Biology subjects

Beccari, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Beccari, L..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Histone H2A monoubiquitination in the thalamus regulates cocaine effects and addiction risk

The individual risk of developing drug addiction is highly determined by the epigenetic landscape1,2. Chromatin remodeling regulates drug-induced transcriptional and behavioral effects and the consequent development of addictive behaviors2,3. Several chromatin modifications in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens, including histone H3 methylation, H3 and H4 acetylation, have been implicated in drug addiction. Still, the contribution of other histones and their post-translational modifications (PTMs), such as monoubiquitination is unclear4-8. In the course of investigating the underlying mechanisms associated with melanoma-associated antigen D1 (Maged1)9, a scaffold protein involved in drug addiction9, we found that H2A monoubiquitination in the paraventricular thalamus (PVT) plays a major role in cocaine-adaptive behaviors and cocaine-evoked transcriptional repression. Mice undergoing chronic cocaine administration showed a significant increased monoubiquitination of H2A. Furthermore, we showed that this histone PTM is controlled, in the PVT, by Maged1, along with one of its partner, the deubiquitinase USP710. Accordingly, Maged1 specific inactivation in thalamic vGluT2 neurons, or USP7 inhibition, blocked cocaine-evoked H2A monoubiquitination and abolished cocaine locomotor sensitization. Finally, we identified genetic variations of MAGED1 and USP7 associated with modified transition to cocaine addiction and cocaine-induced aggressive behavior in human subjects. These findings identified a new epigenetic modification in a non-canonical reward pathway of the brain and a potent marker of epigenetic risk factor for drug addiction in human.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

The transcription factor Zic4 acts as a transdifferentiation switch

The molecular mechanisms that maintain cell identities and prevent transdifferentiation remain mysterious. Interestingly, both dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation are transiently reshuffled during regeneration. Therefore, organisms that regenerate readily offer a fruitful paradigm to investigate the regulation of cell fate stability. Here, we used Hydra as a model system and show that Zic4 silencing is sufficient to induce transdifferentiation of tentacle into foot cells. We identified a Wnt-controlled Gene Regulatory Network that controls a transcriptional switch of cell identity. Furthermore, we show that this switch also controls the re-entry into the cell cycle. Our data indicate that maintenance of cell fate by a Wnt-controlled GRN is a key mechanism during both homeostasis and regeneration. One-Sentence SummaryA Wnt-controlled GRN controls fate maintenance in Hydra.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Sequential in-cis mutagenesis in vivo reveals various functions for CTCF sites at the mouse HoxD cluster

Mammalian Hox gene clusters contain a range of CTCF binding sites. In addition to their importance in organizing a TAD border, which isolates the most posterior genes from the rest of the cluster, the positions and orientations of these sites suggest that CTCF may be instrumental in the selection of various subsets of contiguous genes, which are targets of distinct remote enhancers located in the flanking regulatory landscapes. We examined this possibility by producing an allelic series of cumulative in-cis mutations in these sites, up to the abrogation of CTCF binding in the five sites located on one side of the TAD border. In the most impactful alleles, the global chromatin architecture of the locus was modified, yet not drastically, illustrating that CTCF sites located on one side of a strong TAD border are sufficient to organize at least part of this insulation. Spatial colinearity in the expression of these genes along the major body axis was nevertheless maintained, despite abnormal expression boundaries. In contrast, strong effects were scored in the selection of target genes responding to particular enhancers, leading to the mis-regulation of Hoxd genes in specific structures. Altogether, while most enhancer-promoter interactions can occur in the absence of this series of CTCF sites, it seems that the binding of CTCF in the Hox cluster is required to properly transform a rather unprecise process into a highly discriminative mechanism of interactions, which is translated into various patterns of transcription accompanied by the distinctive chromatin topology found at this locus. Our allelic series also allowed us to reveal the distinct functional contributions for CTCF sites within this Hox cluster, some acting as insulator elements, others being necessary to anchor or stabilize enhancer-promoter interactions and some doing both, whereas all together contribute to the formation of a TAD border. This variety of tasks may explain the amazing evolutionary conservation in the distribution of these sites amongst paralogous Hox clusters or between various vertebrates.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2021

DEVELOPMENTAL AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A HOXD REGULATORY LANDSCAPE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS

