bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Beyers, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Beyers, R. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Acute molecular and chronic vastus lateralis adaptations to lengthened partial versus full range of motion resistance training in previously trained males

This study examined how lower-body lengthened partial (LP) versus full range of motion (FULL) resistance training affects acute post-exercise signaling, chronic hypertrophy, and cellular adaptations of the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle in resistance-trained men. Eight males (22{+/-}1 years old, 5.6{+/-}1.4 years training) completed a crossover study whereby VL biopsies were collected pre-exercise and 0, 3, and 24 hours following LP and FULL leg extension bouts for transcriptomic and anabolic signaling analyses (Experiment 1). Another 16 males (26{+/-}5 years old; 8.0{+/-}4.9 years training) completed an 8-week, twice-weekly lower-body intervention using a within-subject design (Experiment 2). One leg was assigned to FULL and the contralateral leg to LP training across three exercises (leg press, leg extension, and lying leg curl). Pre- and post-intervention outcomes included VL muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) summed across five equidistant MRI-derived transverse slices and mid-thigh VL biopsy outcomes. As a secondary outcome, other hip and thigh muscles from Experiment 2 MRI scans were assessed. Condition x Time interactions for all outcomes were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. In Experiment 1, both conditions produced similar time-dependent changes in the VL transcriptome and anabolic (mTORC1 and Hippo) signaling, but minimal between-protocol interactions. In Experiment 2, VL summed mCSA significantly increased over time (mean change: 9.3 cm{superscript 2}, 95% CI [6.8, 11.8], P<0.001), but there was no clear evidence of differential change between protocols (LP-FULL change: -1.4 cm{superscript 2}, 95% CI [-6.1, 3.8], P=0.640). Additionally, no significant interactions existed for type I fiber CSA (P=0.476), type II fiber CSA (P=0.350), type I fiber myonuclei (P=0.813), type II fiber myonuclei (P=0.589), type I and II satellite cell number (P=0.102 and P=0.797, respectively), or total RNA content (P=0.537). Despite these null VL-centric findings, secondary Experiment 2 analyses provided some evidence that whole hamstring hypertrophy was greater following LP versus FULL (LP-FULL change: 3.9 cm{superscript 2}, 95% CI [-0.2, 7.9], P=0.058). In conclusion, 8 weeks of LP and FULL resistance training broadly elicit similar acute and chronic VL responses in previously trained men, though secondary hamstring findings suggest that differential responses may depend on exercises included in the resistance training program.

physiology↗

Hip thrust and back squat training elicit similar gluteus muscle hypertrophy and transfer similarly to the deadlift

PurposeWe examined how set-volume equated resistance training using either the back squat (SQ) or hip thrust (HT) affected hypertrophy and various strength outcomes. MethodsUntrained college-aged participants were randomized into HT or SQ groups. Surface electromyograms (sEMG) from the right gluteus maximus and medius muscles were obtained during the first training session. Participants completed nine weeks of supervised training (15-17 sessions), before and after which we assessed muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) via magnetic resonance imaging and strength via three-repetition maximum (3RM) testing and an isometric wall push test. ResultsGlutei mCSA growth was similar across both groups. Estimates [(-) favors HT; (+) favors SQ] modestly favored the HT compared to SQ for lower [effect {+/-} SE, -1.6 {+/-} 2.1 cm2], mid [-0.5 {+/-} 1.7 cm2], and upper [-0.5 {+/-} 2.6 cm2], but with appreciable variance. Gluteus medius+minimus [-1.8 {+/-} 1.5 cm2] and hamstrings [0.1 {+/-} 0.6 cm2] mCSA demonstrated little to no growth with small differences between groups. Thigh mCSA changes were greater in SQ for the quadriceps [3.6 {+/-} 1.5 cm2] and adductors [2.5 {+/-} 0.7 cm2]. Squat 3RM increases favored SQ [14 {+/-} 2.5 kg] and hip thrust 3RM favored HT [-26 {+/-} 5 kg]. 3RM deadlift [0 {+/-} 2 kg] and wall push strength [-7 {+/-} 13 N] similarly improved. All measured gluteal sites showed greater mean sEMG amplitudes during the first bout hip thrust versus squat set, but this did not consistently predict gluteal hypertrophy outcomes. ConclusionNine weeks of squat versus hip thrust training elicited similar gluteal hypertrophy, greater thigh hypertrophy in SQ, strength increases that favored exercise allocation, and similar strength transfers to the deadlift and wall push.

physiology↗