Biology subjects

Birol, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Birol, I..

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2017

ARCS: Assembly Roundup by Chromium Scaffolding

Sequencing of human genomes is now routine, and assembly of shotgun reads is increasingly feasible. However, assemblies often fail to inform about chromosome-scale structure due to lack of linkage information over long stretches of DNA - a shortcoming that is being addressed by new sequencing protocols, such as linked reads from 10X Genomics. Here we present ARCS, an application that utilizes the barcoding information contained in linked reads to further organize draft genomes into highly contiguous assemblies. We show how the contiguity of an ABySS H. sapiens genome assembly can be increased over six-fold using moderate coverage (25-fold) Chromium data. We expect ARCS to have broad utility in harnessing the barcoding information contained in Chromium data for connecting high-quality sequences in genome assembly drafts. Availability: http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/arcs\n\nSupplementary information available online.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

It’s okay to be green: Draft genome of the North American Bullfrog (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana)

Frogs play important ecological roles as sentinels, insect control and food sources. Several species are important model organisms for scientific research to study embryogenesis, development, immune function, and endocrine signaling. The globally-distributed Ranidae (true frogs) are the largest frog family, and have substantial evolutionary distance from the model laboratory Xenopus frog species. Consequently, the extensive Xenopus genomic resources are of limited utility for Ranids and related frog species. More widely applicable amphibian genomic data is urgently needed as more than two-thirds of known species are currently threatened or are undergoing population declines.\n\nHerein, we report on the first genome sequence of a Ranid species, an adult male North American bullfrog (Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana). We assembled high-depth Illumina reads (66-fold coverage), into a 5.8 Gbp (NG50 = 57.7 kbp) draft genome using ABySS v1.9.0. The assembly was scaffolded with LINKS and RAILS using pseudo-long-reads from targeted denovo assembler Kollector and Illumina Synthetic Long-Reads, as well as reads from long fragment (MPET) libraries. We predicted over 22,000 protein-coding genes using the MAKER2 pipeline and identified the genomic loci of 6,227 candidate long noncoding RNAs (IncRNAs) from a composite reference bullfrog transcriptome. Mitochondrial sequence analysis supported Lithobates as a subgenus of Rana. RNA-Seq experiments identified ~6,000 thyroid hormone- responsive transcripts in the back skin of premetamorphic tadpoles; the majority of which regulate DNA/RNA processing. Moreover, 1/6th of differentially-expressed transcripts were putative lncRNAs. Our draft bullfrog genome will serve as a useful resource for the amphibian research community.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Overlapping long sequence reads: Current innovations and challenges in developing sensitive, specific and scalable algorithms

Identifying overlaps between error-prone long reads, specifically those from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PB), is essential for certain downstream applications, including error correction and de novo assembly. Though akin to the read-to-reference alignment problem, read-to-read overlap detection is a distinct problem that can benefit from specialized algorithms that perform efficiently and robustly on high error rate long reads. Here, we review the current state-of-the-art read-to-read overlap tools for error-prone long reads, including BLASR, DALIGNER, MHAP, GraphMap, and Minimap. These specialized bioinformatics tools differ not just in their algorithmic designs and methodology, but also in their robustness of performance on a variety of datasets, time and memory efficiency, and scalability. We highlight the algorithmic features of these tools, as well as their potential issues and biases when utilizing any particular method. We benchmarked these tools, tracking their resource needs and computational performance, and assessed the specificity and precision of each. The concepts surveyed may apply to future sequencing technologies, as scalability is becoming more relevant with increased sequencing throughput.\n\nContactcjustin@bcgsc.ca; ibirol@bcgsc.ca\n\nSupplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

bioinformatics↗