Modifications in gene regulation during development are considered to be a driving force in the evolution of organisms. Part of these changes involve rapidly evolving cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which interact with their target genes through higher-order 3D chromatin structures. However, how such 3D architectures and variations in CREs contribute to transcriptional evolvability remains elusive. During vertebrate evolution, Hox genes were redeployed in different organs in a class-specific manner, while maintaining the same basic function in organizing the primary body axis. Since a large part of the relevant enhancers are located in a conserved regulatory landscape, this gene cluster represents an interesting paradigm to study the emergence of regulatory innovations. Here, we analysed Hoxd gene regulation in both murine vibrissae and chicken feather primordia, two mammalian- and avian-specific skin appendages which express different subsets of Hoxd genes, and compared their regulatory modalities with the regulations at work during the elongation of the posterior trunk, a mechanism highly conserved in amniotes. We show that in the former two structures, distinct subsets of Hoxd genes are contacted by different lineage-specific enhancers, likely as a result of using an ancestral chromatin topology as an evolutionary playground, whereas the regulations implemented in the mouse and chicken embryonic trunk partially rely on conserved CREs. Nevertheless, a high proportion of these non-coding sequences active in the trunk appear to have functionally diverged between the two species, suggesting that transcriptional robustness is maintained despite a considerable divergence in CREs sequence, an observation supported by a genome-wide comparative approach.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2020

HOX13-MEDIATED DBX2 REGULATION IN LIMBS SUGGESTS INTER-TAD SHARING OF ENHANCERS

BackgroundDuring tetrapod limb development, the HOXA13 and HOXD13 transcription factors are critical for the emergence and organization of the autopod, the most distal aspect where digits will develop. Since previous work had suggested that the Dbx2 gene is a target of these factors, we set up to analyze in detail this potential regulatory interaction. ResultsWe show that HOX13 proteins bind to eutherian-specific sequences at the vicinity of the Dbx2 locus that have enhancer activity in developing digits. However, the functional inactivation of the DBX2 protein did not elicit any particular phenotype related to Hox genes inactivation in digits, suggesting either redundant or compensatory mechanisms. We report that the neighboring Nell2 and Ano6 genes are also expressed in distal limb buds and are, in part, controlled by the same Dbx2 enhancers despite being localized into two different topologically associating domains (TADs) flanking the Dbx2 locus. ConclusionsWe conclude that Hoxa13 and Hoxd genes cooperatively activate Dbx2 expression in developing digits through binding to eutherian specific regulators elements in the Dbx2 neighborhood. Furthermore, these enhancers can overcome TAD boundaries in either direction to co-regulate a set of genes located in distinct chromatin domains. Bullet pointsO_LIHoxa13 and Hoxd genes cooperatively regulate Dbx2 expression in developing digits via eutherian specific enhancers. C_LIO_LIDbx2 is expressed in different digit joint precursors but its function there is not essential. C_LIO_LIDbx2 enhancers also control the expression of the Nell2 and Ano6 genes, which are located in different TADs, thus overcoming the boundary effect. C_LIO_LIDbx2 chromatin architecture and enhancers evolved in the mammalian lineage. C_LI Grant Sponsor and NumberSwiss National Research Foundation #310030B_138662. European Research Council grants RegulHox #588029

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

CONSERVATION AND VARIATIONS OF BIMODAL HoxD GENE REGULATION DURING TETRAPOD LIMB DEVELOPMENT

In all tetrapods examined thus far, the development and patterning of limbs require the activation of gene members of the HoxD cluster. In mammals, they are controlled by a complex bimodal regulation, which controls first the proximal patterning, then the distal structure, allowing at the same time the formation of the wrist and ankle articulations. We analyzed the implementation of this regulatory mechanism in chicken, i.e. in an animal where large morphological differences exist between fore-and hindlimbs. We report that while this bimodal regulation is globally conserved between mammals and avian, some important modifications evolved at least between these two model systems, in particular regarding the activity of specific enhancers, the width of the TAD boundary separating the two regulations and the comparison between the forelimb versus hindlimb regulatory controls. Some aspects of these regulations seem to be more conserved between chick and bats than with the mouse situation, which may relate to the extent to which forelimbs and hindlimbs of these various animals differ in their functions.\n\nAUTHOR SUMMARYThe morphologies of limbs largely vary either amongst tetrapod species, or even between the fore-and hindlimbs of the same animal species. In order to try and evaluate whether variations in the complex regulation of Hoxd genes during limb development may contribute to these differences, we compared their transcriptional controls during both fore-and hindlimb buds development in either the mouse, or the chicken embryos. We combined transcriptome analyses with 3D genome conformation, histone modification profiles and mouse genetics and found that the regulatory mechanism underlying Hoxd gene expression was highly conserved in all contexts, though with some clear differences. For instance, we observed a variation in the TAD boundary interval between the mouse and the chick, as well as differences in the activity of a conserved enhancer element (CS93) situated within the T-DOM regulatory landscape. In contrast to the mouse, the chicken enhancer indeed displayed a stronger activity in fore-than in hindlimb buds, coinciding with the observed striking differences in the mRNA levels. Altogether, differences in both the timing and duration of TAD activities and in the width of their boundary may parallel the important decrease in Hoxd gene transcription in chick hindlimb versus forelimb buds. These differences may also account for the slightly distinct regulatory strategies implemented by mammals and birds at this locus, potentially leading to substantial morphological variations.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

