Burkhard, F. C. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2024

Machine Learning-based Classification of transcriptome Signatures of non-ulcerative Bladder Pain Syndrome

Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) presents a global health challenge with symptoms impacting a substantial percentage of the population. The absence of reliable biomarkers complicates the accurate classification of LUTD subtypes with shared symptoms such as non- ulcerative Bladder Pain Syndrome (BPS) and overactive bladder caused by bladder outlet obstruction with Detrusor Overactivity (DO). This study introduces a machine learning (ML)- based approach for the identification of mRNA signatures specific to non-ulcerative BPS. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) transcriptome data from bladder biopsies of patients with BPS, benign prostatic obstruction with DO and controls, our statistical approach successfully identified 13 candidate genes capable of discerning BPS from control and DO patients. This set was subsequently validated using Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (QPCR) in a larger patient cohort. To confirm our findings, we applied both supervised and unsupervised ML approaches to the QPCR dataset. Notably, a three-mRNA signature TPPP3, FAT1, and NCALD, emerged as a robust classifier, effectively distinguishing patients with non- ulcerative BPS from controls and patients with DO. This signature was universally selected by both supervised and unsupervised approaches. The ML-based framework used to define BPS classifiers not only establishes a solid foundation for comprehending the specific gene expression changes in the bladder of the patients with BPS but also serves as a valuable resource and methodology for advancing signature identification in other fields. The proposed ML pipeline demonstrates its efficacy in handling challenges associated with limited sample sizes, offering a promising avenue for applications in similar domains.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

MLcps: Machine Learning Cumulative Performance Score for classification problems

MotivationA performance metric is a tool to measure the correctness of a trained Machine Learning (ML) model. Numerous performance metrics have been developed for classification problems making it overwhelming to select the appropriate one since each of them represents a particular aspect of the model. Furthermore, selection of a performance metric becomes harder for problems with imbalanced and/or small datasets. Therefore, in clinical studies where datasets are frequently imbalanced and, in situations when the prevalence of a disease is low or the collection of patient samples is difficult, deciding on a suitable metric for performance evaluation of an ML model becomes quite challenging. The most common approach to address this problem is measuring multiple metrics and compare them to identify the best-performing ML model. However, comparison of multiple metrics is laborious and prone to user preference bias. Furthermore, evaluation metrics are also required by ML model optimization techniques such as hyperparameter tuning, where we train many models, each with different parameters, and compare their performances to identify the best-performing parameters. In such situations, it becomes almost impossible to assess different models by comparing multiple metrics. ResultsHere, we propose a new metric called Machine Learning Cumulative Performance Score (MLcps) as a Python package for classification problems. MLcps combines multiple pre-computed performance metrics into one metric that conserves the essence of all pre-computed metrics for a particular model. We tested MLcps on 4 different publicly available biological datasets and the results reveal that it provides a comprehensive picture of overall model robustness. AvailabilityMLcps is available at https://pypi.org/project/MLcps/ and cases of use are available at https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/FunctionalUrology/MLcps.git/main. Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

bioinformatics↗