bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bui, T. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Bui, T. V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A simple self-decoding model for neural coding

Neural coding is an important tool to discover the inner workings of mind. In this work, we propose and consider a simple but novel self-decoding model for neural coding based on the principle that the neuron body represents ongoing stimulus while dendrites are used to store that stimulus as a memory. In particular, suppose t spiking presynaptic neurons transmit any stimulus directly to a population of n postsynaptic neurons, a postsynaptic neuron spikes if it does not connect to an inhibitory presynaptic neuron, and every stimulus is represented by up to d spiking postsynaptic neurons. Our hypothesis is that the brain is organized to functionally satisfy the following six criteria: (i) decoding objective, i.e., there are up to r-1 [≥] 0 additional spiking postsynaptic neurons in response to a stimulus along with the spiking postsynaptic neurons representing the stimulus, (ii) smoothness, i.e., similar stimuli are encoded similarly by the presynaptic neurons, (iii) optimal information transmission, i.e., t is minimized, (iv) optimal energetic cost, i.e., only the t presynaptic neurons and the postsynaptic neurons representing a stimulus spike, (v) low-dimensional representation, i.e., d = o(n), and (vi) sparse coding, i.e., t = o(n). Our finding is that some criteria cause or correlate with others. Let the characteristic set of a postsynaptic neuron be the set of the presynaptic neurons it connects with. We prove that (i) holds if and only if the union of the r characteristic sets of any r postsynaptic neurons is not included in the union of the d characteristic sets of d other postsynaptic neurons. Consequently, (ii) is attained. More importantly, we suggest that the decoding objective (i) and optimal information transmission (iii) play a fundamental role in neural computation, while (v) and (vi) correlate to each other and correlate with (iii) and (iv). We examine our hypothesis by statistically testing functional connectivity network and the presynaptic-postsynaptic connectivity in layer 2 of the medial entorhinal cortex of a rat.

neuroscience↗

Modelling spinal locomotor circuits for movements in developing zebrafish

Many spinal circuits dedicated to locomotor control have been identified in the developing zebrafish. How these circuits operate together to generate the various swimming movements during development remains to be clarified. In this study, we iteratively built models of developing zebrafish spinal circuits coupled to simplified musculoskeletal models that reproduce coiling and swimming movements. The neurons of the models were based upon morphologically or genetically identified populations in the developing zebrafish spinal cord. We simulated intact spinal circuits as well as circuits with silenced neurons or altered synaptic transmission to better understand the role of specific spinal neurons. Analysis of firing patterns and phase relationships helped identify possible mechanisms underlying the locomotor movements of developing zebrafish. Notably, our simulations demonstrated how the site and the operation of rhythm generation could transition between coiling and swimming. The simulations also underlined the importance of contralateral excitation to multiple tail beats. They allowed us to estimate the sensitivity of spinal locomotor networks to motor command amplitude, synaptic weights, length of ascending and descending axons, and firing behaviour. These models will serve as valuable tools to test and further understand the operation of spinal circuits for locomotion.

neuroscience↗

Spinal V1 neurons inhibit motor targets locally and sensory targets distally to coordinate locomotion

Rostro-caudal coordination of spinal motor output is essential for locomotion. Most spinal interneurons project axons longitudinally to govern locomotor output, yet their connectivity along this axis remains unclear. In this study, we use larval zebrafish to map synaptic outputs of a major inhibitory population, V1 (Eng1+) neurons, which are implicated in dual sensory and motor functions. We find that V1 neurons exhibit long axons extending rostrally and exclusively ipsilaterally for an average of 6 spinal segments; however, they do not connect uniformly with their post-synaptic targets along the entire length of their axon. Locally, V1 neurons inhibit motor neurons (both fast and slow) and other premotor targets including V2a, V2b and commissural pre-motor neurons. In contrast, V1 neurons make robust inhibitory contacts throughout the rostral extent of their axonal projections onto a dorsal horn sensory population, the Commissural Primary Ascending neurons (CoPAs). In a computational model of the ipsilateral spinal network, we show that this pattern of short range V1 inhibition to motor and premotor neurons is crucial for coordinated rostro-caudal propagation of the locomotor wave. We conclude that spinal network architecture in the longitudinal axis can vary dramatically, with differentially targeted local and distal connections, yielding important consequences for function.

neuroscience↗