bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bidaye, S. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Bidaye, S. S..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Hunger reconfigures a reward learning circuit into a memory competent mode

Internal states such as hunger dynamically reshape activity across circuits to support resource seeking. Neuromodulation provides a means of controlling such physiological properties of neurons, but how this flexibility regulates memory networks remains unclear. Here, we describe how hunger reconfigures a dopaminergic food-reward circuit between two physiological modes that support memory formation, in Drosophila. Starvation suppresses baseline dopaminergic activity through peptidergic signalling, enabling reward-evoked, large-amplitude dopamine neuron spikes to reinforce learning. This spiking mode can be engaged by sugar consumption and persists beyond feeding, reflecting the fly's satiety state. Persistent dopaminergic large-amplitude spiking reinforces learning and transitions the memory network into a mode that prioritizes consolidation of recently acquired memories. The transition from hunger to satiation is also reflected in the activity of postsynaptic output neurons that shift from a tonic, decorrelated mode that is responsive to dopamine into a bursting, correlated mode in which further dopaminergic modulation is occluded. Therefore, nutrient deprivation reconfigures the memory circuit into a learning competent dopamine-receptive mode, which persistent reinforcing dopamine then switches into a satiated mode driving memory consolidation. Together these processes mechanistically intertwine state-dependent reward-signalling with subsequent memory stabilization through transitions in physiological mode.

neuroscience↗

Central versus peripheral neural control of a coordinated walking pattern in Drosophila.

Walking involves coordinate rhythmic movements at every joint of every leg. Central pattern generator (CPG) circuits in the spinal or ventral nerve cord provide such a rhythmic drive to all the legs1-3. In turn, each leg provides rhythmic sensory feedback through peripheral proprioceptive neurons2,4-6. Disentangling contributions from these two rhythmic drives, has been a long-standing hurdle in uncovering both the structure and function of neural-circuits governing the generation of a coordinated walking output2,3,7. Here, using the highly tractable Drosophila model and a novel sensory-deprivation paradigm, we uncovered central and peripheral neural pathways underlying walking pattern generation. We provide evidence that each leg is governed by its own CPG module with an inherent cycle period that is unmasked when proprioceptive feedback is reduced. We find that contact driven load inputs and descending brain inputs are critical for coordinating the intra-leg movements and shaping the microstructure of a single legs step-cycle. We show that central coupling pathways underlie inter-leg coordination and that proprioceptive inputs and descending brain commands can flexibly modulate this coupling in a task-specific manner. We identify co-stimulation of specific descending neurons as a mechanism for speeding-up this walking rhythm. Finally, by constraining connectome search8 based on the empirical results, we identify putative neural-circuit motifs underlying generation of a coordinated six-legged walking pattern.

neuroscience↗

Avoidance engages dopaminergic punishment in Drosophila

It was classically suggested that behaviour can cause emotions (Darwin 1872). For example, smiling can make us feel happier, and in rodents the induced patterns of cardiac activity and breathing that are indicative of fear can in turn evoke it (Coles et al. 2022, Hsueh et al. 2023, Jhang et al. 2024). However, the adaptive significance of such feedback is unclear. We show that inducing backward movement, an element of avoidance behaviour in Drosophila, engages negative valence signals in these animals, and reveal the neuronal mechanisms and adaptive significance of this effect. We develop a paradigm with odours as conditioned stimuli paired with optogenetically induced backward movement instead of a punishing unconditioned stimulus, and combined these experiments with pharmacology, high-resolution video tracking, functional imaging, connectome analyses, and modelling. Our results show that backward movement engages dopaminergic punishment neurons and supports aversive memories. Such avoidance-to-punishment feedback counterbalances extinction learning and maintains learned avoidance, reducing the risk of further punishment. This can explain the long-standing "avoidance paradox", the observation that avoidance adaptively persists even when it is successful and no punishment is received (Bolles 1972). Our results provide a neurobiologically grounded argument for an integrated view of behaviour organization and valence processing.

neuroscience↗

Neurofibromin deficiency alters the patterning and prioritization of motor behaviors in a state-dependent manner

