bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bhuiyan, M. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Bhuiyan, M. R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification and Antibiogram Assay of Escherichia coli Isolated from Chicken Eggs

BackgroundEscherichia coli contamination of chicken eggs is an important food-safety concern, while antimicrobial-resistant E. coli may contribute to the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance through the food chain. However, information on egg-associated E. coli and its antimicrobial susceptibility in Natore District, Bangladesh, is limited. ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of E. coli in chicken eggs collected from commercial farms, markets and indigenous/backyard flocks in Natore District, identify the isolates based on cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics, and assess their antimicrobial susceptibility. Materials and MethodsA total of 84 egg-shell swab samples, comprising 28 samples each from commercial farms, markets and indigenous chicken flocks, were collected from seven upazillas of Natore District between January and June 2023. Samples were cultured on selective and differential media, and presumptive isolates were confirmed by Gram staining, motility and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion method against seven antimicrobial agents. ResultsE. coli was detected in 56/84 (66.67%) egg samples. Prevalence was highest in indigenous eggs (22/28, 78.57%), followed by farm eggs (18/28, 64.28%) and market eggs (16/28, 57.14%). Among 22 confirmed isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, resistance was highest to neomycin (90.91%) and erythromycin (86.36%), followed by oxytetracycline (77.27%), amoxicillin (68.18%), ciprofloxacin (63.63%), levofloxacin (59.09%) and doxycycline (36.36%). No isolate was sensitive to neomycin or erythromycin. ConclusionThe high prevalence of E. coli and substantial antimicrobial resistance among egg-associated isolates indicate an important food-safety and public-health concern. Improved hygienic egg handling, prudent antimicrobial use and continued antimicrobial-resistance surveillance are warranted throughout the poultry production and marketing chain.

microbiology↗

Isolation, Identification and Antibiogram Assay of Escherichia coli from the Environment of Live Bird Markets in Bangladesh

BackgroundLive bird markets (LBMs) may facilitate the persistence and dissemination of Escherichia coli and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria because of intensive bird handling, environmental contamination and inadequate sanitation. However, information on E. coli contamination and antimicrobial susceptibility in LBM environments in Rajshahi District, Bangladesh, remains limited. ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the prevalence, identify the cultural and biochemical characteristics, and assess the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of E. coli isolated from water, soil and bird-dropping samples collected from LBMs in Rajshahi District. MethodsA total of 60 environmental samples, comprising 20 water, 20 soil and 20 bird-dropping samples, were collected from LBMs across all ten upazillas of Rajshahi District between January and June 2023. E. coli was isolated and identified using cultural characteristics, Gram staining and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Kirby- Bauer disc diffusion method against seven antimicrobial agents using CLSI interpretive criteria. ResultsE. coli was detected in 33 of 60 samples, giving an overall prevalence of 55.00%. Prevalence was highest in bird-dropping samples (75.00%), followed by water (55.00%) and soil (35.00%). Among the 33 isolates, resistance was highest to oxytetracycline (78.79%) and amoxicillin (63.64%), followed by ciprofloxacin (48.48%), doxycycline (33.33%), levofloxacin (9.09%), erythromycin (9.09%) and neomycin (6.06%). Sensitivity was highest to neomycin (60.61%), followed by levofloxacin and erythromycin (51.51% each). ConclusionThe high prevalence of E. coli and substantial resistance to several commonly used antimicrobials indicate considerable microbiological and antimicrobial-resistance concerns in LBM environments. Improved sanitation, biosecurity, hygienic poultry handling and prudent antimicrobial use are warranted to reduce environmental contamination and potential transmission of resistant bacteria.

microbiology↗

Molecular Detection and Antibiogram Assay of Escherichia coli Isolated from Poultry Farm Environments

