bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Boettcher, S. E. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Boettcher, S. E. P..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Dynamic prioritisation of attention when external and internal demands compete

Attention enables the prioritisation of task-relevant information, whether encountered in the external world or maintained as internal representations. While the mechanisms of attention have been extensively studied within perception and working memory, everyday cognition often confronts us with competing demands from both domains simultaneously. How attention is divided under such cross-domain demands remains poorly understood. Here, participants performed a combined perception and working-memory task in which an informative cue appeared between a working-memory display and a subsequent perceptual display. On most trials, this cue simultaneously indicated two items for prioritisation: either two encoded working-memory items or two upcoming perceptual items (within-domain attention), or one item from each domain (cross-domain attention). Combining behavioural measures with electroencephalography allowed us to characterise how dividing attention across domains shapes performance and neural activity relative to dividing attention within one domain. Behaviourally, we observed a striking asymmetry: perceptual performance benefited from cross-domain versus within-domain attention, whereas working-memory performance showed the opposite pattern. Mirroring this behavioural imbalance, time-resolved decoding revealed distinct cross-versus within-domain competition in both perception and working memory, suggesting that external and internal attention are neurally separable even when engaged simultaneously. This competition between domains was also evident in neural markers of spatial attentional orienting: while initially impaired during cross-domain attention, orienting progressively favoured external over internal information. Together, these findings show that when perception and working memory compete, attention is not divided evenly. Instead, cross-domain attention constitutes a distinct attentional state, with its own prioritisation dynamics and neural representation. Significance statementPerception and working memory are typically studied as separate targets of attention, yet real-world behaviour requires continuous negotiation between what is currently available in the external environment and what is held in mind. This study addresses how that negotiation unfolds when both sources of information become relevant at once. By directly comparing divided attention across versus within domains, we show that competition between perception and working memory is not neutral: it produces asymmetric behavioural consequences, distinct neural states, and a progressive bias in attentional prioritisation towards upcoming perceptual input. These findings suggest that cross-domain attention is not a balanced extension of within-domain attention, but a domain-biased prioritisation regime in which perception and working memory systematically trade off against each other.

neuroscience↗

Prediction Is Preserved but Long-Timescale Benefits Are Reduced in ADHD

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with atypical temporal processing across multiple cognitive domains. However, most evidence derives from simplified paradigms that isolate timing from spatial behaviour. Here, we examine how temporal prediction operates within a continuous, dynamic visual environment. Using the Dynamic Visual Search (DVS) task, we embedded spatiotemporal regularities into a sustained stream of visual events, allowing observers to implicitly learn and anticipate predictable targets. Continuous mouse tracking provided a fine-grained measure of action planning beyond discrete reaction time and accuracy metrics. Young adults diagnosed with ADHD (N=40) were compared to matched neurotypical controls (N=38). Both groups benefited from target predictability and reduced distractor load, indicating intact early spatiotemporal learning in ADHD. Across the duration of the task, however, the groups diverged. Neurotypical participants showed progressive increases in behavioural benefits from prediction, accompanied by increasingly direct and efficient mouse trajectories. In contrast, individuals with ADHD reached a plateau in prediction benefits midway through the experiment. Their performance remained stable, with minimal evidence of resource depletion, but did not show further optimisation based on learned regularities. These findings suggest that while prediction formation is preserved in ADHD, its progressive utilisation across longer timescales is attenuated. Rather than reflecting a primary deficit in learning or sustained attention, ADHD may involve altered long-timescale integration or weighting of predictive information in dynamic environments.

neuroscience↗

Differences in dynamic motor selection in stuttering

Stuttering involves interruptions to the smooth flow of speech occurring mostly at syllable onset.1 Speech fluency is enhanced in people who stutter (PWS) by external timing cues.2 This has been taken to indicate that difficulties in the temporal organisation of action selection and initiation during speech contribute to stuttering.3 An important unanswered question is whether putative temporal coordination difficulties are specific to speech or generalise to other actions. Here, we examined the temporal organisation of hand action selection in PWS. Twenty PWS and twenty typically fluent speakers (TFS) underwent magnetoencephalography (MEG) recording while performing a visuomotor working-memory task that encouraged temporally specific selection, preparation, and shifts between hand actions. Lateralised sensorimotor mu/beta-frequency (8-30 Hz) activity modulation accompanying hand-action prioritisation was weaker in PWS than TFS. Strikingly, this effect was specific to a period of high uncertainty regarding which action to select and when. Despite these differences, lateralised mu/beta modulation was functionally related to reaction times in both groups and reaction times were well matched between PWS and TFS. The findings suggest a general disruption of temporal structuring of action selection and preparation in stuttering.

