Bergmann, R. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Contextual modulation and blunted defensive responses to predators in head-fixed and freely moving mice

Behavioral responses to threat -- such as fleeing, freezing, or fighting--can be innate, learned, and strongly shaped by context or competing goals. Here, we asked whether exposure to an ecologically relevant predator obligatorily elicits canonical defensive behaviors across behavioral contexts. We examined predator responses in mice across four experimental conditions: one novel head-fixed reward-driven foraging task and three established paradigms in freely moving animals. In the head-fixed condition, water-deprived mice were trained to walk on a treadmill controlling a virtual environment and water reward delivery and were subsequently exposed to a live rat positioned above the lick spout. Despite the presence of the predator, most mice (5 of 7) maintained foraging performance at baseline levels. However, individual mice exhibited significant, coordinated changes in running speed, pupil diameter, eye movements, and posture, indicating engagement with the threat. To assess how context influences predator responses, we exposed 36 naive, freely moving mice to fear-inducing stimuli, including looming visual cues, rat odor, and a live rat. Even under these conditions, defensive behaviors were variable: only a subset of mice displayed avoidance or escape, and when presented with a freely moving rat, approximately half of the mice avoided the predator. Together, these findings show that predator threat does not elicit a uniform or obligatory defensive repertoire in mice. Instead, defensive responses are expressed flexibly, and are shaped by environmental constraints, task demands, and individual variability. These results challenge the assumption that innate fear behaviors are automatically triggered by predator encounters. Graphical AbstractUsing a head-fixed, reward-based foraging task and complementary freely moving paradigms, we show that mouse responses to predator-related stimuli are variable and context dependent, with limited expression of canonical defensive behaviors such as freezing or flight. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/658679v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (65K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a05a31org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1815084org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cd3a11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19f5d95_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2021

Predicting behavior from eye movement and whisking asymmetry

Navigation through complex environments requires motor planning, motor preparation and the coordination between multiple sensory motor modalities. For example, the stepping motion when we walk is coordinated with motion of the torso, arms, head and eyes. In rodents, movement of the animal through the environment is often coordinated with whisking. Here we trained head fixed mice, navigating a floating Airtrack plus maze, to overcome their directional preference and use cues indicating the direction of movement expected in each trial. Once cued, mice had to move backward out of a lane, then turn in the correct direction, and enter a new lane. In this simple paradigm, as mice begin to move backward, they position their whiskers asymmetrically: whiskers on one side of the face protract, and on the other side they retract. This asymmetry reflected the turn direction. Additionally, on each trial, mice move their eyes conjugately in the direction of the upcoming turn. Not only do they move their eyes, but saccadic eye movement is coordinated with the asymmetric positioning of the whiskers. Our analysis shows that the asymmetric positioning of the whiskers predicts the direction of turn that mice will make at an earlier stage than eye movement does. We conclude that, when mice move or plan to move in complex real-world environments, their motor plan and behavioral state can be read out in the movement of both their whiskers and eyes.

neuroscience↗