bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bohn, M. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Bohn, M. O..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Dissecting genetic variance structure and evaluating genomic prediction models for single-cross hybrids derived from Stiff Stalk and Non-Stiff Stalk maize heterotic groups

The early 20th-century discovery of heterosis and the establishment of heterotic groups transformed maize (Zea mays L.) into a keystone of global agriculture. However, maize breeding faces two significant challenges: the gradual decline of general combining ability (GCA) variance within heterotic groups and the impracticality of testing all possible single crosses in the early stages of a breeding program. Here, we developed genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-based multi-kernel models, using additive and two alternative non-additive genomic relationship matrices, to estimate the variance components associated with the GCA of Stiff Stalk (SS) and Non-Stiff Stalk (NSS) heterotic groups and the specific combining ability (SCA) arising from their crosses. We further applied these models to predict the performance of untested single-cross combinations under varying levels of parental information. We showed that the SS and NSS groups retained significant GCA variance across traits in both early- and late-maturity groups. The SS group, in contrast, exhibited no detectable GCA variance in grain yield for the intermediate-flowering subset of hybrids, highlighting a limitation for future genetic improvement. Furthermore, our results showed that GBLUP-based multi-kernel models effectively identified superior hybrids when parental information was available. In the absence of this information, however, these models underperformed compared to covariance-based approaches. Both types of non-additive matrices produced similar results, affirming the robustness of the inferred genetic architecture. Overall, this study sheds light on the future use of US maize commercial germplasm and demonstrates how GBLUP-based multi-kernel models can improve the efficiency of hybrid breeding programs.

genetics↗

Inter-variety competition dynamics in US inbred and hybrid maize

Variety mixtures provide a potential avenue in US cropping systems to improve yield stability and disease resistance. However, implementation of variety mixtures requires an understanding of the competitive dynamics of the crop. In this study, we examine the effects of plant competition both between and within plots through five unique experiments: 1) 5,000 diverse inbred lines in single-row plots, 2) hybrids in two-row plots developed from the above inbred lines, 3) over 4,000 hybrids measured in 141 locations in two-row plots as part of Genomes to Fields, 4) mixtures of two hybrids within a two-row plot planted across two years and five locations, and 5) mixtures of up to twenty hybrids in four-row plots in three locations. Across all experiments, we find that competitive interactions are extremely limited. Within inbred lines, height of the neighboring plot accounts for 1.2% of the variance in focal plot height. Similarly, neighbor height explains 1.7% of the variance in focal plot yield in hybrids developed from the inbred lines. The genetics of neighboring plots explains 1.55% of the variation in yield across 141 location-year environments, reinforcing the generally modest impacts of neighbor competition. In evaluating mixtures of hybrids in both two and four-row plots, we observe no yield penalty compared to conventional single hybrid plots, even with large height differentials of the hybrids included in the mixture or in mixtures of up to 20 hybrids within a plot. Finally, we observe that mixtures have more yield stability compared to conventional plots, highlighting a new avenue for increased stability in higher risk environments. The lack of yield penalty and stability benefits are promising for future investigations of mixtures that may complement each other in disease resistance or abiotic stress tolerance and increase overall yield stability in the field.

plant biology↗

Optimizing population simulations to accurately parallel empirical data for digital breeding

The use of computational and data-driven approaches to accelerate and optimize breeding programs is becoming common practice among plant breeders. Simulations allow breeders to evaluate potential changes in breeding schemes in a time- and cost-efficient manner. However, accurately simulating traits that match empirical trait data remains a challenge. Here we tested if incorporating information about the genetic architecture from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of maize agronomic traits with varying heritabilities into simulations can improve the concordance between simulated and empirical data in a population of hybrids developed from crosses of 333 maize recombinant inbred lines grown in four to eleven environments. Using at least 200 non-redundant top GWAS hits as causative variants, regardless of statistical significance, resulted in mean correlations between simulated and empirical trait data of 0.397 to 0.616 within environments and 0.610 to 0.915 across environments. Reducing the GWAS estimated marker effect sizes in the simulations further improved concordance with empirical data. This study provides valuable insights into methods for simulating more realistic phenotypes for digital breeding to parallel empirical trait distributions, and that these simulated traits are highly concordant with observed variance partitioning (i.e. genotype, environment, etc.), and genomic prediction performance. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYPlant breeders need to evaluate many possible changes to breeding schemes and resource allocation. One method of optimizing these changes is through computer-based simulations, which can be time- and cost-efficient. The genetic architecture of randomly simulated traits rarely parallels the genetic architecture of real-world traits, which can mislead the interpretation of such simulations. In this study, the genetic architecture of real-world traits was used to inform the simulation of digital traits to develop an optimized simulation pipeline for creating and assessing simulated breeding programs. The utility of these informed simulations is demonstrated through genomic prediction assessment, in which we show that the rank order of individuals and the distribution of traits is similar between simulated and real-world data. CORE IDEAS[bullet] Simulations allow breeders to evaluate potential changes in breeding schemes in a time- and cost-efficient manner. [bullet]Incorporating the genetic architecture of traits in simulations can improve the concordance with empirical data. [bullet]Reducing GWAS marker effect size improves correlation and distribution concordance of simulated and empirical data. [bullet]Increasing the number of causative variants beyond GWAS significance thresholds improves simulation performance. [bullet]Simulated data used in genomic prediction produces results similar to empirical genomic predicted data.

