bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bugler, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Bugler, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Advancing GABA-edited MRS Research through a Reconstruction Challenge

PurposeTo create a benchmark for the comparison of machine learning-based Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) reconstruction models using one quarter of the transients typically acquired during a complete scan. MethodsThe Edited-MRS reconstruction challenge had three tracks with the purpose of evaluating machine learning models trained to reconstruct simulated (Track 1), homogeneous in vivo (Track 2), and heterogeneous in vivo (Track 3) GABA-edited MRS data. Four quantitative metrics were used to evaluate the results: mean squared error (MSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linewidth, and a shape score metric that we proposed. Challenge participants were given three months to create, train and submit their models. Challenge organizers provided open access to a baseline U-NET model for initial comparison, as well as simulated data, in vivo data, and tutorials and guides for adding synthetic noise to the simulations. ResultsThe most successful approach for Track 1 simulated data was a covariance matrix convolutional neural network model, while for Track 2 and Track 3 in vivo data, a vision transformer model operating on a spectrogram representation of the data achieved the most success. Deep learning (DL) based reconstructions with reduced transients achieved equivalent or better SNR, linewidth and fit error as conventional reconstructions with the full amount of transients. However, some DL models also showed the ability to optimize the linewidth and SNR values without actually improving overall spectral quality, pointing to the need for more robust metrics. ConclusionThe edited-MRS reconstruction challenge showed that the top performing DL based edited-MRS reconstruction pipelines can obtain with a reduced number of transients equivalent metrics to conventional reconstruction pipelines using the full amount of transients. The proposed metric shape score was positively correlated with challenge track outcome indicating that it is well-suited to evaluate spectral quality.

bioengineering↗

Frequency and Phase Correction of GABA-Edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks

PurposeTo determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data. MethodsAn ablation study was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using GABAs signal-to-noise ratio and linewidth, Choline artifact, and by analyzing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance and effect size were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Cohens d respectively. ResultsThe ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with real (conventional) convolutions was most effective for FPC. For the comparative study, the simulated data test set showed that our CNN model that received complex-valued inputs with real convolutions outperformed models it was compared against with a lower mean absolute error (p<0.05). For the in vivo data test set, our model performed similarly to other DL FPC models. ConclusionOur results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and real-valued convolutions. This model outperformed existing DL models on simulated data and performed similarly on in vivo data.

neuroscience↗