BackgroundEscherichia coli is a common environmental and zoonotic bacterium that serves as an important indicator of fecal contamination and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry production systems. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli in poultry farm environments poses a significant One Health threat to animal, human, and environmental health. ObjectiveThis study aimed to isolate, identify, determine the prevalence, assess the antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and molecularly confirm Escherichia coli isolated from poultry farm environments in Lalmonirhat district, Bangladesh. Materials and MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from January to June 2024 using 60 environmental samples comprising water (n = 20), soil (n = 20), and bird-dropping (n = 20) samples collected from poultry farms in five upazilas of Lalmonirhat district. Isolation and identification of E. coli were performed using standard cultural, morphological, and biochemical techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method following CLSI guidelines. Ten randomly selected isolates were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the species-specific uidA gene. ResultsThe overall prevalence of E. coli was 50% (30/60). Source-wise prevalence was highest in bird-dropping samples (75%), followed by water (45%) and soil (30%). Area-wise prevalence ranged from 33.33% in Patgram to 66.67% in Hatibandha. The isolates exhibited the highest resistance to oxytetracycline (66.67%) and ciprofloxacin (60%), while the highest susceptibility was observed to erythromycin (63.33%), neomycin (56.67%), and amoxicillin (56.67%). All ten isolates subjected to PCR produced the expected 486 bp uidA gene amplicon, confirming their identity as E. coli. ConclusionThe findings demonstrate a considerable prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in poultry farm environments of Lalmonirhat district. Strengthening farm biosecurity, improving hygiene and waste management, implementing antimicrobial stewardship, and maintaining continuous molecular surveillance are essential to minimize the dissemination of resistant E. coli within a One Health framework.

microbiology↗

A Meta-Analysis of the Converging Effects of Different Classes of Antipsychotics on the Frontal Cortex Transcriptome in Laboratory Rodents and Non-Human Primates

BackgroundPsychotic illnesses are among the most debilitating classes of psychiatric disorders, requiring targeted and effective treatment strategies. Although antipsychotics are the primary pharmacological therapy for psychosis, their full range of effects remain unclear, including effects within the frontal cortex, a brain region linked structurally and functionally to psychotic disorders. MethodsTo examine the effects of antipsychotic treatment on the frontal cortex, we conducted a meta-analysis of publicly available rodent (rat, mice) transcriptional profiling datasets (microarray, RNA-Seq). Five datasets (GSE45229, GSE93918, GSE2547, GSE4031.1, GSE66275) were identified within the Gemma database using pre-specified search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria (date: 7/7/2024), yielding differential expression results for eight drug vs. control comparisons (collective n=68). A random-effects meta-analysis model was fit to the log2 fold changes for each gene, and p-values adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR), with follow-up analyses exploring robustness, heterogeneity, and publication bias. To increase the power and generalizability of our findings, an exploratory meta-analysis was also run incorporating antipsychotic effects from both rodents and nonhuman primates (collective n=101), and compared to findings from individuals with schizophrenia. ResultsOur meta-analysis yielded stable estimates for 12,190 genes, identifying 63 genes that were differentially expressed following antipsychotic treatment ("DEGs", FDR<0.05). Differential expression included genes important for serotonergic and cholinergic signalling, and was enriched within pathways linked to oligodendrocyte development and myelination, physiological and cellular stress responses, and cardiovascular function. An exploratory meta-analysis combining rodent and nonhuman primate results confirmed these observations and yielded additional findings (117 DEGs total). Comparisons with human post-mortem findings suggested that some schizophrenia-related gene expression may instead reflect antipsychotic treatment. ConclusionFurther validation is necessary, but our findings suggest that antipsychotics may assist in the regulation of specific structural and functional changes within the frontal cortex linked to psychotic disorders. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=104 SRC="FIGDIR/small/734301v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (26K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aaa2ecorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ae6819org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13454a2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a0877c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Key PointsO_LIPsychosis is treated using two broad types of antipsychotic medication: first-generation (typical) and second-generation (atypical). C_LIO_LIUnderstanding the congruent effects of different types of antipsychotics on regions important for psychosis, such as the frontal cortex, can highlight essential mechanisms. C_LIO_LIA meta-analysis of public transcriptional profiling datasets identified genes and functional gene sets that are differentially expressed across antipsychotic categories. C_LI

neuroscience↗

The Effects of Antidepressants on the Hippocampus: A Meta-Analysis of Public Transcriptional Profiling Data

