bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Buttitta, L. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Buttitta, L. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Oncogenic signaling in the adult Drosophila prostate-like accessory gland leads to activation of a conserved pro-tumorigenic program, in the absence of proliferation.

Drosophila models for tumorigenesis and metastasis have revealed conserved mechanisms of signaling that are also involved in mammalian cancer. Many of these models use the proliferating tissues of the larval stages of Drosophila development, when tissues are highly mitotically active, or stem cells are abundant. Fewer Drosophila tumorigenesis models use adult animals to initiate tumor formation when many tissues are largely terminally differentiated and postmitotic. The Drosophila accessory glands are prostate-like tissues and a model for some aspects of prostate tumorigenesis using this tissue has been explored. In this model, oncogenic signaling was induced during the proliferative stage of accessory gland development, raising the question of how oncogenic activity would impact the terminally differentiated and postmitotic adult tissue. Here, we show that oncogenic signaling in the adult Drosophila accessory gland leads to activation of a conserved pro-tumorigenic program, similar to that observed in mitotic larval tissues, but in the absence of proliferation. Oncogenic signaling in the adult postmitotic gland leads to tissue hyperplasia with nuclear anaplasia and aneuploidy through endoreduplication, which increases polyploidy and occasionally results in non-mitotic neoplastic-like extrusions. We compare gene expression changes in our Drosophila model with that of endocycling prostate cancer cells induced by chemotherapy, which potentially mediate tumor recurrence after treatment. Similar signaling pathways are activated in the Drosophila gland and endocycling cancer cells, suggesting the adult accessory glands provide a useful model for aspects of prostate cancer progression that do not involve cellular proliferation.

developmental biology↗

Transcriptional repression and enhancer decommissioning silence cell cycle genes in postmitotic tissues.

The mechanisms that maintain a non-cycling status in postmitotic tissues are not well understood. Many cell cycle genes have promoters and enhancers that remain accessible even when cells are terminally differentiated and in a non-cycling state, suggesting their repression must be maintained long term. In contrast, enhancer decommissioning has been observed for rate-limiting cell cycle genes in the Drosophila wing, a tissue where the cells die soon after eclosion, but it has been unclear if this also occurs in other contexts of terminal differentiation. In this study, we show that enhancer decommissioning also occurs at specific, rate-limiting cell cycle genes in the long-lived tissues of the Drosophila eye and brain, and we propose this loss of chromatin accessibility may help maintain a robust postmitotic state. We examined the decommissioned enhancers at specific rate-limiting cell cycle genes and show that they encode dynamic temporal and spatial expression patterns that include shared, as well as tissue-specific elements, resulting in broad gene expression with developmentally controlled temporal regulation. We extend our analysis to cell cycle gene expression and chromatin accessibility in the mammalian retina using a published dataset, and find that the principles of cell cycle gene regulation identified in terminally differentiating Drosophila tissues are conserved in the differentiating mammalian retina. We propose a robust, non-cycling status is maintained in long-lived postmitotic tissues through a combination of stable repression at most cell cycle gens, alongside enhancer decommissioning at specific rate-limiting cell cycle genes. HighlightsIn long-lived postmitotic Drosophila tissues, most cell cycle genes retain accessible chromatin despite persistent transcriptional downregulation. Cell cycle genes with accessible enhancers remain activatable during terminal differentiation, suggesting their repression must be continuously maintained in the postmitotic state. Long-lived postmitotic tissues decommission enhancers at specific, rate-limiting cell cycle genes in a developmentally regulated manner. Genome-wide enhancer identification performed in cell culture misses many developmentally dynamic enhancers in vivo. Decommissioned enhancers at cell cycle genes include shared and tissue-specific elements that in combination, result in broad gene expression with temporal regulation. The principles of cell cycle gene regulation identified in Drosophila are conserved in the mammalian retina.

developmental biology↗

Mis-regulation of the Nucleoporins 98 and 96 lead to defects in protein synthesis that promote hallmarks of tumorigenesis.

The Nucleoporin 98KD (Nup98) is one of the most promiscuous translocation partners in hematological malignancies, contributing to at least 31 different truncation-fusion proteins. To date, nearly all disease models of Nup98 translocations involve ectopic expression of transgenes recapitulating the fusion protein under study, leaving the endogenous Nup98 loci unperturbed. Overlooked in these approaches is that translocation leads to the loss of one copy of normal Nup98 in addition to the loss of Nup96 - a second Nucleoporin encoded within the same mRNA and reading frame as Nup98. Nup98 and 96 are also mutated in a number of other cancer types and are located near a tumor suppressor region known to be epigenetically silenced, suggesting that their disruption is not limited to blood cancers. We found that reducing Nup98-96 function via an RNAi approach in Drosophila melanogaster (where the Nup98-96 shared mRNA and reading frame gene structure is conserved) de-regulates the cell cycle. We find evidence of over-proliferation in Nup98-96 deficient tissues, counteracted by elevated apoptosis and aberrant Wingless and JNK signaling associated with chronic wound healing. When the knockdown of Nup98-96 is combined with inhibition of apoptosis, we see synergism leading to dramatic tissue overgrowth, consistent with a tumor-suppressor function for endogenous Nup98 and 96. To understand how growth and proliferation become mis-regulated when Nup98-96 levels are reduced, we performed RNAseq and uncovered a gene expression signature consistent with defects in ribosome biogenesis. We found that reducing Nup 98 and 96 function limits nuclear export of the ribosome component RpL10A, leading to defects in protein synthesis. Defects in protein synthesis are sufficient to trigger JNK signaling that contributes to compensatory proliferation and hallmarks of tumorigenesis when apoptosis is inhibited. Based upon our data, we suggest that the partial loss of Nup98 and Nup96 function in translocations could de-regulate protein synthesis leading to stress signaling that cooperates with other mutations in cancer to promote tumorigenesis. HighlightsO_LICompromising Nups 98 and 96 triggers cell death and compensatory proliferation via JNK signaling that becomes tumorigenic when apoptosis is blocked C_LIO_LIReducing Nup 98 and 96 function limits nuclear export of the ribosome stalk component RpL10A, leading to defects in protein synthesis which cause stress signaling via JNK. C_LIO_LIReduced protein synthesis coupled with increased JNK signaling, paradoxically leads to more rapid proliferation with a gene expression signature that resembles a chronic wounding response. C_LIO_LIOverexpression of Nup98, which occurs in oncogenic fusions, leads to similar defects in protein synthesis and JNK activation. C_LI

developmental biology↗

Developing Future Biologists: creating and assessing a portable short course to engage underrepresented undergraduate students in developmental biology

Many barriers discourage underrepresented students from pursuing science careers. To access graduate education, undergraduate students must first gain exposure to a particular subject and subsequently accumulate related coursework and research experience. Many underrepresented students lack exposure to developmental biology due to limited undergraduate course offerings and finite resources at smaller institutions. To address this disparity, a group of University of Michigan graduate students and postdoctoral fellows created a portable short course focusing on developmental biology, titled \"Developing Future Biologists\" (DFB). This weeklong educational initiative provides hands-on laboratory sessions, interactive lectures, and professional development workshops to teach students about developmental biology and increase awareness of scientific career options. To evaluate course effectiveness, we developed a pre-post assessment, incorporating main ideas from the BioCore Guide. Student understanding of basic concepts and perceived experience in developmental biology increased in DFB participants, despite the abbreviated nature of the course. Here, we provide all course materials and an in-depth analysis of the assessment we created. The DFB portable short course model is an easily adaptable tool that connects undergraduate students with opportunities for advanced study and lowers barriers for underrepresented students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

scientific communication and education↗