Biology subjects

Bischoff, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Bischoff, R..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Monarchs sabotage milkweed to acquire toxins, not to disarm plant defence

Sabotaging milkweed by monarch caterpillars is a textbook example for disarming plant defence. By severing leaf veins, monarchs are thought to prevent toxic latex flow to their feeding site. Here we show that sabotaging by monarch caterpillars is not an avoidance strategy. Instead, caterpillars actively ingest outflowing latex to increase sequestration of toxic latex cardenolides. Comparisons with caterpillars of the related non-sequestering common crow butterfly revealed three lines of evidence supporting our hypothesis. First, monarchs sabotage inconsistently and therefore the behaviour is not mandatory to feed on milkweed, while sabotaging in crows precedes every feeding event. Second, monarchs eagerly drink latex, while crow caterpillars spit out latex during sabotaging. Third, monarchs raised on detached leaves sequestered more cardenolides when latex was supplemented artificially. Hence, we conclude, that monarchs converted the "sabotage to avoid" strategy of their relatives into a "sabotage to consume" strategy for acquiring toxins for defence.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Proteome coverage after simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid-liquid extraction

Proteo-metabolomics is essential in systems biology and simultaneous proteo-metabolome extraction by liquid-liquid extraction (SPM-LLE) allows extraction of the metabolome and proteome from the same sample. Since the proteome is present as a pellet in SPM-LLE it must be solubilized for quantitative proteomics. Solubilization and proteome extraction is a critical factor in the information that can be obtained at the proteome level. In this study, we investigated the performance of two surfactants (sodium deoxycholate (SDC), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) and urea with respect to proteome coverage and extraction efficiency of an interphase proteome pellet generated by methanol-chloroform based SPM-LLE. We also investigated the extent to which the performance differs when the proteome is extracted from the interphase pellet or by direct cell lysis. Our study reveals that the proteome coverages between the two surfactants and urea for the SPM-LLE interphase pellet were very similar, but the extraction efficiencies differed significantly. While SDS led to enrichment of basic proteins, which were mainly ribosomal and ribonuclear proteins, urea was the most efficient extraction agent for simultaneous proteo-metabolome analysis. The results of our study also show that the performance of surfactants (SDC, SDS) for quantitative proteomics is better when the proteome was extracted by direct cell lysis and not from an interphase pellet. In contrast, the performance of urea for quantitative proteomics was significantly better when the proteome was extracted from an interphase pellet and by direct cell lysis.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Comparative assessment of quantification methods for tumor tissue phosphoproteomics

With increasing sensitivity and accuracy in mass spectrometry, the tumor phosphoproteome is getting into reach. However, the selection of quantitation techniques best-suited to the biomedical question and diagnostic requirements remains a trial and error decision as no study has directly compared their performance for tumor tissue phosphoproteomics. We compared label-free quantification (LFQ), spike-in-SILAC (stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) and TMT isobaric tandem mass tags technology for quantitative phosphosite profiling in tumor tissue. TMT offered the lowest accuracy and the highest precision and robustness towards different phosphosite abundances and matrices. Spike-in-SILAC offered the best compromise between these features but suffered from a low phosphosite coverage. LFQ offered the lowest precision but the highest number of identifications. Both spike-in-SILAC and LFQ presented susceptibility to matrix effects. Match between run (MBR)-based analysis enhanced the phosphosite coverage across technical replicates in LFQ and spike-in-SILAC but further reduced the precision and robustness of quantification. The choice of quantitative methodology is critical for both study design such as sample size in sample groups and quantified phosphosites, and comparison of published cancer phosphoproteomes. Using ovarian cancer tissue as an example, our study builds a resource for the design and analysis of quantitative phosphoproteomic studies in cancer research and diagnostics.

biochemistry↗