bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bernal, X. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Bernal, X. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Disparate introduction histories but similar climatic distribution patterns among congeneric invasive anurans

Commonly shared patterns of introduction and spread into new environmental conditions are often poorly understood, even though a better understanding of invasion history and niche dynamics among closely related invasive species could give practitioners valuable information to prevent and mitigate the impact of biological invasions. For this study, we investigate the invasion history and niche patterns among congeneric invasive species. We synthesize public occurrence data for five invasive alien anurans (Eleutherodactylus coqui, E. planirostris, E. johnstonei, E. antillensis, and E. martinicensis) to reconstruct their historic introductions and evaluate evidence for climatic niche shifts between their native and established non-native ranges. By pairing these data with current and future climate projections, we compare patterns of range shifts under future climate scenarios. Our results highlight different temporal and geographic introduction histories in invasive Eleutherodactylus, but a strong signal of colonizing broader invasive climatic niches, specifically into colder environmental conditions. Under future climate scenarios, suitable habitats for most of the non-native regions are likely to increase, although this increase is restricted under scenarios with high greenhouse gas emissions. Our results reveal that despite different invasion histories, the ability to spread into colder regions may be a conserved trait among the most widespread Eleutherodactylus anurans. This study ultimately shows that commonalities among closely related invasive species can provide clues about their ability to expand into areas with particular abiotic conditions, a pattern likely to be widespread, offering a potentially valuable opportunity to deploy targeted prevention strategies.

ecology↗

A synthesis of the evidence for the acoustic space partitioning hypothesis

Acoustic interference is a critical factor driving the evolution of communication systems. In mixed-species choruses, competition for acoustic space is expected to drive signal differentiation among heterospecific signals. The acoustic space partitioning hypothesis proposes that species differentiate their signals to reduce overlap and thereby reduce acoustic interference. Despite ongoing debates in niche theory, studies in animal communication have remained disconnected from these conversations, and no critical evaluation of this hypothesis has been conducted. We performed a systematic review to assess empirical support for acoustic space partitioning and evaluate the conceptual and methodological approaches used to test it. We found that two-thirds of studies conclude that the acoustic space is partitioned, albeit with a strong taxonomic bias toward anurans. However, studies rarely account for key assumptions of the hypothesis, including co-signaling, limited acoustic space, and signal masking at the receiver. Without explicit evidence of conditions for acoustic interference, signal differentiation alone is insufficient to infer that competition is driving partitioning, since this outcome may also arise from alternative processes. By integrating sensory ecology, we provide a framework to reconcile signal-structure differentiation with receiver perception, thereby improving our understanding of how communication systems evolve in mixed-species choruses.

animal behavior and cognition↗