Biology subjects

Boesing, A. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Boesing, A. L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Accounting for spatial interactions in the upscaling of ecosystem services

O_LIMaps of ecosystem service (ES) supply are frequently used to guide spatial planning, policy making, and ecosystem management. However, these are typically based upon coarse land-cover proxies. This approach lacks a strong mechanistic basis, and neglects spatial biodiversity dynamics and interactions among landscape properties that can modify ES provision. C_LIO_LIWe present an analytical framework for ES upscaling that incorporates spatial interactions between landscape properties to determine ES supply. The resulting models can be viewed as a spatially informed ES production function. The approach comprises seven steps that include several elements absent from most existing approaches, notably a procedure for identifying geodata variables that represent the true mechanistic drivers, the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model, and modification following expert feedback on the selected model. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate the approach using two example ES from German grasslands: biodiversity conservation and water supply. We show that the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model improved model predictions from 15% to 33% depending on the ES evaluated. In addition, inclusion of spatial interactions led to reduced error associated with the upscaled estimates. C_LIO_LIBy overcoming several shortcomings of existing, upscaling approaches we generate resulting maps of ES supply that can more reliably inform spatial planning Further, the underlying models allow for simulation of changes in the drivers of ES supply and estimation of respective outcomes. These advantages have the potential to better link detailed local-scale ecological understanding and land management with large-scale ES supply mapping, and thus better inform decision making and spatial planning. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Mobile species' responses to surrounding land use generate trade-offs among nature's contributions to people

Agricultural landscapes provide material, non-material and regulating contributions that affect human wellbeing. The responses of these natures contributions to people (NCP) to land-use patterns depend on supporting biota with different habitat requirements, generating trade-offs and synergies. Predictions of NCP trade-offs could inform land-use decisions, but these do not typically account for the effects of land-use patterns on the movement of NCP-providing species, nor for interactions among NCP providers. To explore spatial trade-offs and synergies in eight indicators of NCP, we used Bayesian models that allow for interactions among land uses and among NCP using data from 150 grassland sites across rural Germany. We found that spatial arrangements of forest and open habitat influenced many NCP: acoustic diversity, birdwatching potential, natural enemy abundance and pollination. In particular, the amount and proximity of land uses in the surrounding landscape, especially forest and open habitat, drove the supply of most NCP. However, NCP provided by smaller-bodied taxa (herbivory and pathogen infection) responded weakly to landscape factors. Multiple NCP provided by a given taxon responded differently to their surrounding landscape (e.g. bird-provided caterpillar predation and seed predation), leading to trade-offs among NCP over short distances ([≤]60 m). These were caused by different rates and directions of response to amount and location of land uses. Resulting spatial predictions revealed that grassland-dominated or mixed forest-grassland areas better maximize beneficial NCP and minimize detrimental NCP across landscapes than purely forest-dominated areas. This suggests promoting semi-natural vegetation in agricultural landscapes to provide greater-than-additive benefits to net NCP supply. Significance StatementLand use affects natures contributions to people (NCP), including those provided by mobile species, in complex ways. Variation in the responses of species to the amount and location of land uses results in NCP trade-offs across landscapes, but decision-makers lack the capacity to spatially predict these trade-offs. We predict how the supply of both beneficial and detrimental NCP and associated trade-offs vary across diverse rural landscapes and find that grassland-dominated or mixed forest-grassland areas deliver higher net NCP supply than forest-dominated areas in our study system. Our findings support policies for promoting semi-natural vegetation cover in agricultural landscapes, as these may provide non-additive benefits for NCP.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Old, deciduous stands support both high biodiversity and carbon storage in German forests

Ecosystems worldwide face threats related to human-driven degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Addressing these challenges requires management strategies that combine biodiversity conservation with climate change mitigation. Here, we aimed to identify local-scale management actions that promote biodiversity at multiple trophic levels while also promoting carbon storage and sequestration. We combined data on the diversity of nine taxonomic groups (plants, birds, moths, Mollusca, soil fungi, active soil bacteria, Cercozoan and Endomyxan soil protists, Oomycotan soil protists, and nematodes), with above- and belowground carbon storage in 150 temperate forest plots in three regions of Germany. These were dominated by European beech, pine, spruce and oak. We investigated the relationships between multiple forest structure and management variables, biodiversity and carbon storage and sequestration in forest plots with different management types. Carbon storage was 32% higher in uneven-aged than even-aged forests and increased with mean tree diameter, while carbon sequestration in trees was 15% higher in even-aged than uneven-aged stands. Mean tree diameter was positively related to overall biodiversity, especially bird species richness and the richness of forest specialist birds. Oak and beech-dominated stands harboured higher biodiversity than stands dominated by conifers (especially Pine). One exception to this was the richness of plant species and forest specialist plants, which were highest in spruce plantations. Surprisingly, deadwood input did not significantly affect the diversity of any taxonomic group in this study. By showing that older forests with a high proportion of uneven-aged broad-leafed trees, or oak-dominated forests, can promote both biodiversity and carbon storage, our results could help inform sustainable local-scale forest management in Central Europe that promotes both biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. These findings can form the basis of further larger-scale studies investigating such relations at larger spatial scales to inform landscape-level recommendations for sustainable multifunctional forest management.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

A fast-slow trait continuum at the level of entire communities

Across the tree of life, organismal functional strategies form a continuum from slow-to fast-growing organisms, in response to common drivers such as resource availability and disturbance. However, the synchronization of these strategies at the entire community level is untested. We combine trait data for >2800 above-and belowground taxa from 14 trophic guilds spanning a disturbance and resource availability gradient in German grasslands. Most guilds consistently respond to these drivers through both direct and trophically-mediated effects, resulting in a slow-fast axis at the level of the entire community. Fast trait communities were also associated with faster rates of whole ecosystem functioning. These findings demonstrate that slow and fast strategies can be manifested at the level of whole ecosystems, opening new avenues of ecosystem-level functional classification.

ecology↗