bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bronk, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Bronk, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A novel epigenetic clock for rhesus macaques unveils an association between early life adversity and epigenetic age acceleration

Because DNA methylation changes reliably with age, machine learning models called epigenetic clocks can estimate an individuals age based on their DNA methylation profile. This epigenetic measure of age can deviate from ones true age, and the difference between the epigenetic age and true age, known as epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), has been found to directly correlate with morbidity and mortality in adults. Emerging evidence suggests that EAA is also associated with aberrant health outcomes in children, making epigenetic clocks useful tools for studying aging and development. We developed two highly accurate epigenetic clocks for the rhesus macaque, utilizing 1,008 blood samples from 690 macaques between 2 days and 23.4 years of age with diverse genetic backgrounds and exposure to environmental conditions. The first clock, which is trained on all samples, achieves a Pearson correlation between true age and predicted age of 0.983 and median absolute error of 0.210 years. To study phenotypes during development, the second clock is optimized for macaques younger than 6 years and achieves a Pearson correlation of 0.974 and a median absolute error of 0.148 years. Using the latter clock, we investigated whether epigenetic aging is affected by early life adversity in the form of infant maltreatment. Our data suggests that maltreatment and increased hair cortisol levels are associated with epigenetic age acceleration right after the period of maltreatment.

neuroscience↗

Repair of Mismatched Templates during Rad51-dependent Break-Induced Replication

Using budding yeast, we have studied Rad51-dependent break-induced replication (BIR), where the invading 3 end of a site-specific double-strand break (DSB) and a donor template share 108 bp of homology that can be easily altered. When every 10th base is mismatched between donor and recipient, BIR is 44% efficient compared to fully homologous sequences; but BIR still occurs about 10% when every 6th base is mismatched. Here we explore the tolerance of mismatches in more detail, by examining donor templates that each carry 10 mismatches, but where they are clustered with spacings of every 6th bp. These different arrangements of uneven mismatch distribution were in general less efficient in recombination as templates with evenly distributed mismatches. A donor with all 10 mismatches clustered every 6th base at the 3 invading end of the DSB was not impaired compared to the case where mismatches were clustered at the 5 end. These data suggest that the efficiency of strand invasion is principally dictated by thermodynamic considerations, i.e., by the total number of base pairs that can be formed; but sequence-specific factors are also important. Mismatches in the donor template are incorporated into the BIR product in a strongly polar fashion up to ~40 nucleotides from the 3 end. Mismatch incorporation depends on the 3 [->] 5 proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase {delta}, with little contribution from Msh2/Mlh1 mismatch repair proteins. Surprisingly, the probability of a mismatch 27 nt from the 3 end being replaced by donor sequence was the same whether the preceding 26 nucleotides were mismatched every 6th base or fully homologous. These data suggest that DNA polymerase {delta} "chews back" the 3 end of the invading strand without any mismatch-dependent cues from the strand invasion structure. Author SummaryDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal forms of DNA damage and inaccurate repair of these breaks presents a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. Break-induced replication (BIR) is a homologous recombination pathway that results in a nonreciprocal translocation of chromosome ends. We used budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to investigate Rad51-mediated BIR, where the invading 3 end of the DSB and a donor template share 108 bp of homology. We examined the tolerance of differently distributed mismatches on a homologous donor template and found that BIR efficiency was the same whether the mismatches were clustered at the 3 invading end or at the 5 end. We confirmed that mismatches are incorporated into the BIR product in a strongly polar fashion as far as about 40 nucleotides from the 3 end. We conclude that the proofreading activity of DNA polymerase {delta} "chews back" the 3 end of the invading strand even when the sequences removed have no mismatches for the first 26 nucleotides. These observations enrich our understanding of the details of Rad51-mediated strand invasion and provide insight into the mechanism of the 3 to 5 proofreading activity of DNA polymerase during homologous recombination.

molecular biology↗

Yeast ATM and ATR use different mechanisms to spread histone H2A phosphorylation around a DNA double-strand break

One of the hallmarks of DNA damage is the rapid spreading of phosphorylated histone H2A ({gamma}-H2AX) around a DNA double-strand break (DSB). In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, nearly all H2A isoforms can be phosphorylated, either by Mec1ATR or Tel1ATM checkpoint kinases. We induced a site-specific DSB with HO endonuclease at the MAT locus on chromosome III and monitored the formation of {gamma}-H2AX by ChIP-qPCR in order to uncover the mechanisms by which Mec1ATR and Tel1ATM propagate histone modifications across chromatin. With either kinase, {gamma}-H2AX spreads as far as [~]50 kb on both sides of the lesion within 1 h; but the kinetics and distribution of modification around the DSB are significantly different. The total accumulation of phosphorylation is reduced by about half when either of the two H2A genes is mutated to the nonphosphorylatable S129A allele. Mec1 activity is limited by the abundance of its ATRIP partner, Ddc2. Moreover, Mec1 is more efficient than Tel1 at phosphorylating chromatin in trans - at distant undamaged sites that are brought into physical proximity to the DSB. We compared experimental data to mathematical models of spreading mechanisms to determine whether the kinases search for target nucleosomes by primarily moving in three dimensions through the nucleoplasm or in one dimension along the chromatin. Bayesian model selection indicates that Mec1 primarily uses a 3D diffusive mechanism, whereas Tel1 undergoes directed motion along the chromatin.

molecular biology↗