Biology subjects

Boebinger, S. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Boebinger, S. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Cortical response to balance perturbation is more sensitive in modern dancers than nondancers during biomechanically similar balance recovery

Motor skill expertise can facilitate more automatic movement, engaging less cortical activity while producing appropriate motor output. Accordingly, cortical-evoked N1 responses to balance perturbation, assessed using electroencephalography (EEG), are smaller in young and older adults with better balance. These responses may thus reflect individual balance challenge versus functional, or objective, task difficulty. However, the effect of balance expertise on cortical responses to balance perturbation has not been studied. We hypothesized that balance ability gained though long-term training facilitates more automatic balance control. Using professional modern dancers as balance experts, we compared cortical-evoked responses and biomechanics of the balance-correcting response between modern dancers and nondancers. We predicted that modern dancers would have smaller cortical-evoked responses and better balance recovery at equivalent levels of balance challenge. Support-surface perturbations were normalized to individual challenge levels by delivering perturbations scaled to 60% and 140% of each individuals step threshold. In contrast to our prediction, dancers exhibited larger N1 responses compared to nondancers while demonstrating similar biomechanical responses. Our results suggest dancers have greater cortical sensitivity to balance perturbations than nondancers. Further, dancer N1 responses modulated across perturbation magnitudes according to differences in objective task difficulty. In contrast, nondancer N1 responses modulated as a function of individual challenge level. Our findings suggest dance training increases sensitivity of the initial, cortical N1 response to balance perturbation, supporting postural alignment to an objective reference. The N1 response may reflect differences in balance-error processing that are altered with specific long-term training and may have implications for rehabilitation. NEW & NOTEWORTHYModern dancers show larger cortical responses to balance perturbations than nondancers, suggesting a greater sensitivity to perturbations. These results contrast with evidence of larger cortical-evoked responses in young adults with poorer balance, consistent with the cortical N1 response being a balance error assessment signal. Whereas nondancers scaled cortical responses by individual differences in N1 amplitude, dancers cortical responses were scaled to objective differences in perturbation magnitude, suggesting increased postural awareness due to training.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Cortically-mediated muscle responses to balance perturbations increase with perturbation magnitude in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease

We lack a clear understanding of how cortical contributions to balance are altered in aging and Parkinsons disease (PD), which limits development of rehabilitation strategies. Processes like balance control are typically mediated through brainstem circuits, with higher-order circuits becoming engaged as needed. Using reactive balance recovery, we investigated how hierarchical neural mechanisms shape balance- correcting muscle activity across task difficulty in older adults (OAs) with and without PD. We hypothesize that feedback loops involving brainstem and cortical circuits contribute to balance control, and cortical engagement increases with challenge, aging, and PD. We decomposed perturbation-evoked agonist and antagonist muscle activity into hierarchical components based on latency using neuromechanical models consisting of two feedback loops with different delays to reflect different neural conduction and processing times. Agonist muscle activity was decomposed into two components that both increased with balance challenge in both groups. The first component occurred [~]120ms and the second occurred [~]210ms, consistent with the latencies of brainstem and transcortical circuits, respectively. Exploratory comparisons to young adults revealed larger transcortical components in OA and PD groups at lower balance challenge levels, consistent with increased cortical involvement with aging. Antagonist muscle activity included destabilizing and stabilizing components, with the destabilizing component correlating to balance ability in OAs but not in PD. These findings demonstrate that neuromechanical models can identify changes in the hierarchical control of balance without direct brain measurements. Identifying cortical contributions during balance control may complement clinical measures of balance ability to inform balance rehabilitation and assistive devices. NEW & NOTEWORTHYA neuromechanical model can decompose perturbation evoked muscle activity into components attributed to brainstem and higher-order sensorimotor feedback based on latency. In older adults with and without PD contributions from higher-order neural circuits increase with balance challenge and are related to clinical measures of balance ability. Interpreting the neural substrates of motor output for balance may reveal individual differences in the hierarchical control of balance, that could inform rehabilitation.

neuroscience↗