Biology subjects

Buisson, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Buisson, R..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

HDAC5-encoded Microprotein NISM Mediates Nucleolar Formation and Ribosomal RNA Synthesis

Ribosome biogenesis is the process by which ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal proteins are synthesized, processed, and assembled into functional ribosomes. This process begins in the nucleolus, a multiphase liquid condensate. Here, we discover an arginine-rich disordered nucleolar microprotein encoded within the HDAC5 5'-UTR that we termed Nucleolar Integrity and Stress Microprotein (NISM). NISM overexpression leads to impaired rDNA transcription, triggering nucleolar stress, p53 activation, and suppressed proliferation. NISM knockout causes disruption of nucleolar structure and also induces p53 activation. Mechanistically, NISM interacts with the DExH-box RNA helicase DHX9 and regulates its activities related to pre-rRNA synthesis. Computational analyses and polymer physics-based mathematical modeling revealed that NISM coordinates nucleolar formation and pre-rRNA synthesis by enhancing the liquid-liquid phase separation of DHX9. This study establishes NISM as a regulator of nucleolar biology and deepens our understanding of how disordered microproteins can facilitate the formation of membraneless organelles.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Cooperative Role of PACT and ADAR1 in Preventing Aberrant PKR Activation by Self-Derived Double-Stranded RNA

Double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) produced during viral infections are recognized by the innate immune sensor protein kinase R (PKR), triggering a host translation shutoff that inhibits viral replication and propagation. Given the harmful effects of uncontrolled PKR activation, cells must tightly regulate PKR to ensure that its activation occurs only in response to viral infections, not endogenous dsRNAs. Here, we use CRISPR-Translate, a FACS-based genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening method that exploits translation levels as a readout and identifies PACT as a key inhibitor of PKR during viral infection. We find that cells deficient for PACT hyperactivate PKR in response to several different RNA viruses, raising the question of why cells need to limit PKR activity. Our results demonstrate that PACT cooperates with ADAR1 to suppress PKR activation from self-dsRNAs in uninfected cells. The simultaneous deletion of PACT and ADAR1 results in synthetic lethality, which can be fully rescued in PKR-deficient cells. We propose that both PACT and ADAR1 act as essential barriers against PKR, creating a threshold of tolerable levels to endogenous dsRNA in cells without activating PKR-mediated translation shutdown and cell death.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2024

ATR safeguards replication forks against APOBEC3B-induced toxic PARP1 trapping

ATR is the master safeguard of genomic integrity during DNA replication. Acute inhibition of ATR with ATR inhibitor (ATRi) triggers a surge in origin firing, leading to increased levels of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that rapidly deplete all available RPA. This leaves ssDNA unprotected and susceptible to breakage, a phenomenon known as replication catastrophe. However, the mechanism by which unprotected ssDNA breaks remains unclear. Here, we reveal that APOBEC3B is the key enzyme targeting unprotected ssDNA at replication forks, triggering a reaction cascade that induces fork collapse and PARP1 hyperactivation. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that uracils generated by APOBEC3B at replication forks are removed by UNG2, creating abasic sites that are subsequently cleaved by APE1 endonuclease. Moreover, we demonstrate that APE1-mediated DNA cleavage is the critical enzymatic step for PARP1 trapping and hyperactivation in cells, regardless of how abasic sites are generated on DNA. Finally, we show that APOBEC3B-induced toxic PARP1 trapping in response to ATRi drives cell sensitivity to ATR inhibition, creating to a context of synthetic lethality when combined with PARP inhibitors. Together, these findings reveal the mechanisms that cause replication forks to break during replication catastrophe and explain why ATRi-treated cells are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2024

circPCMTD1: A protein-coding circular RNA that regulates DNA damage response in BCR/ABL-positive leukemias

Circular RNAs are a novel class of RNA transcripts, which regulate important cellular functions in health and disease. Herein, we report on the functional relevance of the circPCMTD1 transcript in acute leukemias. In screening experiments, we found that circPCMTD1 depletion strongly inhibited the proliferative capacity of leukemic cells with BCR-ABL translocations. Mass cytometry experiments identified the aberrant activation of the DNA damage response as an early downstream event of circPCMTD1 depletion. In in vivo experiments, circPCMTD1 targeting prolonged the survival of mice engrafted with leukemic blasts harboring the Philadelphia chromosome. Mechanistically, we found that circPCMTD1 was enriched in the cytoplasm and associated with the ribosomes of the leukemic cells. We detected a cryptic open reading frame within the circPCMTD1 sequence and found that circPCMTD1 could generate a peptide product. The circPCMTD1-derived peptide interacted with proteins of the BTR complex and enhanced BTR complex formation, thereby increasing tolerance to genotoxic stress.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Mesoscale DNA Features Impact APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Deaminase Activity and Shape Tumor Mutational Landscapes

Antiviral DNA cytosine deaminases APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B are major sources of mutations in cancer by catalyzing cytosine-to-uracil deamination. APOBEC3A preferentially targets singlestranded DNAs, with a noted affinity for DNA regions that adopt stem-loop secondary structures. However, the detailed substrate preferences of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B have been fully established, and the specific influence of the DNA sequence on APOBEC3A APOBEC3B deaminase activity remains to be investigated. Here, we find that APOBEC3B selectively targets DNA stem-loop structures, and they are distinct from those subjected deamination by APOBEC3A. We develop Oligo-seq, a novel in vitro sequencing-based to identify specific sequence contexts promoting APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B activity. Through this approach, we demonstrate that APOBEC3A an APOBEC3B deaminase activity is strongly regulated by specific sequences surrounding the targeted cytosine. Moreover, we identify structural features of APOBEC3B and APOBEC3A responsible for their substrate preferences. Importantly, we determine that APOBEC3B-induced mutations in hairpin-forming sequences within tumor genomes differ from the DNA stem-loop sequences mutated by APOBEC3A. Together, our study provides evidence that APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B can generate mutation landscapes in cancer genomes, driven by their unique substrate selectivity.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

APOBEC3A drives acquired resistance to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer

Acquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti-cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified1-6, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. The extent to which therapy actively drives tumor evolution by promoting mutagenic processes7 or simply provides the selective pressure necessary for the outgrowth of drug-resistant clones8 remains an open question. Here, we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug-tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Induction of A3A facilitated the formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in cycling drug-treated cells, and fully resistant clones that evolved from drug-tolerant intermediates exhibited an elevated burden of chromosomal aberrations such as copy number alterations and structural variations. Preventing therapy-induced A3A mutagenesis either by gene deletion or RNAi-mediated suppression delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we observed accumulation of A3A mutations in lung cancer patients who developed drug resistance after treatment with sequential targeted therapies. These data suggest that induction of A3A mutagenesis in response to targeted therapy treatment may facilitate the development of acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

cancer biology↗