Bowden, B. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Genetic Ablation and Multi-Omics Profiling Reveal CEP55 as a Key Driver of Tumorigenesis in Diverse Cancer Models

BackgroundCEP55 is a centrosomal protein with emerging oncogenic roles. It is overexpressed in many cancers, where it drives genomic instability, phenocopies PTEN loss and hyperactivates the PI3K/AKT pathway, thereby promoting aggressive and therapy-resistant tumors. MethodsWe developed an inducible Cep55 knockout (KO) mouse model as well as generated primary, immortalized (SV40), and transformed (E1A/Ras) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) for functional and proteomic assays. Tumorigenesis was studied using E1A/Ras MEF transplantation and a Pten-deficient genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM). Multi-omics apparatus including proteomics, and spatial transcriptomics, histopathology, immunobloting and functional assays were employed to elucidate underlying mechanisms. Findings were cross-validated using human cancer datasets. ResultsCep55 ablation remodeled the extracellular matrix (ECM), disrupted integrin and oncogenic signaling, reduced AKT/ERK activation, and induced stress pathways. Cep55 knockouts (KO) cells showed impaired proliferation, migration, invasion, and adhesion. In vivo, unlike the embryonic lethality observed in constitutive KOs, the inducible Cep55 deletion was well-tolerated in adult mice. Strikingly, tumors derived from Cep55-null EIA/RAS-transformed MEFs exhibited delayed onset and progression. In the genetically engineered cancer-prone mouse model, Cep55 deletion on a Pten-deficient background led to a greater than seven-fold increase in median survival. Spatial transcriptomics on cancerous tissues revealed that CEP55 regulates ECM remodeling, integrin expression, trafficking, and cell adhesion, supporting its critical role in tumor progression to metastasis. ConclusionCEP55 is dispensable for adult homeostasis but essential for tumorigenesis, especially with PTEN loss. Its deletion suppresses transformation, delays tumor growth, and prolongs survival, supporting CEP55 as a therapeutic target in PTEN-deficient cancers. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=93 SRC="FIGDIR/small/685219v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3d81e8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bd5a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@167ecf3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f57b95_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Measuring effects of trainee professional development on research productivity: A cross-institutional meta-analysis

PhD-trained scientists are essential contributors to the workforce in diverse employment sectors that include academia, industry, government, and non-profit organizations. Hence, best practices for training the future biomedical workforce are of national concern. Complementing coursework and laboratory research training, many institutions now offer professional training that enables career exploration and develops a broad set of skills critical to various career paths. The National Institutes of Health funded academic institutions to design innovative programming to enable this professional development through a mechanism known as Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST). Programming at the BEST awardee institutions included career panels, skill-building workshops, job-searching workshops, site visits, and internships. An initial concern was since doctoral training is lengthy and requires focused attention on dissertation research, having students participate in additional complementary training activities might lengthen time to degree and hamper student research productivity. To address this concern, using time to degree and publication records as measures of efficiency and productivity, metrics were analyzed from ten BEST awardee institutions. Comparing doctoral students who participated to those who did not, results revealed that across these diverse academic institutions, there were no differences in time to degree or manuscript output. Furthermore, a few institutions even demonstrated a positive correlation between participation in career and professional development activities and productivity. Our findings suggest that doctoral students should be encouraged to participate in career and professional development opportunities to ensure their preparedness for a variety of diverse and important careers in the workforce. Significance StatementOur study is unique in that it compiled doctoral degree durations at ten different universities, recorded individual participation in career and professional development activities in terms of dosage, and tracked individual engagement in real-time rather than relying on surveys sent to trainees after graduation. Participation in career and professional development activities, including internships, did not decrease efficiency or productivity. Our findings suggest that doctoral students should be encouraged to participate in career and professional development opportunities to ensure their preparedness for a variety of diverse and important careers in the workforce.

scientific communication and education↗