bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Bernhard, S. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Bernhard, S. V..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Mechanisms of genetic instability in a single S-phase following whole genome doubling

Diploid and stable karyotypes are associated with health and fitness in animals. In contrast, whole genome duplications (WGDs) - doubling full chromosome content - are linked to genetic instability (GIN) and frequently found in human cancers 1-3. It has been established that WGDs fuel chromosome instability through abnormal mitosis 4-8, however, the immediate consequences of tetraploidy in the first interphase are not known. This is an essential question because single WGD events such as cytokinesis failure can promote tumorigenesis 9. Here, we found that newly born tetraploid human cells undergo high rates of DNA damage during DNA replication in the first S-phase. Using DNA combing and single cell sequencing, we show that DNA replication dynamics is perturbed, generating under- and over-replicated regions. Mechanistically, we found that these defects result from the lack of protein mass scaling up at the G1/S transition, which impairs the fidelity of DNA replication. This work shows that within a single interphase, unscheduled tetraploid cells can acquire highly abnormal karyotypes. These findings provide an explanation for the GIN landscape that favors tumorigenesis after tetraploidization.

cell biology

Whole-genome duplication shapes the aneuploidy landscape of human cancers

Aneuploidy - a hallmark of cancer - has tissue-specific recurrence patterns suggesting it plays a driving role in cancer initiation and progression. However, the contribution of aneuploidy to tumorigenesis depends on the cellular and genomic context in which it arises. Whole-genome duplication (WGD) is a common macro-evolutionary event that occurs in >25% of human tumors during the early stages of tumorigenesis. Although tumors that have undergone WGD are reported to be more permissive to aneuploidy than tumors that have not, it remains unknown whether WGD affects aneuploidy recurrence patterns in human cancers. Here we analyzed clinical tumor samples from 449 WGD- tumors and 157 WGD+ tumors across 22 tumor types. We found distinct recurrence patterns of aneuploidy in WGD- and WGD+ tumors. The relative prevalence of recurrent aneuploidies decreased in WGD+ tumors, in line with increased aneuploidy tolerance. Moreover, the genetic interactions between chromosome arms differed between WGD- and WGD+ tumors, giving rise to distinct co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity aneuploidy patterns. The proportion of whole-chromosome aneuploidy vs. arm-level aneuploidy was significantly higher in WGD+ tumors, indicating distinct dominant mechanisms for aneuploidy formation in WGD- and WGD+ tumors. Human cancer cell lines successfully reproduced these WGD/aneuploidy interactions, confirming the relevance of studying this phenomenon in culture. Lastly, we induced WGD in human colon cancer cell lines, and followed aneuploidy formation in the isogenic WGD+/WGD-cells under standard or selective conditions. These experiments validated key findings from the clinical tumor analysis, and revealed a causal link between WGD and altered aneuploidy landscapes. We conclude that WGD shapes the aneuploidy landscape of human tumors, and propose that the interaction between WGD and aneuploidy is a major contributor to tumor evolution.

cancer biology

USP28 and SPINT2 mediate cell cycle arrest after whole genome doubling

Tetraploidy is frequent in cancer and whole genome doubling shapes the evolution of cancer genomes, thereby driving the transformation, metastasis and drug resistance. Yet, human cells usually arrest when they become tetraploid due to p53 activation that leads to CDKN1A expression, cell cycle arrest, senescence or apoptosis. To uncover the barriers that block proliferation of tetraploids, we performed an RNAi mediated genome-wide screen in a human cancer cell line. We identified 140 genes whose depletion improved survival of tetraploids and characterized in depth two of them: SPINT2 and USP28. We show that SPINT2 is a general regulator of CDKN1A, regulating its transcription via histone acetylation. By mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation, we show that USP28 interacts with NuMA1 and affects centrosome clustering. Moreover, tetraploid cells accumulate DNA damage and loss of USP28 reduces checkpoint activation. Our results indicate three aspects that contribute to survival of tetraploid cells: i) increased mitogenic signaling and reduced expression of cell cycle inhibitors, ii) the ability to establish functional bipolar spindle, and iii) reduced DNA damage signaling.

cell biology

Selective vulnerability of aneuploid human cancer cells to inhibition of the spindle assembly checkpoint

Selective targeting of aneuploid cells is an attractive strategy for cancer treatment. Here, we mapped the aneuploidy landscapes of ~1,000 human cancer cell lines and classified them by their degree of aneuploidy. Next, we performed a comprehensive analysis of large-scale genetic and chemical perturbation screens, in order to compare the cellular vulnerabilities between near-diploid and highly-aneuploid cancer cells. We identified and validated an increased sensitivity of aneuploid cancer cells to genetic perturbation of core components of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which ensures the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. Surprisingly, we also found highly-aneuploid cancer cells to be less sensitive to short-term exposures to multiple inhibitors of the SAC regulator TTK. To resolve this paradox and to uncover its mechanistic basis, we established isogenic systems of near-diploid cells and their aneuploid derivatives. Using both genetic and chemical inhibition of BUB1B, MAD2 and TTK, we found that the cellular response to SAC inhibition depended on the duration of the assay, as aneuploid cancer cells became increasingly more sensitive to SAC inhibition over time. The increased ability of aneuploid cells to slip from mitotic arrest and to keep dividing in the presence of SAC inhibition was coupled to aberrant spindle geometry and dynamics. This resulted in a higher prevalence of mitotic defects, such as multipolar spindles, micronuclei formation and failed cytokinesis. Therefore, although aneuploid cancer cells can overcome SAC inhibition more readily than diploid cells, the proliferation of the resultant aberrant cells is jeopardized. At the molecular level, analysis of spindle proteins identified a specific mitotic kinesin, KIF18A, whose levels were drastically reduced in aneuploid cancer cells. Aneuploid cancer cells were particularly vulnerable to KIF18A depletion, and KIF18A overexpression restored the sensitivity of aneuploid cancer cells to SAC inhibition. In summary, we identified an increased vulnerability of aneuploid cancer cells to SAC inhibition and explored its cellular and molecular underpinnings. Our results reveal a novel synthetic lethal interaction between aneuploidy and the SAC, which may have direct therapeutic relevance for the clinical application of SAC inhibitors.

cancer biology