bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bratsch-Prince, J. X.

Publications and source records attributed to Bratsch-Prince, J. X..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

vCA1 SST neurons represent avoidance states that guide anxiety-related behavioral choices

In uncertain, threatening environments, rapid and flexible behavioral decisions are essential for survival. The ventral CA1 region of the hippocampus encodes threatening contexts and can regulate avoidance-related behaviors. While activity patterns in excitatory neurons of vCA1 have been well characterized, the contributions of specific interneuron subtypes to avoidance decisions in threatening situations remain to be fully elucidated. Here, we show that somatostatin expressing (SST) interneurons in vCA1 are selectively recruited during avoidance behavior and play a causal role in shaping behavioral responses in aversive spaces. We find that vCA1 SST interneurons ramp their activity in anticipation of, and during, avoidance. This contrasted with parvalbumin (PV) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) interneurons, which are preferentially active during exploratory approach behaviors. Unlike other classes of vCA1 interneurons, SST neuron activity more reliably represented the animals intention to avoid rather than its spatial position. Moreover, optogenetic silencing of SST interneurons reduced the efficiency of approach-avoidance decisions. These findings identify vCA1 SST interneurons as key regulators of threat assessment, revealing a cell-type-specific mechanism by which vCA1 microcircuits govern avoidance behaviors. This work provides a new framework for understanding hippocampal control of avoidance behavior and highlights SST-expressing interneurons as key contributors to anxiety-related behaviors.

neuroscience↗

Synaptic acetylcholine induces sharp wave ripples in the basolateral amygdala through nicotinic receptors

While the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is critical in the consolidation of emotional memories, mechanisms underlying memory consolidation in this region are not well understood. In the hippocampus, memory consolidation depends upon network signatures termed sharp wave ripples (SWR). These SWRs largely occur during states of awake rest or slow wave sleep and are inversely correlated with cholinergic tone. While high frequency cholinergic stimulation can inhibit SWRs through muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, it is unclear how nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or different cholinergic firing patterns may influence SWR generation. SWRs are also present in BLA in vivo. Interestingly, the BLA receives extremely dense cholinergic inputs, yet the relationship between acetylcholine (ACh) and BLA SWRs is unexplored. Here, using brain slice electrophysiology in male and female mice, we show that brief stimulation of ACh inputs to BLA reliably induces SWRs that resemble those that occur in the BLA in vivo. Repeated ACh-SWRs are induced with single pulse stimulation at low, but not higher frequencies. ACh-SWRs are driven by nicotinic receptors which recruit different classes of local interneurons and trigger glutamate release from external inputs. In total, our findings establish a previously undefined mechanism for SWR induction in the brain. They also challenge the previous notion of neuromodulators as purely modulatory agents gating these events but instead reveal these systems can directly instruct SWR induction with temporal precision. Further, these results intriguingly suggest a new role for the nicotinic system in emotional memory consolidation. Significance StatementSharp wave ripples represent a key network signature believed to be important in memory consolidation. These network events have been largely studied in the hippocampus and are suppressed by the basal forebrain cholinergic system. Sharp wave ripples also occur in the basolateral amygdala, a region critically involved in emotional memory consolidation. Here, we show a novel mechanism by which low frequency stimulation of synaptic acetylcholine in basolateral amygdala brain slices can reliably induce sharp wave ripples through a nicotinic receptor-mediated mechanism. These findings update the view of neuromodulatory systems in sharp wave ripple induction, moving past a purely modulatory role for these systems and instead establish a role where modulators, like acetylcholine, can directly drive SWRs with temporal precision.

