bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brewer, D. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Brewer, D. S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Novel Methylation Markers in a Prostate Cancer Cohort are Associated with Disease Development and Relapse

Prostate cancer remains one of the most common cancers among men globally. While significant strides have been made in diagnosis and treatment, understanding the complex genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of the disease remains crucial for guiding intervention and developing more personalized and effective therapies. The importance of DNA methylation in prostate cancer has been known for some time, but important facets of the modulation of the epigenome during carcinogenesis remain obscure, partly because the bulk of cancer methylation data have been produced using microarray technologies. Here we utilise the TruSeq methyl capture method (EPICseq) to profile the, previously defined, UK Prostate ICGC cohort of well-annotated primary prostate cancers. To this we add methylation sequencing of benign tissue from the same men. These data allow us to identify differentially methylated regions distinguishing cancerous and non-cancerous prostate tissue, while identifying numerous genes whose methylation profiles can perform that task as well as distinguishing between classes of prostate cancer. We describe a describe a methylation-based control mechanism for prostate-cancer-associated SNPs, and show that this seems a likely mechanism of action for a SNP near the MMP7 gene. We describe three novel molecular signatures that arise from different aspects of the biology of prostate cancer revealed by sequencing. Each is shown to be an independent classifier of cancers into groups with different expected times to relapse. These consist of patterns in driver gene methylation, strand-specific methylation, and signal arising in mitochondrial reads. We show that these signatures, combined with existing molecular tools, provide a powerful predictor of time to recurrence. By substantially enhancing understanding of prostate cancer risk, detection, and prognosis, we pave the way for the development of clinical practices that will benefit patients and improve outcomes.

cancer biology↗

The extracellular heparan sulfatase SULF2 limits myeloid IFNbeta signaling and Th17 responses in inflammatory arthritis.

Heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans are important regulators of cellular responses to soluble mediators such as chemokines, cytokines and growth factors. We profiled changes in expression of genes encoding HS core proteins, biosynthesis enzymes and modifiers during macrophage polarisation, and found that the most highly regulated gene was Sulf2, an extracellular HS 6-O-sulfatase that was markedly downregulated in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli. We then generated Sulf2+/- bone marrow chimeric mice and examined inflammatory responses in antigen-induced arthritis, as a model of rheumatoid arthritis. Resolution of inflammation was impaired in myeloid Sulf2+/- chimeras, with elevated joint swelling and increased abundance of pro-arthritic Th17 cells in synovial tissue. Transcriptomic and in vitro analyses indicated that Sulf2 deficiency increased type I interferon signaling in bone marrow-derived macrophages, leading to elevated expression of the Th17-inducing cytokine IL-6. This establishes that dynamic remodeling of HS by Sulf2 limits type I interferon signaling in macrophages, and so protects against Th17-driven pathology.

immunology↗

Major data analysis errors invalidate cancer microbiome findings

We re-analyzed the data from a recent large-scale study that reported strong correlations between microbial organisms and 33 different cancer types, and that created machine learning predictors with near-perfect accuracy at distinguishing among cancers. We found at least two fundamental flaws in the reported data and in the methods: (1) errors in the genome database and the associated computational methods led to millions of false positive findings of bacterial reads across all samples, largely because most of the sequences identified as bacteria were instead human; and (2) errors in transformation of the raw data created an artificial signature, even for microbes with no reads detected, tagging each tumor type with a distinct signal that the machine learning programs then used to create an apparently accurate classifier. Each of these problems invalidates the results, leading to the conclusion that the microbiome-based classifiers for identifying cancer presented in the study are entirely wrong. These flaws have subsequently affected more than a dozen additional published studies that used the same data and whose results are likely invalid as well.

cancer biology↗

Caution Regarding the Specificities of Pan-Cancer Microbial Structure

The results published in Poore and Kopylova et al. 2020[1] revealed the possibility of being able to almost perfectly differentiate between types of tumour based on their microbial composition using machine learning models. Whilst we believe that there is the potential for microbial composition to be used in this manner, we have concerns with the manuscript that make us question the certainty of the conclusions drawn. We believe there are issues in the areas of the contribution of contamination, handling of batch effects, false positive classifications and limitations in the machine learning approaches used. This makes it difficult to identify whether the authors have identified true biological signal and how robust these models would be in use as clinical biomarkers. We commend Poore and Kopylova et al. on their approach to open data and reproducibility that has enabled this analysis. We hope that this discourse assists the future development of machine learning models and hypothesis generation in microbiome research.

bioinformatics↗

The landscape of viral associations in human cancers

Potential viral pathogens were systematically investigated in the whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of 2,656 donors as part of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes using a consensus approach integrating three independent pathogen detection pipelines. Viruses were detected in 382 genomic and 68 transcriptome data sets. We extensively searched and characterized numerous features of virus-positive cancers integrating various PCAWG datasets. We show the high prevalence of known tumor associated viruses such as EBV, HBV and several HPV types. Our systematic analysis revealed that HPV presence was significantly exclusive with well-known driver mutations in head/neck cancer. A strong association was observed between HPV infection and the APOBEC mutational signatures, suggesting the role of impaired mechanism of antiviral cellular defense as a driving force in the development of cervical, bladder and head neck carcinoma. Viral integration into the host genome was observed for HBV, HPV16, HPV18 and AAV2 and associated with a local increase in copy number variations. The recurrent viral integrations at the TERT promoter were coupled to high telomerase expression uncovering a further mechanism to activate this tumor driving process. High levels of endogenous retrovirus ERV1 expression is linked to worse survival outcome in kidney cancer.

cancer biology↗