neuroscience↗

Feature-temporal predictions dynamically modulate performance, feature-based attentional capture, and motor response activity during visual search

Recent research has investigated visual search in dynamic environments and considered how temporal predictions modulate behaviour over time. Spatiotemporal predictions have been shown to adaptively guide behaviour during search to improve target detection at temporally-likely locations. The utility of non-spatial, feature-temporal predictions is less intuitive. The present study investigated whether and how behaviour may be guided toward feature-temporally predictable targets during visual search in crowded and dynamic displays. We tested 1) whether visual attention is guided toward target-relevant features in a temporally specific manner and 2) whether our motor system is temporally tuned accordingly. Participants searched for two distinct targets (non-overlapping colour-shape combinations) in a free-viewing dynamic visual-search task. During an initial learning session, each target identity appeared at a predictable time. In a following testing session, some targets appeared at unpredicted times. Targets locations were always unpredictable. We compared the efficiency of identifying targets appearing at predicted versus unpredicted times to test for performance benefits of feature-temporal predictability. In addition, we measured whether gaze fixation was captured by distractors that shared overlapping features with temporally predicted targets. Electromyography recordings were used to test for anticipatory muscle activity tuned to the timing of predictable targets. Results indicated that learning the task regularities led to dynamic modulation of participants efficiency at identifying targets, their feature-based attentional capture, and temporally tuned muscle activity. The work highlights the flexibility of temporal expectations in guiding behaviour even under spatial uncertainty.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Neural signatures of flexible temporal orienting under spatial and motor uncertainty

The goal-dependent use of temporal expectations enhances visual performance, even without concurrent spatial or motor predictions, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. To identify the stages of stimulus processing influenced by temporal orienting of attention, we recorded EEG while participants performed a visual identification task manipulating relevance and temporal predictability of targets. Colored targets appeared in one of two simultaneous visual streams. One color appeared unpredictably while two others appeared predictably early or late. Targets appeared in either stream and required a localization response using the corresponding hand. On each trial, one target was cued as task-relevant. Behaviorally, participants used temporal expectations flexibly to optimize processing of goal-relevant targets. The target-defining cue elicited a contingent negative variation (CNV), modulated by the temporal predictability of anticipated early vs. late targets. Target-related event related potentials (ERP) showed strong modulation by target relevance at multiple stages. Modulations impacted target-selection (N2pc), motor preparation (LRP), and late decision-related factors (P300). Interestingly, only the P300 was additionally modulated by the temporal predictability of targets. The findings reveal how temporal attention can impact multiple stages of stimulus processing through the relevance and temporal predictability of targets even without spatial or motor certainty.

neuroscience↗

Neural dynamics of reselecting visual and motor contents in working memory after external interference

In everyday tasks, we must often shift our focus away from internal representations held in working memory to engage with perceptual events in the external world. Here, we investigated how our internal focus is reestablished following an interrupting task by tracking the reselection of visual representations and their associated action plans in working memory. Specifically, we ask whether reselection occurs for both visual and motor memory attributes and when this reselection occurs. We developed a visual-motor working-memory task in which participants were retrospectively cued to select one of two memory items before being interrupted by a perceptual discrimination task. To determine what information was reselected, the memory items had distinct visual and motor attributes. To determine when internal representations were reselected, the interrupting task was presented at one of three distinct time points following the retro-cue. We employed electroencephalography time-frequency analyses to track the initial selection and later reselection of visual and motor representations, as operationalized through modulations of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity relative to the memorized item location (visual) and of central beta (13-30 Hz) activity relative to the required response hand (motor). Our results showed that internal visual and motor contents were concurrently reselected immediately after completing the interrupting task, rather than only when internal information was required for memory-guided behavior. Thus, following interruption, we swiftly resume our internal focus in working memory through the simultaneous reselection of memorized visual representations and their associated action plans, thereby restoring internal contents to a ready-to-use state. Significance statementA key challenge for working memory is to maintain past visual representations and their associated actions while engaging with the external environment. Our cognitive system must, therefore, often juggle multiple tasks within a common time frame. Despite the ubiquity of multi-task situations in everyday life, working memory has predominantly been studied devoid of additional perceptual, attentional, and response demands during the retention interval. Here, we investigate the neural dynamics of returning to internal contents following task-relevant interruptions. Particularly, we identify which attributes of internal representations are reselected and when this reselection occurs. Our findings demonstrate that both visual and motor contents are reselected immediately and in tandem after completion of an external, interrupting task.

