bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Billoud, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Billoud, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tip growth in the brown alga Ectocarpus is controlled by a RHO-GAP-BAR domain protein independently from F-actin organisation

The brown alga Ectocarpus is a filamentous seaweed that grows by tip growth and branching. In the morphometric mutant etoile, tip growth is slower than in the WT and eventually stops. In this paper, we show that the causal etoile mutation is a null mutation in a bi-domain BAR-RhoGAP gene. By quantitative RT-PCR, we showed that ETOILE is ubiquitously expressed in prostrate filaments of the Ectocarpus sporophyte, and is downregulated in the etoile mutant. We immunolocalised both domains of the protein in WT and etoile, as well as RAC1, the known target of Rho-GAP enzymes. Thus, ETOILE would be localised at the apical cell dome where it would control the localisation of EsRAC1 to the plasma membrane. Actin staining showed that the mutant is not affected in F-actin structures. Overall, these results suggest that in Ectocarpus, BAR-RhoGAP controls tip growth by controlling RAC1 localization and through an actin-independent mechanism.

developmental biology↗

Acquisition of cell identity in the brown alga Ectocarpus: which of time, cell shape or position matters most?

During development, cells undergo simultaneous changes of different types that together depict cell "identity". In the multicellular brown alga Ectocarpus sp., while ageing, cells change shape and relative position within the filament. Understanding how these factors act and interact to specify cell identity requires markers of cell identity and the ability to genetically separate age, shape and position. Here we used laser capture microdissection (LCM) to isolate specific cell types from young sporophytes of Ectocarpus, and performed differential RNA-seq analysis. Transcriptome profiles of cell types in the wild-type strain provided signatures of the five cell types that can be identified by shape and position. In two mutants, where the relationship between cell shape, position and age are altered, transcriptome signatures revealed that little differential expression could be identified when only shape was perturbed. More generally, although the two mutants are characterised by opposite morphological phenotypes, their transcriptomes were remarkably similar. We concluded that despite the robustness of cell differentiation during WT development, neither the shape nor the position of the cell could serve as a faithful gauge for tracking differentiation.

developmental biology↗