Biology subjects

Bornholdt, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Bornholdt, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

A versatile information retrieval framework for evaluating profile strength and similarity

In profiling assays, thousands of biological properties are measured across many samples, yielding biological discoveries by capturing the state of a cell population, often at the single-cell level. However, for profiling datasets, it has been challenging to evaluate the phenotypic activity of a sample and the phenotypic consistency among samples, due to profiles high dimensionality, heterogeneous nature, and non-linear properties. Existing methods leave researchers uncertain where to draw boundaries between meaningful biological response and technical noise. Here, we developed a statistical framework that uses the well-established mean average precision (mAP) as a single, data-driven metric to bridge this gap. We validated the mAP framework against established metrics through simulations and real-world data applications, revealing its ability to capture subtle and meaningful biological differences in cell state. Specifically, we used mAP to assess both phenotypic activity for a given perturbation (or a sample) as well as consistency within groups of perturbations (or samples) across diverse high-dimensional datasets. We evaluated the framework on different profile types (image, protein, and mRNA profiles), perturbation types (CRISPR gene editing, gene overexpression, and small molecules), and profile resolutions (single-cell and bulk). Our open-source software allows this framework to be applied to identify interesting biological phenomena and promising therapeutics from large-scale profiling data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2022

Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations

Measuring the phenotypic effect of treatments on cells through imaging assays is an efficient and powerful way of studying cell biology, and requires computational methods for transforming images into quantitative data that highlight phenotypic outcomes. Here, we present an optimized strategy for learning representations of treatment effects from high-throughput imaging data, which follows a causal framework for interpreting results and guiding performance improvements. We use weakly supervised learning (WSL) for modeling associations between images and treatments, and show that it encodes both confounding factors and phenotypic features in the learned representation. To facilitate their separation, we constructed a large training dataset with Cell Painting images from five different studies to maximize experimental diversity, following insights from our causal analysis. Training a WSL model with this dataset successfully improves downstream performance, and produces a reusable convolutional network for image-based profiling, which we call Cell Painting CNN-1. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of our strategy on three publicly available Cell Painting datasets, discovering that representations obtained by the Cell Painting CNN-1 can improve performance in downstream analysis for biological matching up to 30% with respect to classical features, while also being more computationally efficient.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Morphology and gene expression profiling provide complementary information for mapping cell state

Morphological and gene expression profiling can cost-effectively capture thousands of features in thousands of samples across perturbations by disease, mutation, or drug treatments, but it is unclear to what extent the two modalities capture overlapping versus complementary information. Here, using both the L1000 and Cell Painting assays to profile gene expression and cell morphology, respectively, we perturb A549 lung cancer cells with 1,327 small molecules from the Drug Repurposing Hub across six doses, providing a data resource including dose-response data from both assays. The two assays capture both shared and complementary information for mapping cell state. Cell Painting profiles from compound perturbations are more reproducible and show more diversity, but measure fewer distinct groups of features. Applying unsupervised and supervised methods to predict compound mechanisms of action (MOA) and gene targets, we find that the two assays provide a partially shared, but also a complementary view of drug mechanisms. Given the numerous applications of profiling in biology, our analyses provide guidance for planning experiments that profile cells for detecting distinct cell types, disease phenotypes, and response to chemical or genetic perturbations.

bioinformatics↗