bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Boidequin, L. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Boidequin, L. F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Timecourse of corticospinal excitability for observed action: evidence of early suppression followed by return to baseline without facilitation

IntroductionAction observation modulates corticospinal excitability, with most previous studies indicating an increase in excitability in the muscles involved in the observed movement. In addition, previous work suggests that modulation of corticospinal excitability could be specific to the timing of the stimulation, muscle, and direction of movement. Here we examined the influence of these factors on corticospinal excitability. MethodParticipants observed stimuli presenting a static hand, followed by an image of the endpoint of an index/little finger abduction movement. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered at time points from 100-800ms after movement onset. Stimuli were presented in various orientations to study possible effects of anatomical positioning and movement direction, compared relative to the control condition of a static hand. ResultsCorticospinal excitability was lower at early timings (100-400ms), before rising to a plateau at later timings (500-800ms) which did not differ from the static hand condition. This facilitation was muscle-specific, with higher excitability for the muscle involved in the observed movement. By contrast, the relative direction of movement did not influence corticospinal excitability. DiscussionThese results replicate the time-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability induced by action observation; however, we argue that simply interpreting such effects as an increase in excitability may be overly simplistic. In line with previous studies, we argue that the choice of control condition used during action observation studies may be critical to the overall direction of effects.

neuroscience↗

'RMT-Finder': an automated procedure to determine the Resting Motor Threshold for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

BackgroundTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies identify the Resting Motor Threshold (RMT) to calibrate stimulation intensity. However, this procedure is time-consuming and subject to variability. We developed an automated procedure to improve the efficiency and standardization of RMT determination. New methodWe developed an algorithm that measures MEP amplitudes and automatically adjusts stimulation intensity to determine the RMT. Experiment 1 compared this automated method with the manual procedure in terms of reliability and equivalence. Experiment 2 developed a "Fast" automated process, assessing it against both the manual and initial automated procedures. ResultsAcross both experiments the automated approach demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and strong agreement with the manual method (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients [&ge;]0.95), giving estimates of RMT statistically equivalent to those of manual measurements within {+/-}3% MSO, with the majority of comparisons within {+/-}2% MSO. Experiment 2 optimized the procedure, allowing empirical determination of the RMT in an average of <3 minutes with only 33-34 pulses. Comparison with existing methods RMT-Finder provides a reliable and time-efficient alternative to manual approaches. To the best of our knowledge RMT-Finder presents the first closed-loop feedback approach to identify the RMT without manual intervention. This procedure can improve standardization and reproducibility in TMS studies. ConclusionsAutomating RMT assessment allows rapid and highly reproducible assessment of this standard TMS measurement, making it viable for inclusion in routine clinical applications that require standardized procedures.

neuroscience↗