bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Brea, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Brea, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Morphomechanically-Informed Spatial Curvature Sequencing in Prostate Cancer

Morphological changes in prostate glands, assessed by Gleason grading, remain the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer, yet molecular biomarkers associated with gland shape are not well understood. Here, we introduce CurvSeq, a mechanomorphology-informed framework for spatial sequencing data, and CurvSee, its complementary version for proteomic and imaging datasets. These methods integrate gland boundary curvature, pocket architecture, microenvironmental composition, and molecular profiles to study morphomechanical relationships in prostate adenocarcinoma. Using five independent spatial transcriptomic and multiplexed imaging datasets, we segmented individual prostate glands, extracted gland contours, quantified local curvature and pocket-like concavities, and projected these features onto spatially resolved gene and protein measurements. In Xenium data, CurvSeq distinguished benign and GG1 glands, identifying cancer-associated genes such as PCA3 and AMACR in GG1 glands and basal, basement membrane, and mechanotransduction-associated programs in benign glands. In Visium data, a diffusion-based morphomechanical score ordered benign glands by area, circularity, pocket number, smooth muscle abundance, immune-cell proximity, and remodeling-associated genes including MMP7. In GG4 glands, CurvSeq identified neuroendocrine-like boundary regions associated with MMP7 expression, COL1A1-rich adjacent stroma, and immune-cell accumulation. Finally, CurvSee extended this framework to multiplexed protein imaging, where combined morphology and protein-expression features distinguished Gleason-associated gland states. Together, CurvSeq and CurvSee provide a quantitative framework for linking gland architecture, local microenvironment, and molecular state, showing that prostate gland morphology can be integrated with spatial omics to identify morphomechanical niches associated with cancer progression.

systems biology↗

Physiological predictors of competitive performance in CrossFit(R) athletes

The aim of this study was to determine which physiological variables could predict performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male CrossFit athletes (35 {+/-} 9 years) participated and performed a series of tests (incremental load test for full squat and bench press, jump tests, incremental running test, and Wingate test) that were used as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and the relationship between each variable and CrossFit performance was analyzed. Overall Crossfit performance (i.e., final ranking considering all WODs) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake and maximum speed during an incremental running test (all p<0.05, r=0.58-0.75), although the relationship of most markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the combination of maximum oxygen uptake, squat jump ability, and reactive strength index accounted for 81% of the variance in overall CrossFit performance (p=0.0003). CrossFit performance seems dependent on a variety of power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers, which reflects the complexity of this sport. Improvements in aerobic capacity may help people and athletes in CrossFit performance and well-being. Also, focus on lower body power could be the key to obtain better performance markers.

physiology↗