neuroscience↗

Dynamic prioritisation of sensory and motor contents in working memory

Internal selective attention prioritises both sensory and motor contents in working memory to guide prospective behaviour. Prior research has shown how attention modulation of sensory contents is flexible and temporally tuned depending on access requirements, but whether the prioritisation of motor contents follows similar flexible dynamics remains elusive. Also uncharted is the degree of co-dependence of sensory and motor modulation, which gets at the nature of both working-memory representations and internal attention functions. To address these questions, we independently tracked the prioritisation of sensory and motor working-memory contents as a function of dynamically evolving temporal expectations. The design orthogonally manipulated when an item location (left vs right side) and associated prospective action (left vs right hand) would be relevant. Contralateral modulation of posterior alpha (8-12 Hz) activity in electroencephalography (EEG) tracked prioritisation of the item location, while contralateral modulation of central mu/beta (8-30 Hz) activity tracked response prioritisation. Proactive and dynamic alpha and mu/beta modulation confirmed the flexible and temporally structured prioritisation of sensory and motor contents alike. Intriguingly, the prioritisation of sensory and motor contents was temporally uncoupled, showing dissociable patterns of modulation. The findings reveal multiple modulatory functions of internal attention operating in tandem to prepare relevant aspects of internal representations for adaptive behaviour.

neuroscience↗

Neural dynamics of shifting attention between perception and working-memory contents

In everyday tasks, our focus of attention shifts seamlessly between contents in the sensory environment and internal memory representations. Yet, research has mainly considered external and internal attention in isolation. We used magnetoencephalography to compare the neural dynamics of shifting attention to visual contents within vs. between the external and internal domains. Participants performed a combined perception and working-memory task in which two sequential cues guided attention to upcoming (external) or memorised (internal) sensory information. Critically, the second cue could redirect attention to visual content within the same or alternative domain as the first cue. Multivariate decoding unveiled distinct patterns of human brain activity when shifting attention within vs. between domains. Brain activity distinguishing within- from between-domain shifts was broadly distributed and highly dynamic. Intriguingly, crossing domains did not invoke an additional stage prior to shifting. Alpha lateralisation, a canonical marker of shifting spatial attention, showed no delay when cues redirected attention to the same vs. alternative domain. Instead, evidence suggested that neural states associated with a given domain linger and influence subsequent shifts of attention within vs. between domains. Our findings provide the first insights into the neural dynamics that govern attentional shifts between perception and working memory. Significance StatementDuring almost every natural behaviour, our attention regularly shifts between sensory and memory contents. Although the systems and mechanisms of attentional control and modulation within the external and internal domains have been heavily studied in isolation, how attention crosses between these domains remains uncharted territory. Here, we provide the first study to investigate brain dynamics associated with shifting attention between contents in the sensory environment and memory representations. Using a novel experimental design, we isolated the patterns and dynamics of brain activity associated with shifting attention within vs. between the external and internal domains. Our findings reveal early, dynamic, and distributed patterns of activity that distinguish within- from between-domain shifts, offering fascinating initial insights, and opening new questions for investigation.

neuroscience↗

Flexible early prospection of potential behavior in working memory

For visual working memory to serve upcoming behavior, it is crucial that we prepare for the potential use of working-memory contents ahead of time. Recent studies have demonstrated how the prospection and planning for an upcoming manual action starts early after visual encoding, and occurs alongside visual retention. Here, we address whether such output planning in visual working memory flexibly adapts to different visual-motor mappings, and occurs even when an upcoming action will only potentially become relevant for behavior. Participants performed a visual-motor working memory task in which they remembered one or two visual items for later (potential) use. We tracked planning of upcoming behavior through contralateral attenuation of beta-band activity - a canonical motor-cortical EEG signature of manual-action planning. This revealed how action encoding and subsequent planning alongside visual working memory (1) reflects anticipated task demands rather than specific visual-motor mappings, (2) occurs even for actions that will only potentially become relevant for behavior, and (3) is associated with better performance for the encoded item, at the expense of performance to other working-memory content. This reveals how the potential prospective use of visual working memory content is flexibly planned early on, with consequences for later performance.

neuroscience↗