches, while bird {gamma}-diversity increased via higher -diversity within patches. Bat diversity increases were mainly taxonomic, suggesting functional similarity in the communities, whereas birds showed the highest gains in functional diversity, indicating that experimental treatments resulted in greater trait dissimilarity. Our results provide experimental evidence under real-world conditions that {gamma}-diversity can be shaped by different diversity mechanisms. These patterns likely originate from differences in activity ranges, such as the large-scale movements of foraging bats in contrast to the more spatially restricted, territorial behavior of birds. This highlights the need for taxon-specific restoration strategies in homogenized landscapes.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Is phylogenetic diversity a surrogate for functional diversity across clades and space?

In the face of the biodiversity crisis, it is argued that we should prioritize species in order to capture high functional diversity (FD). Because species traits often reflect shared evolutionary history, many researchers have advocated for a \"phylogenetic gambit\": maximizing phylogenetic diversity (PD) should indirectly capture FD. For the first time, we empirically test this gambit using data from >15,000 vertebrate species and ecologically-relevant traits. Maximizing PD results in an average gain of 18% of FD relative to random choice. However, this average gain hides the fact that in over 1/3 of the comparisons, maximum PD sets contain less FD than randomly chosen sets of species. These results suggest that, while maximizing PD protection can help to protect FD, it represents a risky strategy.\n\nStatement of authorshipFM, MP, MC, SD, GVDR, RG, AOM, CT and WP conceived the design of the study. FM and GVDR conducted the analysis. FM, RG, MP and WP interpreted the results and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors edited the final version.\n\nData accessibility statementMost of the data is publicly available (see methods). The Fish data is available upon request.\n\nCode accessibility statementR functions developed in this paper are available at https://github.com/FloMazel/FD_PD_Max

ecology↗