Buros, J. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2022

Orally active mGluR2/3 metabotropic antagonist pro-drug mimics the beneficial effects of physical exercise on neurogenesis, behavior, and exercise-related molecular pathways in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model

Modulation of physical activity represents an important intervention that may delay, slow, or prevent mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to Alzheimers disease (AD). One mechanism proposed to underlie the beneficial effect of physical exercise involves the apparent stimulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN). BCI-838 is a pro-drug whose active metabolite BCI-632 is an antagonist at the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR2/3). We previously demonstrated that administration of BCI-838 to a mouse model of cerebrovascular accumulation of oligomeric A{beta}E22Q (APPE693Q = "Dutch APP") reduced learning behavior impairment and anxiety, both of which are associated with the phenotype of the Dutch APP mice. Here we show that (i) administration of BCI-838, physical exercise, or a combination of BCI-838 and physical exercise enhanced AHN in a four-month old mouse model of AD amyloid pathology (APPKM670/671NL/ PSEN1{Delta}exon9 = APP/PS1), (ii) administration of BCI-838 alone or associated with physical exercise led to stimulation of AHN and improvement in both spatial and recognition memory, (iii) significantly, the hippocampal dentate gyrus transcriptome of APP/PS1 mice following BCI-838 treatment up-regulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), PIK3C2A of the PI3K-MTOR pathway, and metabotropic glutamate receptors, and down-regulated EIF5A of ketamine-modulating mTOR activity, and finally (iv) qPCR findings validate a significantly strong association between increased BDNF levels and BCI-838 treatment. Our study points to BCI-838 as a safe and orally active compound capable of mimicking the beneficial effect of exercise on AHN, learning behavior, and anxiety in a mouse model of AD neuropathology.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2016

Chemotherapy weakly contributes to predicted neoantigen expression in ovarian cancer

BackgroundPatients with highly mutated tumors, such as melanoma or smoking-related lung cancer, have higher rates of response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy, perhaps due to increased neoantigen expression. Many chemotherapies including platinum compounds are known to be mutagenic, but the impact of standard treatment protocols on mutational burden and resulting neoantigen expression in most human cancers is unknown.\n\nMethodsWe sought to quantify the effect of chemotherapy treatment on computationally predicted neoantigen expression for 12 high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) patients with pre- and post-chemotherapy samples collected in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. We additionally analyzed 16 patients from the cohort with post-treatment samples only, including five primary surgical samples exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our approach integrates tumor whole genome and RNA sequencing with class I MHC binding prediction and mutational signatures of chemotherapy exposure extracted from two preclinical studies.\n\nResultsThe mutational signatures for cisplatin and cyclophosphamide identified in a preclinical model had significant but inexact associations with the relevant exposure in the clinical samples. In an analysis stratified by tissue type (solid tumor or ascites), relapse samples collected after chemotherapy harbored a median of 90% more expressed neoantigens than untreated primary samples, a figure that combines the effects of chemotherapy and other mutagenic processes operative during relapse. Neoadjuvant-treated primary samples showed no detectable increase over untreated samples. The contribution from chemotherapy-associated signatures was small, accounting for a mean of 5% (range 0-16) of the expressed neoantigen burden in relapse samples. In both treated and untreated samples, most neoantigens were attributed to COSMIC Signature (3), associated with BRCA disruption, Signature (1), associated with a slow mutagenic process active in healthy tissue, and Signature (8), of unknown etiology.\n\nConclusionRelapsed HGSC tumors harbor nearly double the predicted expressed neoantigen burden of primary samples, but mutations associated with chemotherapy signatures account for only a small part of this increase. The mutagenic processes responsible for most neoantigens are similar between primary and relapse samples. Our analyses are based on mutations detectable from whole genome sequencing of bulk samples and do not account for neoantigens present in small populations of cells.

cancer biology↗