Biology subjects

Boets, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Boets, B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Interpersonal Synchronization of Brain and Body Tracks Attention and Listening Engagement

Purpose: Speech perception is a fundamental part of everyday communication that relies on more than simple identification of words and sentences. Attention and listening engagement both contribute to speech perception, while representing distinct aspects of the listening experience. Attention is typically associated with cognitive focus, whereas listening engagement additionally involves cognitive and affective immersion in sound. Despite their importance, these states remain difficult to disentangle, behaviorally and physiologically. Both have been linked to interpersonal synchronization (the synchronization of biobehavioral signals across individuals), raising questions about what this synchronization actually reflects. Method: In this study, we disentangled attention and listening engagement by independently manipulating both factors within a single experiment. Thirty participants listened to two simultaneously presented streams of meaningful speech and were instructed to focus on only one. Both attended and unattended stimuli were designed to be either engaging or non-engaging. Neural activity was recorded using EEG, while physiological responses were measured using heart rate and electrodermal activity. Results: Interpersonal synchronization was computed from neural and bodily signals, alongside a self-report measure of listening engagement and auditory attention decoding (AAD), a neural measure of selective attention. Interpersonal synchronization of all three modalities significantly predicted listening engagement, whereas neural interpersonal synchronization was the only measure that significantly predicted attention. These findings suggest that attention is primarily driven by cognitive processes represented in the brain, while listening engagement additionally involves affective processes that are more strongly reflected in bodily responses. Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrates that different forms of interpersonal synchronization reflect distinct dimensions of the listening experience and supports interpersonal synchronization as a potential objective marker of listening engagement.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Interpersonal synchronization as an objective measure of listening engagement

Listening engagement plays a crucial role in effective communication and knowledge transfer, reflecting a state of deep absorption in an auditory stimulus. The available behavioral assessments of listening engagement are limited in capturing its multidimensional nature. Measuring listening engagement objectively using brain and body signals is a compelling alternative. In particular, interpersonal synchronization--observed through synchronized neural and physiological responses among listeners--may offer a promising objective measure. In this study, we examined synchronization of brain activity, heart rate, and electrodermal activity between participants while they listened to engaging and non-engaging stories. Subjective engagement ratings were collected as a ground truth reference. Results showed higher interpersonal synchronization across all modalities when participants listened to engaging stories compared to non-engaging ones, with significant correlations between synchronization measures and ratings of subjective engagement. These results confirm that synchronization may be a reliable, objective marker of listening engagement. We anticipate that these results will provide a powerful framework for future research in relevant domains, including auditory neuroscience, education, and communication science, and enable impactful real-world applications, such as automatically tracking audience engagement in education, entertainment, and broader societal contexts.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Social touch observation in adults with autism: intact neural representations of affective meaning but lack of embodied resonance

Humans can easily grasp the affective meaning of touch when observing social interactions. Several neural systems support this ability, including theory of mind (ToM) and somatosensory resonance systems, but it is unclear how these systems are affected in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Individuals with ASD are characterized by impairments in social interaction and the use of (non)verbal communication such as social and reciprocal touch. The present study applies an ecologically valid stimulus set and multivoxel pattern fMRI neuroimaging to pinpoint atypicalities in the neural circuitry underlying socio-affective touch observation in adults with ASD as compared to matched neurotypical controls. The MVPA results reveal that the affective meaning of touch is well represented in the temporoparietal junction, a core ToM mentalizing area, in both groups. Conversely, only the neurotypical group hosts affective touch representations in the somatosensory cortex, not the ASD group, yielding a significant group difference. Lastly, individuals with a more positive attitude towards receiving, witnessing, and providing social touch and with a higher score on social responsivity, show more differentiated representations of the affective meaning of touch in these somatosensory areas. Together, our findings imply that individuals with ASD are able to cognitively represent the affective meaning of touch, but they lack the spontaneous embodied somatosensory resonance when observing social touch communications. Individual differences in this diminished resonance appear to be related to social touch avoidance and quantitative autism traits.\n\nSignificance StatementAutism is characterized by socio-communicative impairments, including abnormal processing of interpersonal touch. Little is known about the neural basis of atypicalities in social touch processing in autism. Here, adults with and without autism watched video clips displaying social touch interactions and judged the affective valence of the touch. Subsequently, they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while watching the same videos. Brain activity patterns demonstrate that adults with autism show intact cognitive understanding (i.e. \"knowing\") of observed socio-affective touch experiences but lack of embodied emotional resonance (i.e. \"feeling\"). This lack of emotional resonance is linked to social touch avoidance and quantitative autism traits. These findings highlight that the depth of experiencing the state of others is shallower in people with autism.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Neural Representations Behind Social Norm Inferences In Humans

Humans are highly skilled in social reasoning, e.g., inferring thoughts of others. This mentalizing ability systematically recruits brain regions such as Temporo-Parietal Junction (TPJ), Precuneus (PC) and medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC). Further, posterior mPFC is associated with allocentric mentalizing and conflict monitoring while anterior mPFC is associated with self-related mentalizing. Here we extend this work to how we reason not just about what one person thinks but about the abstract shared social norm. We apply functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate neural representations while participants judge the social congruency between emotional auditory in relation to visual scenes according to how most people would perceive it. Behaviorally, judging according to a social norm increased the similarity of response patterns among participants. Multivoxel pattern analysis revealed that social congruency information was not represented in visual and auditory areas, but was clear in most parts of the mentalizing network: TPJ, PC and posterior (but not anterior) mPFC. Furthermore, interindividual variability in anterior mPFC representations was inversely related to the behavioral ability to adjust to the social norm. Our results suggest that social norm inferencing is associated with a distributed and partially individually specific representation of social congruency in the mentalizing network.

neuroscience↗