neuroscience↗

Representations of stimulus meaning in the hippocampus

The ability to discriminate and categorize the meaning of environmental stimuli and respond accordingly is essential for survival. The ventral hippocampus (vHPC) controls emotional and motivated behaviors in response to environmental cues and is hypothesized to do so in part by deciphering the positive or negative quality of these cues. Yet, what features of the environment are represented in the activity patterns of vCA1 neurons, and whether the positive or negative meaning of a stimulus is present at this stage, remains unclear. Here, using 2-photon calcium imaging across six different experimental paradigms, we consistently found that vCA1 ensembles encode the identity, sensory features, and intensity of learned and innately salient stimuli, but not their overall valence. These results offer a reappraisal of vCA1 function, wherein information corresponding to individual stimulus features and their behavioral saliency predominates, while valence-related information is attached elsewhere.

neuroscience↗

Acetylcholine engages distinct amygdala microcircuits to gate internal theta rhythm

Acetylcholine (ACh) is released from basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in response to salient stimuli and engages brain states supporting attention and memory. These high ACh states are associated with theta oscillations, which synchronize neuronal ensembles. Theta oscillations in basolateral amygdala (BLA) underlie emotional memory, yet their mechanism remains unclear. Using brain slice electrophysiology in mice, we show large ACh stimuli evoke prolonged theta oscillations in BLA local field potential that depend upon activation of cholecystokinin (CCK) interneurons (INs). Somatostatin (SOM) INs inhibit CCK INs and are themselves inhibited by ACh, gating BLA theta. ACh-induced theta activity is more readily evoked in BLA over cortex or hippocampus, suggesting preferential activation of BLA during high ACh states. These data reveal a SOM-CCK IN circuit in BLA that gates internal theta oscillations and suggest a mechanism by which salient stimuli acting through ACh switch the BLA into a network state enabling emotional memory.

neuroscience↗

Differential regulation of prelimbic and thalamic transmission to the basolateral amygdala by acetylcholine receptors

The amygdalar anterior basolateral nucleus (BLa) plays a vital role in emotional behaviors. This region receives dense cholinergic projections from basal forebrain which are critical in regulating neuronal activity and synaptic transmission. Cholinergic signaling in BLa is thought to occur through both a slow mode of volume transmission as well as a rapid, phasic mode. However, the relative effect of each mode of signaling in BLa is not understood. Here, we used electrophysiology and optogenetics in mouse brain slices to compare regulation of afferent input from cortex and thalamus to the BLa by these two modes of transmission. Phasic ACh release evoked by single pulse stimulation of cholinergic terminals had a biphasic effect on glutamatergic transmission at cortical input, producing rapid nicotinic receptor-mediated facilitation followed by slower muscarinic receptor (mAChR)-mediated depression. In contrast, tonic elevation of ACh through application of the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine suppressed glutamatergic transmission at cortical inputs through mAChRs only. This suppression was not observed at thalamic inputs to BLa. In agreement with this pathway-specificity, the mAChR agonist, muscarine more potently suppressed transmission at inputs from prelimbic cortex (PL) than thalamus. Muscarinic inhibition at PL input was dependent on presynaptic M4 mAChRs, while at thalamic input it depended upon M3 mAChR-mediated stimulation of retrograde endocannabinoid signaling. Muscarinic inhibition at both pathways was frequency-dependent, allowing only high frequency activity to pass. These findings demonstrate complex cholinergic regulation of afferent input to BLa that depends upon the mode of ACh release and is both pathway specific and frequency dependent. Significance statementCholinergic modulation of the basolateral amygdala regulates formation of emotional memories, but the mechanisms underlying this regulation are not well understood. Here, we show, using mouse brain slices, that ACh differentially regulates afferent transmission to the BLa depending on the mode of cholinergic signaling. Rapid, phasic ACh produces a biphasic excitatory-inhibitory regulation of glutamatergic transmission mediated by nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, respectively. In contrast, slow, tonic ACh produces muscarinic inhibition only. Tonic regulation is pathway specific with cortical input regulated more strongly than thalamic input. This disparity is caused by differential regulation by M4 and M3 receptors at the two inputs. Specific targeting of these receptors may thus provide a therapeutic strategy to bias amygdalar processing and regulate emotional memory.

neuroscience↗