Biology subjects

Belmann, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Belmann, P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Assessing taxonomic metagenome profilers with OPAL

Taxonomic metagenome profilers predict the presence and relative abundance of microorganisms from shotgun sequence samples of DNA isolated directly from a microbial community. Over the past years, there has been an explosive growth of software and algorithms for this task, resulting in a need for more systematic comparisons of these methods based on relevant performance criteria. Here, we present OPAL, a software package implementing commonly used performance metrics, including those of the first challenge of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI), together with convenient visualizations. In addition, OPAL implements diversity metrics from microbial ecology, as well as run time and memory efficiency measurements. By allowing users to customize the relative importance of metrics, OPAL facilitates in-depth performance comparisons, as well as the development of new methods and data analysis workflows. To demonstrate the application, we compared seven profilers on benchmark datasets of the first and second CAMI challenges using all metrics and performance measurements available in OPAL. The software is implemented in Python 3 and available under the Apache 2.0 license on GitHub (https://github.com/CAMI-challenge/OPAL).\n\nAuthor summaryThere are many computational approaches for inferring the presence and relative abundance of taxa (i.e. taxonomic profiling) from shotgun metagenome samples of microbial communities, making systematic performance evaluations a very important task. However, there has yet to be introduced a computational framework in which profiler performances can be compared. This delays method development and applied studies, as researchers need to implement their own custom evaluation frameworks. Here, we present OPAL, a software package that facilitates standardized comparisons of taxonomic metagenome profilers. It implements a variety of performance metrics frequently employed in microbiome research, including runtime and memory usage, and generates comparison reports and visualizations. OPAL thus facilitates and accelerates benchmarking of taxonomic profiling techniques on ground truth data. This enables researchers to arrive at informed decisions about which computational techniques to use for specific datasets and research questions.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

CAMISIM: Simulating metagenomes and microbial communities

Shotgun metagenome data sets of microbial communities are highly diverse, not only due to the natural variation of the underlying biological systems, but also due to differences in laboratory protocols, replicate numbers, and sequencing technologies. Accordingly, to effectively assess the performance of metagenomic analysis software, a wide range of benchmark data sets are required. Here, we describe the CAMISIM microbial community and metagenome simulator. The software can model different microbial abundance profiles, multi-sample time series and differential abundance studies, includes real and simulated strain-level diversity, and generates second and third generation sequencing data from taxonomic profiles or de novo. Gold standards are created for sequence assembly, genome binning, taxonomic binning, and taxonomic profiling. CAMSIM generated the benchmark data sets of the first CAMI challenge. For two simulated multi-sample data sets of the human and mouse gut microbiomes we observed high functional congruence to the real data. As further applications, we investigated the effect of varying evolutionary genome divergence, sequencing depth, and read error profiles on two popular metagenome assemblers, MEGAHIT and metaSPAdes, on several thousand small data sets generated with CAMISIM. CAMISIM can simulate a wide variety of microbial communities and metagenome data sets together with truth standards for method evaluation. All data sets and the software are freely available at: https://github.com/CAMI-challenge/CAMISIM

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

AMBER: Assessment of Metagenome BinnERs

Reconstructing the genomes of microbial community members is key to the interpretation of shotgun metagenome samples. Genome binning programs deconvolute reads or assembled contigs of such samples into individual bins, but assessing their quality is difficult due to the lack of evaluation software and standardized metrics. We present AMBER, an evaluation package for the comparative assessment of genome reconstructions from metagenome benchmark data sets. It calculates the performance metrics and comparative visualizations used in the first benchmarking challenge of the Initiative for the Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI). As an application, we show the outputs of AMBER for ten different binnings on two CAMI benchmark data sets. AMBER is implemented in Python and available under the Apache 2.0 license on GitHub (https://github.com/CAMI-challenge/AMBER).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation - a benchmark of computational metagenomics software

In metagenome analysis, computational methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key components facilitating downstream biological data interpretation. However, a lack of consensus about benchmarking datasets and evaluation metrics complicates proper performance assessment. The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge has engaged the global developer community to benchmark their programs on datasets of unprecedented complexity and realism. Benchmark metagenomes were generated from ~700 newly sequenced microorganisms and ~600 novel viruses and plasmids, including genomes with varying degrees of relatedness to each other and to publicly available ones and representing common experimental setups. Across all datasets, assembly and genome binning programs performed well for species represented by individual genomes, while performance was substantially affected by the presence of related strains. Taxonomic profiling and binning programs were proficient at high taxonomic ranks, with a notable performance decrease below the family level. Parameter settings substantially impacted performances, underscoring the importance of program reproducibility. While highlighting current challenges in computational metagenomics, the CAMI results provide a roadmap for software selection to answer specific research questions.

bioinformatics↗