bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ben-Oren, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Ben-Oren, Y..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Shifting from correlations to dynamics in the study of human prehistorical resilience to extreme climatic shifts

In recent years there has been a growing body of research on human resilience to extreme climatic shifts in the past. Most studies focus on comparing archaeological records prior to a perceived climatic shift with those after it, to investigate a causal relationship between the two. Although these comparisons are important, they are limited in their potential to facilitate causal understanding of the factors that determined the human response to climate change. We assert that for such understanding, it is necessary to explicitly consider prior processes that could have made certain populations more resilient to the extreme climatic shift. This assertion calls for a new focus on the cultural and demographic dynamics in prehistorical populations, over the generations that preceded the climatic shift. In this article, we lay out several mechanisms of cultural evolution that - together with the experienced climatic dynamics prior to extreme climatic shifts - may have determined populations abilities to cope with them. This endeavor allows us to outline alternative hypotheses regarding what determined the fate of different human groups. These, in turn, may help direct the collection and analysis of archaeological data and to highlight modalities within it that may be helpful for inference of the mechanisms that determined populations resilience to climatic shifts.

ecology↗

Modeling effects of inter-group contact on links between population size and cultural complexity

Human populations rely on cultural artifacts and complex cumulative culture for their survival. Populations vary dramatically in the size of their tool repertoires, and the determinants of these cultural repertoire sizes have been the focus of extensive study in recent years. A prominent hypothesis, supported by computational models of cultural evolution, asserts that tool repertoire size increases with population size. However, not all empirical studies seeking to test this hypothesis have found such a correlation; this has led to a contentious and ongoing debate. As a possible resolution to this longstanding controversy, we suggest that accounting for even rare cultural migration events that allow sharing of knowledge between different-sized populations may help explain why a populations size might not always predict its cultural repertoire size. Using an agent-based model to explore different assumptions about the effects of population size and migration on tool repertoires, we find that connectivity of one population to others, particularly to large populations, may significantly boost its tool repertoire size when population interactions lead to cultural exchange. Thus, two populations of identical size may have drastically different tool repertoire sizes, hinging upon their access to other groups knowledge. Intermittent contact between populations boosts cultural repertoire size and still allows for the development of unique tool repertoires that have limited overlap between populations.

evolutionary biology↗

Cultural specialization as a double-edged sword: division into specialized guilds might promote cultural complexity at the cost of higher susceptibility to cultural loss

The transition to specialization of knowledge within populations could have facilitated the accumulation of cultural complexity in humans. Specialization allows populations to increase their cultural repertoire without requiring that members of that population increase their individual capacity to accumulate knowledge. However, specialization also means that domain-specific knowledge can be concentrated in small subsets of the population, making it more susceptible to loss. Here we use a model of cultural evolution to demonstrate that specialized populations can be more sensitive to stochastic loss of knowledge than populations without subdivision of knowledge, and that demographic and environmental changes have an amplified effect on populations with knowledge specialization. Finally, we suggest that specialization can be a double-edged sword; specialized populations may have an advantage in accumulating cultural traits but may also be less likely to expand and establish themselves successfully in new demes due to the increased cultural loss that they experience during the population bottlenecks that often characterize such expansions.

evolutionary biology↗