bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Broschard, M. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Broschard, M. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Interactions between the medial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial striatum, and dorsal hippocampus that support rat category learning

Categorization creates memory representations that are efficient, generalizable, and robust to noise. Multiple brain regions have been implicated in categorization, including the prefrontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus; however, few studies have examined how these regions interact during category learning. We recorded neural activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsomedial striatum (DMS), and dorsal hippocampus (HPC) while rats learned to categorize distributions of visual stimuli. We found a learning-related shift in contributions from the PFC (with DMS[->]PFC theta (4-10Hz) interactions) to the HPC (with HPC[->]DMS and bidirectional PFC-HPC theta interactions). Decision-making depended on DMS and HPC spiking, as well as the PFC[->]HPC[->]DMS pathway. Our results provide a framework that characterizes how the PFC-DMS-HPC network interacts during category learning. This is informative for multiple neurological disorders that affect category learning, including Parkinsons Disease, autism, and dementia. Highlights- Rats learned to categorize distributions of visual stimuli. - Early training sessions relied on PFC spiking and DMS[->]PFC theta interactions. - After learning, contributions shifted to HPC spiking, HPC[->]DMS interactions, and bidirectional PFC-HPC interactions. - Decision-making depended on DMS and HPC spiking and PFC[->]HPC[->]DMS interactions. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=180 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/649785v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ba3342org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7b62a4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@890676org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@75f84_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗

Evidence for an active handoff between cerebral hemispheres during target tracking

The brain has somewhat separate cognitive resources for the left and right sides of our visual field. Despite this lateralization, we have a smooth and unified perception of our environment. This raises the question of how the cerebral hemispheres are coordinated to transfer information between them. We recorded neural activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex, bilaterally, as non-human primates covertly tracked a target that moved from one visual hemifield (i.e., from one hemisphere) to the other. Beta (15 to 30 Hz) power, gamma (30 to 80 Hz) power, and spiking information reflected sensory processing of the target. By contrast, alpha (10 to15 Hz) power, theta (4 to10 Hz) power, and spiking information seemed to reflect an active handoff of attention as target information was transferred between hemispheres. Specifically, alpha power and spiking information ramped up in anticipation of the hemifield cross. Theta power peaked after the cross, signaling its completion. Our results support an active hand-off of information between hemispheres. This handshaking operation may be critical for minimizing information loss, much like how mobile towers handshake when transferring calls between them.

neuroscience↗