Genetic disorders such as neurofibromatosis type 1 increase vulnerability to cognitive and behavioral disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neurofibromatosis type 1 results from loss-of-function mutations in the neurofibromin gene and subsequent reduction in the neurofibromin protein (Nf1). While the mechanisms have yet to be fully elucidated, loss of Nf1 may alter neuronal circuit activity leading to changes in behavior and susceptibility to cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Here we show that mutations decreasing Nf1 expression alter motor behaviors, impacting the patterning, prioritization, and behavioral state dependence in a Drosophila model of neurofibromatosis type 1. Loss of Nf1 increases spontaneous grooming in a nonlinear spatial and temporal pattern, differentially increasing grooming of certain body parts, including the abdomen, head, and wings. This increase in grooming could be overridden by hunger in food-deprived foraging animals, demonstrating that the Nf1 effect is plastic and internal state-dependent. Stimulus-evoked grooming patterns were altered as well, with nf1 mutants exhibiting reductions in wing grooming when coated with dust, suggesting that hierarchical recruitment of grooming command circuits was altered. Yet loss of Nf1 in sensory neurons and/or grooming command neurons did not alter grooming frequency, suggesting that Nf1 affects grooming via higher-order circuit alterations. Changes in grooming coincided with alterations in walking. Flies lacking Nf1 walked with increased forward velocity on a spherical treadmill, yet there was no detectable change in leg kinematics or gait. Thus, loss of Nf1 alters motor function without affecting overall motor coordination, in contrast to other genetic disorders that impair coordination. Overall, these results demonstrate that loss of Nf1 alters the patterning and prioritization of repetitive behaviors, in a state-dependent manner, without affecting motor coordination.

neuroscience↗

Neural circuit mechanisms underlying context-specific halting in Drosophila.

Walking is a complex motor program involving coordinated and distributed activity across the brain and the spinal cord. Halting appropriately at the correct time is a critical but often overlooked component of walking control. While recent studies have delineated specific genetically defined neuronal populations in the mouse brainstem that drive different types of halting1-3, the underlying neural circuit mechanisms responsible for overruling the competing walking-state neural activity to generate context-appropriate halting, remain unclear. Here, we elucidate two fundamental mechanisms by which Drosophila implement context-appropriate halting. The first mechanism ("walk-OFF" mechanism) relies on GABAergic neurons that inhibit specific descending walking commands in the brain, while the second mechanism ("brake" mechanism) relies on excitatory cholinergic neurons in the nerve-cord that lead to an active arrest of stepping movements. Using connectome-informed models4-6 and functional studies, we show that two neuronal types that deploy the "walk-OFF" mechanism inhibit distinct populations of walking-promotion neurons, leading to differential halting of forward-walking or steering. The "brake" neurons on the other hand, override all walking commands by simultaneously inhibiting descending walking promoting pathways and increasing the resistance at the leg-joints leading to an arrest of leg movements in the stance phase of walking. We characterized two ethologically relevant behavioral contexts in which the distinct halting mechanisms were used by the animal in a mutually exclusive manner: the "walk-OFF" pathway was engaged for halting during feeding, and the "brake" pathway was engaged for halting during grooming. Furthermore, this knowledge of the neural targets and mechanisms for halting, allowed us to use connectomics to predict novel halting pathways that could be relevant in other behavioral contexts.

neuroscience↗

A leaky integrate-and-fire computational model based on the connectome of the entire adult Drosophila brain reveals insights into sensorimotor processing

The forthcoming assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing over 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here, we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, based on neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviors. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. Computational activation of neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing, a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioral studies. Moreover, computational activation of different classes of gustatory neurons makes accurate predictions of how multiple taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Our computational model predicts that the sugar and water pathways form a partially shared appetitive feeding initiation pathway, which our calcium imaging and behavioral experiments confirm. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit that do not overlap with gustatory circuits, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modeling brain circuits purely from connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can accurately describe complete sensorimotor transformations.

neuroscience↗

Two brain pathways initiate distinct forward walking programs in Drosophila

An animal at rest or engaged in stationary behaviors can instantaneously initiate goal-directed walking. How descending brain inputs trigger rapid transitions from a non-walking state to an appropriate walking state is unclear. Here, we identify two specific neuronal classes in the Drosophila brain that drive two distinct forward walking programs in a context-specific manner. The first class, named P9, consists of descending neurons that drive forward walking with ipsilateral turning. P9 receives inputs from central courtship-promoting neurons and visual projection neurons and is necessary for a male to track a female during courtship. The second class comprises novel, higher order neurons, named BPN, that drives straight, forward walking. BPN is required for high velocity walking and is active during long, fast, straight walking bouts. Thus, this study reveals separate brain pathways for object-directed steering and fast straight walking, providing insight into how the brain initiates different walking programs.

neuroscience↗