Biology subjects

Boecker, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Boecker, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Chemistry-based vectors map the chemical space of natural biomes from untargeted mass spectrometry data

Untargeted metabolomics can comprehensively map the chemical space of a biome, but is limited by low annotation rates (<10%). We used chemistry-based vectors, consisting of molecular fingerprints or chemical compound classes, predicted from mass spectrometry data, to characterize compounds and samples. These chemical characteristics vectors (CCVs) estimate the fraction of compounds with specific chemical properties in a sample. Unlike the aligned MS1 data with intensity information, CCVs incorporate actual chemical properties of compounds, offering deeper insights into sample comparisons. Thus, we identified key compound classes differentiating biomes, such as ethers which are enriched in environmental biomes, while steroids enriched in animal host-related biomes. In biomes with greater variability, CCVs revealed key clustering compound classes, such as organonitrogen compounds in animal distal gut and lipids in animal secretions. CCVs thus enhance the interpretation of untargeted metabolomic data, providing a quantifiable and generalizable understanding of the chemical space of natural biomes.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Small molecule machine learning: All models are wrong, some may not even be useful

Small molecule machine learning tries to predict chemical, biochemical or biological properties from the structure of a molecule. Applications include prediction of toxicity, ligand binding or retention time. A recent trend is to develop end-to-end models that avoid the explicit integration of domain knowledge via inductive bias. A central assumption in doing so, is that there is no coverage bias in the training and evaluation data, meaning that these data are a representative subset of the true distribution we want to learn. Usually, the domain of applicability is neither considered nor analyzed for such large-scale end-to-end models. Here, we investigate how well certain large-scale datasets from the field cover the space of all known biomolecular structures. Investigation of coverage requires a sensible distance measure between molecular structures. We use a well-known distance measure based on solving the Maximum Common Edge Subgraph (MCES) problem, which agrees well with the chemical intuition of similarity between compounds. Unfortunately, this computational problem is provably hard, severely restricting the use of the corresponding distance measure in large-scale studies. We introduce an exact approach that combines Integer Linear Programming and intricate heuristic bounds to ensure efficient computations and dependable results. We find that several large-scale datasets frequently used in this domain of machine learning are far from a uniform coverage of known biomolecular structures. This severely confines the predictive power of models trained on this data. Next, we propose two further approaches to check if a training dataset differs substantially from the distribution of known biomolecular structures. On the positive side, our methods may allow creators of large-scale datasets to identify regions in molecular structure space where it is advisable to provide additional training data.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

GNPS Dashboard: Collaborative Analysis of Mass Spectrometry Data in the Web Browser

Access to web-based platforms has enabled scientists to perform research remotely. A critical aspect of mass spectrometry data analysis is the inspection, analysis, and visualization of the raw data to validate data quality and confirm statistical observations. We developed the GNPS Dashboard, a web-based data visualization tool, to facilitate synchronous collaborative inspection, visualization, and analysis of private and public mass spectrometry data remotely.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Significance estimation for large scale untargeted metabolomics annotations

The annotation of small molecules in untargeted mass spectrometry relies on the matching of fragment spectra to reference library spectra. While various spectrum-spectrum match scores exist, the field lacks statistical methods for estimating the false discovery rates (FDR) of these annotations. We present empirical Bayes and target-decoy based methods to estimate the false discovery rate. Relying on estimations of false discovery rates, we explore the effect of different spectrum-spectrum match criteria on the number and the nature of the molecules annotated. We show that the spectral matching settings needs to be adjusted for each project. By adjusting the scoring parameters and thresholds, the number of annotations rose, on average, by +139% (ranging from -92% up to +5705%) when compared to a default parameter set available at GNPS. The FDR estimation methods presented will enable a user to define the scoring criteria for large scale analysis of untargeted small molecule data that has been essential in the advancement of large scale proteomics, transcriptomics, and genomics science.

bioinformatics↗