Biology subjects

Brent, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Brent, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Predicting which genes will respond to perturbations of a TF: TF-independent properties of genes are major determinants of their responsiveness

BackgroundThe ability to predict which genes will respond to perturbation of a TFs activity serves as a benchmark for our systems-level understanding of transcriptional regulatory networks. In previous work, machine learning models have been trained to predict static gene expression levels in a given sample by using data from the same or similar conditions, including data on TF binding locations, histone marks, or DNA sequence. We report on a different challenge - training machine learning models that can predict which genes will respond to perturbation of a TF without using any data from the perturbed cells. ResultsExisting TF location data (ChIP-Seq) from human K562 cells have no detectable utility for predicting which genes will respond to perturbation of the TF, but data obtained by newer methods in yeast cells are useful. TF-independent features of genes, including their pre-perturbation expression level and expression variation, are very useful for predicting responses to TF perturbations. This shows that some genes are poised to respond to TF perturbations and others are resistant, shedding significant light on why it has been so difficult to predict responses from binding locations. Certain histone marks (HMs), including H3K4me1 and H3K4me3, have some predictive power, especially when downstream of the transcription start site. In human, the predictive power of HMs is much less than that of gene expression level and variation. Code is available at https://github.com/yiming-kang/TFPertRespExplainer. ConclusionsSequence-based or epigenetic properties of genes strongly influence their tendency to respond to direct TF perturbations, partially explaining the oft-noted difficulty of predicting responsiveness from TF binding location data. These molecular features are largely reflected in and summarized by the genes expression level and expression variation.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Inferring TF activities and activity regulators from gene expression data with constraints from TF perturbation data

BackgroundThe activity of a transcription factor (TF) in a sample of cells is the extent to which it is exerting its regulatory potential. Many methods of inferring TF activity from gene expression data have been described, but due to the lack of appropriate large-scale datasets, systematic and objective validation has not been possible until now. ResultsUsing a new dataset, we systematically evaluate and optimize the approach to TF activity inference in which a gene expression matrix is factored into a condition-independent matrix of control strengths and a condition-dependent matrix of TF activity levels. These approaches require a TF network map, which specifies the target genes of each TF, as input. We evaluate different approaches to building the network map and deriving constraints on the matrices. We find that such constraints are essential for good performance. Constraints can be obtained from expression data in which the activities of individual TFs have been perturbed, and we find that such data are both necessary and sufficient for obtaining good performance. Remaining uncertainty about whether a TF activates or represses a target is a major source of error. To a considerable extent, control strengths inferred using expression data from one growth condition carry over to other conditions. As a result, the control strength matrices derived here can be used for other applications. Finally, we apply these methods to gain insight into the upstream factors that regulate the activities of four yeast TFs: Gcr2, Gln3, Gcn4, and Msn2. Evaluation code and data available at https://github.com/BrentLab/TFA-evaluation ConclusionsWhen a high-quality network map, constraints, and perturbation-response data are available, inferring TF activity levels by factoring gene expression matrices is effective. Furthermore, it provides insight into regulators of TF activity.

systems biology↗