plant biology↗

Genetic variation exists within Zea mays to influence unsustainable nitrogen cycling microbiome function

Overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers in agroecosystems causes environmental pollution and human harm at a global level. Nitrogenous fertilizers provide a short-lived benefit to crops in the agroecosystem, but stimulate microbially-mediated nitrification and denitrification, processes that result in N pollution, greenhouse gas (GHG) production, and reduced soil fertility. Recent advances in plant microbiome science suggest that plants can modulate the composition and activity of rhizosphere microbial communities. These rhizosphere communities act as an extended phenotype, primed by genetic variation in the plant host. Genetic variation in traits (e.g., plant secondary metabolites, root architecture, immune system, etc.) act as mechanistic selective agents on the composition of the microbiome. Here we attempted to determine whether genetic variation exists in Zea mays for the ability to influence the extended phenotype of rhizosphere soil microbiome composition and function. Specifically, we determined whether plants influence on soil nitrogen cycling activities was altered by plant genetics and thereby allowing it to be incorporated into breeding practices. To capture an extensive amount of genetic diversity within maize we sampled the rhizosphere microbiome of a germplasm chronosequence that included ex-PVP inbreds, hybrids, and teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana and Z. mays ssp. parviglumis). We observed that potential N cycling processes were influenced by plant genetics. Teosinte and some hybrid genotypes supported microbial communities with lower potential nitrification and potential denitrification activity in the rhizosphere, while inbreds stimulated/did not inhibit these undesirable N-cycling activities. These potential differences translated to functional differences in N2O production, with teosinte plots producing less GHG than maize plots. Furthermore, within these Zea cultivars we found that plant genetics explained a significant amount of variation in the microbiome, particularly among different nitrification and denitrification functional genes within the community. We found that potential nitrification, potential incomplete denitrification, and overall denitrification rates, but not abundance of N-cycling genes of rhizosphere soils were influenced by growth stage and plant genetics. Taken together, these results suggest that crop selection can lead to changes in root phenotypes that could suppress unsustainable N-cycling processes. Reintroducing stress-adapted and "wild" root characteristics into modern germplasm may be a way to manipulate soil microbiomes at both a composition and functional level to improve sustainability.

ecology↗

Importance of genetic architecture in marker selection decisions for genomic prediction

Breeders commonly use genetic markers to predict the performance of untested individuals as a way to improve the efficiency of breeding programs. These genomic prediction models have almost exclusively used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as their source of genetic information, even though other types of markers exist, such as structural variants (SVs). Given that SVs are associated with environmental adaptation and not all of them are in linkage disequilibrium to SNPs, SVs have the potential to bring additional information to multi-environment prediction models that are not captured by SNPs alone. Here, we evaluated different marker types (SNPs and/or SVs) on prediction accuracy across a range of genetic architectures for simulated traits across multiple environments. Our results show that SVs can improve prediction accuracy by up to 19%, but it is highly dependent on the genetic architecture of the trait. Differences in prediction accuracy across marker types were more pronounced for traits with high heritability, high number of QTLs, and SVs as causative variants. In these scenarios, using SV markers resulted in better prediction accuracies than SNP markers, especially when predicting untested genotypes across environments, likely due to more predictors being in linkage disequilibrium with causative variants. The simulations revealed little impact of different effect sizes between SNPs and SVs as causative variants on prediction accuracy. This study demonstrates the importance of knowing the genetic architecture of a trait in deciding what markers and marker types to use in large scale genomic prediction modeling in a breeding program. Key messageWe demonstrate potential for improved multi-environment genomic prediction accuracy using structural variant markers. However, the degree of observed improvement is highly dependent on the genetic architecture of the trait.

plant biology↗

Linking genetic and environmental factors through marker effect networks to understand trait plasticity

Understanding how plants adapt to specific environmental changes and identifying genetic markers associated with phenotypic plasticity can help breeders develop plant varieties adapted to a rapidly changing climate. Here, we propose the use of marker effect networks as a novel method to identify markers associated with environmental adaptability. These marker effect networks are built by adapting commonly used software for building gene co-expression networks with marker effects across growth environments as the input data into the networks. To demonstrate the utility of these networks, we built networks from the marker effects of [~]10,000 non-redundant markers from 400 maize hybrids across nine environments. We demonstrate that networks can be generated using this approach, and that the markers that are co-varying are rarely in linkage disequilibrium, thus representing higher biological relevance. Multiple covarying marker modules associated with different weather factors throughout the growing season were identified within the marker effect networks. Finally, a factorial test of analysis parameters demonstrated marker effect networks are relatively robust to these options, with high overlap in modules associated with the same weather factors across analysis parameters. This novel application of network analysis provides unique insights into phenotypic plasticity, and specific environmental factors that modulate the genome.

plant biology↗