Brambati, A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

RNA Transcripts Serve as a Template for Double-Strand Break Repair in Human Cells

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic lesions that lead to genome instability. While canonical DSB repair pathways typically operate independently of RNA, emerging evidence suggests that RNA:DNA hybrids and transcripts near damaged sites can influence repair outcomes. However, a direct role for transcript RNA as a template during DSB repair in human cells is yet to be established. In this study, we designed fluorescent- and sequencing-based assays, which demonstrated that RNA-containing oligonucleotides and messenger RNA serve as templates to promote DSB repair. We conducted a CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic screen to identify factors that promote RNA-templated DSB repair (RT-DSBR), and of the candidate polymerases, we identified DNA polymerase-zeta (Pol{zeta}) as the potential reverse transcriptase that facilitates RT-DSBR. Furthermore, by analyzing sequencing data from cancer genomes, we identified the presence of whole intron deletions, a unique genomic scar reflective of RT-DSBR activity generated when spliced mRNA serves as the repair template. These findings highlight RT-DSBR as an alternative pathway for repairing DSBs in transcribed genes, with potential mutagenic consequences.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

RHINO restricts MMEJ activity to mitosis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic lesions that can lead to genome instability if not properly repaired. Breaks incurred in G1 phase of the cell cycle are predominantly fixed by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), while homologous recombination (HR) is the primary repair pathway in S and G2. Microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) is intrinsically error-prone and considered a backup DSB repair pathway that becomes essential when HR and NHEJ are compromised. In this study, we uncover MMEJ as the major DSB repair pathway in M phase. Using CRISPR/Cas9-based synthetic lethal screens, we identify subunits of the 9-1-1 complex (RAD9A-HUS1-RAD1) and its interacting partner, RHINO, as critical MMEJ factors. Mechanistically, we show that the function of 9-1-1 and RHINO in MMEJ is inconsistent with their well-established role in ATR signaling. Instead, RHINO plays an unexpected and essential role in directing mutagenic repair to M phase by directly binding to Polymerase theta (Pol{theta}) and promoting its recruitment to DSBs in mitosis. In addition, we provide evidence that mitotic MMEJ repairs persistent DNA damage that originates in S phase but is not repaired by HR. The latter findings could explain the synthetic lethal relationship between POLQ and BRCA1/2 and the synergistic effect of Pol{theta} and PARP inhibitors. In summary, our study identifies MMEJ as the primary pathway for repairing DSBs during mitosis and highlights an unanticipated role for RHINO in directing mutagenic repair to M phase.

molecular biology↗