An evolutionary-conserved Wnt3/β-catenin/Sp5 feedback loop restricts head organizer activity in Hydra

The Hydra polyp regenerates its head by transforming the gastric tissue below the wound into a head organizer made of two antagonistic cross-reacting components. The activator, previously characterized as Wnt3, drives apical differentiation by acting locally and auto-catalytically. The uncharacterized inhibitor, produced under the control of the activator, prevents ectopic head formation. By crossing RNA-seq data obtained in a {beta}-catenin(RNAi) screen performed in planarians and a quantitative analysis of positional and temporal gene expression in Hydra, we identified Sp5 as a transcription factor that fulfills the head inhibitor properties: a Wnt/{beta}-catenin inducible expression, a graded apical-to-basal expression, a sustained up-regulation during head regeneration, a multi-headed phenotype when knocked-down, a repressing activity on Wnt3 expression. In mammalian cells, Hydra and zebrafish Sp5 repress Wnt3 promoter activity while Hydra Sp5 also auto-activates its expression, possibly via {beta}-catenin and/or Tcf/Lef1 interaction. This work identifies Sp5 as a novel potent feedback loop inhibitor of Wnt/{beta}-catenin signaling across eumetazoans.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2017

The HoxD Cluster is a Dynamic and Resilient TAD Boundary Controling the Segregation of Antagonistic Regulatory Landscapes

The mammalian HoxD cluster lies between two topologically associating domains (TADs) matching distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscapes. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early transcription of Hoxd gene in forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates more posterior Hoxd genes in digit cells. Therefore, the TAD boundary prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to forearm enhancers, thereby allowing proper limb patterning. To assess the nature and function of this CTCF-rich DNA region in embryo, we compared chromatin interaction profiles between proximal and distal limb bud cells isolated from mutant stocks where various parts or this boundary region were removed. The resulting progressive release in boundary effect triggered inter-TAD contacts, favored by the activity of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the neighboring TADs into a single structure. In this unified TAD, both proximal and distal limb enhancers nevertheless continued to work independently over a targeted transgenic reporter construct. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic TAD border and that the exact boundary position varies depending on both the transcriptional status and the developmental context.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2017

LARGE-SCALE GENOMIC REORGANIZATIONS OF TOPOLOGICAL DOMAINS (TADs) AT THE HoxD LOCUS

BackgroundThe transcriptional activation of Hoxd genes during mammalian limb development involves dynamic interactions with the two Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) flanking the HoxD cluster. In particular, the activation of the most posterior Hoxd genes in developing digits is controlled by regulatory elements located in the centromeric TAD (C-DOM) through long-range contacts. To assess the structure-function relationships underlying such interactions, we measured compaction levels and TAD discreteness using a combination of chromosome conformation capture (4C-seq) and DNA FISH.\n\nResultsWe challenged the robustness of the TAD architecture by using a series of genomic deletions and inversions that impact the integrity of this chromatin domain and that remodel the long-range contacts. We report multi-partite associations between Hoxd genes and up to three enhancers and show that breaking the native chromatin topology leads to the remodelling of TAD structure.\n\nConclusionsOur results reveal that the re-composition of TADs architectures after severe genomic re-arrangements depends on a boundary-selection mechanism that uses CTCF-mediated gating of long-range contacts in combination with genomic distance and, to a certain extent, sequence specificity.

genomics↗