bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brinkhoff, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Brinkhoff, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Ecogenomics and functional biogeography of the Roseobacter group in the global oceans based on 653 MAGs and SAGs

BackgroundThe Roseobacter group is a major component of prokaryotic communities in the global oceans. Information on this group is based predominantly on isolates and their genomic features and on the 16S rRNA gene. Assessments of prokaryotic communities in the pelagic of the global oceans indicated an unveiled diversity of this group but studies of the diversity and global biogeography of the entire group are still missing. Hence, we aimed at a comprehensive assessment of the Roseobacter group in the global oceans on the basis of MAGs and SAGs. ResultsThe obtained 610 MAGs and 43 SAGs of high quality were subjected to in-depth analyses of their phylogeny, genomic and functional features. The recruitment locations range from the tropics to polar regions, include all major ocean basins. The phylogenetic analysis delineated the known RCA cluster and five pelagic clusters, two of which were completely novel: TCR (Temperate and Cold Roseobacter), AAPR (Arctic-Atlantic-Pacific Roseobacter, novel), AAR (Arctic-Atlantic Roseobacter, novel), COR (Central Oceanic Roseobacter), LUX (Cand. Luxescamonaceae) cluster. These clusters account for [~]70% of all Roseobacter MAGs and SAGs in the epipelagic. The TCR, AAPR, AAR and LUX clusters are among the most deeply branching lineages of the Roseobacter group. These clusters and several sublineages of the RCA and COR clusters exhibit distinct features of genome streamlining, i.e. genome sizes of <2.9 Mbp and G+C contents of <40%. The clusters exhibit differences in their functional features and also compared to other lineages of the Roseobacter group. Proteorhodopsin is encoded in most species of the AAPR, AAR, TCR and RCA clusters and in a few species of the COR cluster, whereas in most species of the latter, the LUX cluster and in a few species of the RCA cluster aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis was encoded. Biogeographic assessments showed that the AAPR, AAR, TCR and RCA clusters constitute the Roseobacter group in the temperate to polar regions to great extent whereas the COR and LUX clusters in the tropics and subtropics. ConclusionsOur comprehensive analyses shed new light on the diversification, genomic features, environmental adaptation, and global biogeography of a major lineage of pelagic bacteria.

microbiology↗

A neutral process of genome reduction in marine bacterioplankton

Marine bacterioplankton communities are dominated by cells equipped with small genomes. Streamlining selection has been accepted as the main force driving their genome reduction. Here, we report that a neutral evolutionary mechanism governs genome reduction in the Roseobacter group that represents 5-20% of the bacterioplankton cells in coastal waters. Using representative strains that fall into three genome size groups (2-3, 3-4, and 4-5 Mbp), we measured their genomic mutation rates () through long-term mutation accumulation experiments followed by genome sequencing the resulting 437 mutant lines. We further calculated their effective population sizes (Ne) based on and the neutral genetic diversity of the studied species, the latter estimated based on multiple genome sequences of natural isolates collected from global oceans with their population structure considered. A surprising finding is that Ne scales positively with genome size, which is the opposite of the expectation from the streamlining selection theory. As the strength of random genetic drift is the inverse of Ne, this result instead suggests drift as the primary driver of genome reduction. Additionally, we report a negative scaling between and genome size, which is the first experimental evidence for the long-lasting hypothesis that mutation rate increases play a part in marine bacterial genome reduction. As scales inversely with Ne, genetic drift appears to be the ultimate cause of genome reduction in these Roseobacters. Our finding discounts, but is insufficient to reject, the streamlining theory because streamlining process is expected to be more effective in oligotrophic open ocean waters.

microbiology↗