Depression can be treated with traditional pharmaceuticals targeting monoaminergic function, non-traditional drug classes and neuromodulatory interventions. To identify mechanisms of action shared across clinically-effective antidepressant treatment categories, we performed two systematic meta-analyses of public transcriptional profiling data from adult laboratory rodents (rats, mice). The outcome variable was gene expression, measured by microarray or RNA-Seq from bulk-dissected tissue from two depression-related brain regions (hippocampus, cortex). Relevant datasets were identified in the Gemma database of curated, reprocessed transcriptional profiling data using predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria (hippocampus: 6-24-2024, cortex: 7-10-2024). Differential expression results were extracted for all genes, minimizing bias. For each gene, a random effects meta-analysis model was fit to antidepressant vs. control effect sizes (Log2 Fold Changes) from each study for each brain region, with follow-up analyses exploring sources of effect heterogeneity. For the hippocampus, 15 relevant studies were identified, containing 22 antidepressant vs. control group comparisons (collective n=313 samples), with approximately half representing traditional versus non-traditional antidepressants. Of 16,439 analyzed genes, 58 were consistently differentially expressed (False Discovery Rate (FDR)<0.05) following treatment. Antidepressant effects were enriched in the dentate gyrus and in gene sets related to stress regulation, brain growth and plasticity, vasculature and glia, and immune function. Comparisons with single nucleus RNA-Seq confirmed effects on specific hippocampal cell types, including potential rejuvenation of dentate granule neurons. For the cortex, 13 studies were identified, containing 16 antidepressant vs. control group comparisons (collective n=233 samples). Of 15,583 analyzed genes, only one was consistently differentially expressed (FDR<0.05: Atp6v1b2), but overall expression patterns moderately resembled the hippocampus. These genes and pathways showing consistent differential expression across treatment categories may be promising targets for novel therapies. Future work should explore relevance to human clinical populations and potential heterogeneity introduced by sex and subregion. Key PointsO_LIDepression can be treated with traditional antidepressants targeting monoaminergic function, as well as other drug classes and non-pharmaceutical interventions. C_LIO_LIUnderstanding the congruent effects of different types of antidepressant treatments on sensitive brain regions, such as the hippocampus and cortex, can highlight essential mechanisms of action. C_LIO_LIA meta-analysis of public transcriptional profiling datasets identified genes and functional gene sets that are differentially expressed across antidepressant categories. C_LI Plain Language SummaryMajor depressive disorder is characterized by persistent depressed mood and loss of interest and pleasure in life. Worldwide, an estimated 5% of adults suffer from depression, making it a leading cause of disability. The current standard of care for depressed individuals includes psychotherapy and antidepressant medications that enhance signaling by monoamine neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and norepinephrine. Other treatments include non-traditional antidepressants that function via alternative, often unknown, mechanisms. To identify mechanisms of action shared across different categories of antidepressants, we performed a meta-analysis using public datasets to characterize changes in gene expression (mRNA) following treatment with both traditional and non-traditional antidepressants. We focused on the hippocampus and cortex, which are two brain regions that are sensitive to both depression and antidepressant usage. We found 59 genes that had consistently higher or lower levels of expression (mRNA) across antidepressant categories. The functions associated with these genes were diverse, including regulation of stress response, the immune system, brain growth and adaptability. These genes are worth investigating further as potential linchpins for antidepressant efficacy or as targets for novel therapies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=104 SRC="FIGDIR/small/648805v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14538e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@199c5e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8ed8a6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@31b1f8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