bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Bishop, D. V. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Bishop, D. V. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Testing the unitary theory of language lateralisation using functional transcranial Doppler sonography study in adults

Cerebral lateralisation for language can vary from task to task, but it is unclear if this reflects error of measurement or independent lateralisation of different language systems. We used functional transcranial Doppler sonography to assess language lateralisation in 37 adults (7 left-handers) on six tasks, each given on two occasions. Tasks taxed different aspects of language function. A preregistered structural equation analysis was used to compare models of means and covariances. For most people, a single lateralised factor explained most of the covariance between tasks. A minority, however, showed dissociation of asymmetry, giving a second factor. This was mostly derived from a receptive task, which was highly reliable but not lateralised. The results suggest that variation in strength of language lateralisation reflects true individual differences and not just error of measurement. Inclusion of several tasks in a laterality battery makes it easier to detect cases of atypical asymmetry.

neuroscience

Sex chromosome trisomies are not associated with atypical lateralisation for language

AimIndividuals with a sex chromosome trisomy (SCT) have disproportionate problems with language compared to nonverbal skills. This may result from disruption to the typical left hemisphere bias for language processing. We tested the hypothesis that SCTs would be associated with reduced left lateralisation for language.\n\nMethodIn a cross-sectional design, language laterality was measured during an animation description task using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (fTCD). Data were available for 75 children with an SCT (26 47,XXX girls, 25 47,XXY boys, and 24 47,XYY boys; mean age was 11;4 years, SD = 3;10 years), and 132 comparison children with typical karyotypes (69 boys; mean age was 9;1 years, SD = 1;7 years).\n\nResultsLateralisation for language did not differ between the SCT and comparison groups, either in mean laterality index or relative frequency of each laterality category (left, bilateral and right). There were no differences when splitting the SCT group by trisomy. Handedness also showed no group effects.\n\nInterpretationOur data provide no evidence for disrupted lateralisation for language in SCTs. The brain basis of the cognitive phenotype in SCTs is unlikely to be a failure of the left hemisphere to specialise for language, as previously suggested.\n\nWhat this paper addsO_LIChildren with a sex chromosome trisomy (SCT) have typically lateralised language.\nC_LIO_LIThis disconfirms theories linking language problems to hemispheric specialization in SCTs\nC_LI

neuroscience